Forum Replies Created
Hi Hulkster
Ideally you dont want to cross collaralise the 2 securities so need to be careful on how you structure the 2 loans.
Probably easiest way to go is to look at an investment line of credit secured against your PPOR to cover 20% of the land & building costs and then through a separate lender look to take out standalone interest only investment loan.
Your mortgage broker should be able to give you some suggestions for suitable lenders once they have some further hard data.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Look i hate to say he or she is totally wrong and with the equity you have there are a couple of lenders who would do the deal.
Genuine savings is not required when you have that amount of equity and your employment also should not be a issue.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Weswas
There are a couple of factors and steps to consider.
Firstly buying as a first time buyer and I assume wishing to claim the First Home Owners Grant you will have little alternative but to buy the property in your sole name as using a Trust or other entity will disqualify you from claiming the FHOG on this property.
Secondly there is not point in trying to pay down the principal significantly when you intend to eventually turn the property into an IP as the interest charged on the funds resulting from any redraw would not be tax deductible unless they are for investment purposes.
I would therefore look to take out an interest only loan with 100% offset account and put all of my savings into the offset account to maximise the tax effectiveness when you rent the property out but also reduce the interest charged in the meantime.
Now the question as to what lvr you look at will depend on whether you wish to pay mortgage insurance and preserve your capital or not.
A good independant mortgage broker should be able to give you some options as many lenders will not like the fact on a high lvr that you wish to take out an interest only loan on your PPOR.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi there
Yes i ahave dozens of forum members in Melbourne and Victoria.
To be honest you dont need to reward her for incorrect information. Brokers do this all the time and i have had dozens of clients where we have provided them with all the structured advice and then they have gone elsewhere.
Unfortunately just facts of life in the industry.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Sheran
I answered your question on the other forum but in essence this is what i posted.
I would be wary if the agent selling the property wants to organise your finance as he acting for the vendor certainly will have any interest in the matter and it wont be yours.Just because you are only part time is not really issue with certain lenders given the LVR however it is how it is structured that is probably more important.
I would be seeking advice of a mortgage broker who is going to work for you and not for the vendor.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Sheran
I would be wary if the agent selling the property wants to organise your finance as he acting for the vendor certainly will have any interest in the matter and it wont be yours.
Just because you are only part time is not really issue with certain lenders given the LVR however it is how it is structured that is probably more important.
I would be seeking advice of a mortgage broker who is going to work for you and not for the vendor.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Ruffa
I hate to say the usually reason why a broker suggest this is because they dont understand how to properly structure an investment loan.
You certainly wouldnt in your position corss collateralise the 2 securities unless you wish to invite trouble down the track.
The way you would structure the loan is to take a investment line of credit secured against your PPOR and use this to fund the 20% deposit and acqusition costs.
The separately you would take out a standalone 80% interest only loan secured against the the IP only.
Once the IP increased in value you would raise the loan to 80% of the new valuation and look to pay down the LOC.
Eventually the total loan would be secured against the IP and nothing against your PPOR.
This will save you anquish in the future and protect your principal place of residence.
Brokers who suggest otherwise really make me wonder whether they have any investment lending experience.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Judith
Nobody said it couldnt be done in the US in fact we have been helping clients with this for nearly 15 years.
The reference was made to Australia and was stated that it couldnt be done here in Oz.
To be honest depending on the State 18% is not that great a return.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
George
2 out of 2 great opening contributions.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Judith
I hate to say i a disagree with you.
Perhaps you would good enough to explain to us all how it would work under the Australian Mortgage System.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
A Pty Ltd Company pays Tax at the Corporate Rate which is 30 cents in the dollar.
If the property is purchased solely in the Company name then you will loose the CGT concessionary rate.
Alternative would be to have the Company as a Corporate Trustee for a DFT or similar.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Bill
There are a number of reasons why you wouldnt unless you had to X collateralise.
Couple of quick ones would include:
1) LMI premiums higher as the total loan and lvr increases exposure with the 1 lender and as LMI premiums are based on a sliding scale your costs will increase.
I am assuming that your lender will go to 95% + LMI ? as most wont these days.
2) You have answered your own question in that the lenders policy may have changed and that they revalue your 2 securities and dont agree with your valuation. Might even find that the valuation are lower and you are unable to access further equity.
Also you might have sold a property and expect to use the net cash proceeds but the lender values the remaining security and wants you to pay down some of the debt from the cash proceeds to retain the LVR within it is new policy.
This happens all the time especially in the current climate.
If you want to download a few other reasons my website has a free download word document on it.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Paul
Report just emailed to you.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Lukas
Firstly welcome to the forum and I hope you enjoy your time with us.
Before you start out you need to decide where you want to go and why.
Are you looking to buy and sell property or buy, renovate add value and rent them out.
Once you have established this you can start to formulate a structure and entity for moving forward.
There are reasons why you would hold long term assets in a Company structure however if you are buying long term and the Pty Ltd Company is a Corporate Trustee then this would be a different matter.
From the entity you can then look at how you finance these projects and stage will start to fall into place.
Once you have the formula in place and as long as you do your due diligence on each property then the rest will follow.
Dont be afraid to ask lots of questions along the way.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Nick
If you are unable to evidence your income then it sounds to me like the pre-approval you had was done on a lodoc basis.
Not sure with whom the pre-approval was with but lodoc lending terms and conditions change fairly regularly at the moment.
Assuming you decide to purchase a property prior to departure and that you are able to distribute the retained earnings to you individually over a period of time you might wish to look at establishing a 100% offset account so that the interest earned on the savings offsets the interest being charged whilst at the same time remains oncall and accessible.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Certainly not a scam and is a strategy which we have used to great effect here in Qld and i know Steve has done so in Victoria.
Same like anything that an Agent doesnt undertstand he merely states it cant be done.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Remember in Qld that the date the contract is executed you as the buyer are responsible for the Buildings Insurance.
Given that most insurers will run a mile when you mention Student accomadation you might want to line up you Insurance Cover in readiness for the offer being accepted.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Mark
Residex reports are property based so if you can give me an exact property address then happy to run a report off for you.
Shoot me an email with the details as i dont check the site all that often.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Unfortunately their is insufficient data to enable any structured advice to be provided however i dont think it is as simple as all that.
One thing i would be careful about using your redraw facility for a investment property deposit.
You would be better off to clearly separate the two loans and structure the facility so that they help in reducing the PPOR debt.
Are the loans cross collateralised ?Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Mark
Regretfully i dont fancy your chances as there is clearly insufficient equity in the property and the maximum lvr you will get these days on a IP is 95%.
With the current property being an IP already you probably dont want to pay down the debt to increase your equity so are limited to your cash funds or the available equity in the current property.
At a 90% lend on a new valuation there is next to nothing in the current property even if the valuation came in at $240K.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender