Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    Assuming you bought the property after Aug 1996, you are correct, and your sister is wrong.  Don't forget the 50% CGT discount either.

    Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    Theres a number of reasons why I don't like managed funds:

    1/     You have bugger all control over your money.

    2/      The overall value of your investment can fall, and yet you still have to pay tax on it !

             Example 

             Opening Balance     $300,000
    Add: Net Income                  $10,000   (This is what you pay tax on)
    Less: Capital Losses       $35,000
              Closing Balance       $275,000

    3.   Managed Funds have been known to engage in frequent "switching" of investments, just for the sake of charging more fees,
          rather than because it makes good investing sense.

    Need I go on

     

    Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    Monster24

    My exposure to John Fitzgerald has been as follows:

    1/    I went to one of his Melbourne seminars last year,  and had one follow up free consultation.  (not with John)
    2/    I have read all his books and seen all his DVDs.
    3/    I have read his Wealth manual, "Untold Wealth: Sucess from Scratch"
    4/    I have seen his infomercials at 2 am in the morning.

    So I think that I have a fair idea of what he is about, and am therefore qualified to comment.

    Here is how I see the advantages and disadvantages of his approach.

    Advantages

    1.   For the passive investor, who is happy for the normal property cycles to run its course, and acquire property wealth slowly,
          the strategy is sound.

    2 . From the way it was explained to me,  his organisation has a strict investing criteria, which I believe are sound.

          For example, they will only  build 'x' kms from the CBD, there has to be so many schools within a certain radius of the property,
          they wont build in a area that contains more than 30% in rental properties,  and they target areas where large infrastructure
          projects are in the pipeline, and "positive" industry changes are forecasted, and population growth is forecasted.

    3.  I like his emphasis on high "land content"

    4.  I am impressed by the charity work that John is involved in.

    Disadvantages

    1.  If you are looking at property as a vehicle to use to either get out of the rat race quickly, then I don't think the strategy is for you.
         This is because:

         –  Your relying too heavily on market cycles,   (you can't rely on property going up every year),
         –  There is a limit on how many negatively geared properties you can carry, 
         –  For most people, there is a limit on how much money you can borrow.

        The strategy that I would use to get out of the rat race is as follows:

       1.  Acquire between 1 to 5 investment properties that you intend to keep for the long term, if not for ever.
            (It is ok if they are negatively geared in the short term).
     
            (You could use the John Fitzgerald strategy for this)

       2.  Get involved in doing some short term property trades / renos / etc.   Plough those profits into paying off your
            long term properties, and then you have a choice to leave the rat race.

           (You could use the Steve McKnight strategies for this)

            As Steve says, if you don't want to be at the mercy of the market, and be told by that you can't buy any more property,
            you have to take control of your situation.

     

       

    Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    I suggest that everybody reads the May newsletter, as Simon makes some very intelligent comments about this very topic.

    Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    Auction Headlines Update

    Sunday Age 29/04/07   – "Fiery bidding as market surges forward"

    Sunday Sun 29/4/07    – "Yesterday's auctions: happy days"

    Sunday Age 06/05/07  – "Sales add more fuel to the quoting fire"

    Herald Sun 07/05/07  –  "Autumn rush looms"

    Age 07/05/07               –   "Buyer frenzy points to winter activity running hot"

     

    Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    The cost of "renovations" as a general rule are only tax deductible when you sell the property. This is because they form part of the cost base of the property.  However, you can write off the cost of the renovations at the rate of 2.5% per year. This is known as claiming a "capital works" deduction, which is a similar concept to "depreciation".  I wouldn't just spend money on the property willy nilly and hope for the best, I suggest that you run it by your accountant, before putting your hand in your pocket.

    Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    Thanks for your comments LA Aussie.  Just thought that you would like to know that in today's Age, it was stated that agents underestimated the auctions prices by an average of 20.6 per cent, and the weekend before that by 20.3 per cent.

    Profile photo of Real2Real2
    Member
    @real2
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 15

    Thanks Richard

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)