Forum Replies Created
Hi goosehead
I think from reading your what you are trying to achive you are referring to a security substitution / portability of loans.
Yes depending on the lender you certainly can but they be better ways around it.
Obviously without further information it is difficult to give you a more detailed answer.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi goosehead
I think from reading your what you are trying to achive you are referring to a security substitution / portability of loans.
Yes depending on the lender you certainly can but they be better ways around it.
Obviously without further information it is difficult to give you a more detailed answer.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
At the moment about 10 minutes.
Last deal i did with them we had a call from their Credit dept within 8 hours saying that due to the fact they had increased their interest rates higher than the RBA official increase they had hardly received a deal and therefore was approved immediately.
Only reason we had to use Westpac was the client had a fixed rate home loan and this was an investment LOC otherwise we would have refinanced the deal elsewhere.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Definately confused.
CGT is based on the profit. Difference between the net sale price and the original purchase price plus stamp duty adjustment, renovation costs etc.
Based on your figures above and ignoring sale costs etc you would pay CGT on $55K being $400K – $300K – $15K – $30K.
Bit of a difference.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Simply any lender worth their salt wouldnt.
Property can be in Joint names loan can be in joint names with only 1 income taken into consideration.
There are lenders out there who dont care less if you are on probation.
Sounds to me like your mortgage broker has got confused over the deal or maybe it is the first one he/she has done.
Just tell him to get it approved and move on.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Must admit never heard of it on a Line of Credit with any lender we deal with.
Usually it would be 85% + LMI.
If in any doubt i would be using a separate lender.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Plummer
No it is not a mistake many institutions do not like lending to Trust structures. It is all about understanding what they are doing.
Get your Mortgage Broker to give you some additional options because you should be able to get the combination of a competitive rate of interest, low fees and flexibility under a Trust structure even with a Corporate Trustee.
Maybe your Mortgage Broker is slightly inexperienced in this field.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Slightly confused myself but at 85% LVR you would be able to normally capitalise the LMI.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
I have completed over 180 wraps here in Qld over the past 14 years but wonder how you financed the deal to onsell in the current climate as no lender will knowingly lend where the property is being onsold by way of an instalment contract.
We as a Company (First Home Owners Group Pty Ltd) had an arrangment with a couple of the major Banks however your average investor would not be able to forge such a relationship.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Zea
Yes certainly i would look to have the first property in your name (subject to 101 points).
Unsure whether you have an existing PPOR but if so just need to structure it correctly to ensure that you can keep on buying.
Get your Mortgage Broker to explain to you the benefits of not cross collateralising the loans.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
The Buyer (wrappee) is responsible for his / her Stamp Duty and it is payable on the Instalment Purchase price payable 30 days after the Contract becomes unconditional.
Of course depending on the sale price and the status of the purchaser they maybe exempt if it is a First Home.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Julie
As Dan has mentioned refinancing will have no benefit if you are looking to increase the Tax deductions and the redrawn interest will not be deductible.
Personally I would spend a dollar or two fixing up the cracks so the property is readily tenantable (assuming these are cosmetic and not significant flaws in the building) and then look at accessing the equity in the IP to use as deposit for your new property.
Selling merely to raise additional cash deposit when you are looking long term to increase your asset base is rather short lived.
The equity released together with some or all of your funds in the current offset account can be used to fund the new PPOR and cover the acqusition costs. Try and ensure your Mortgage Broker does not cross collateralise the loans and keeps them as standalone securities.
Release the offset account on your current IP on settlement and link up a new one to your non deductible debt.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Doesnt quiet work like that.
Dont forget you can only usually access a maximum of 90% of the current valuation so in your example $350K x 90%
= 315,000 less existing loan of $256,000 = Access to $59000.Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Yes course it can be achieved but if the Vendor is half smart he will be aware of the moving market and expect a higher premium paid up front for the Call Option or a shorter exercise period so if you falter he can capitalise on the appreciating prices.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Also bear in mind that most loans these days are also Credit scored in additional to using a numeral based calculation and the combination of the 2 will produce the lending result.
Equity release is a common strategy and one i have used effectively to get where i have today.
Remember Rome wasnt built in a day so a skillfull Mortgage Broker is one who can work with you and show you how to best utlise both your income and equity to achieve the desired goal.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Lenders assess serviceability using a P & I repayment on an affordability rate as a buffer to allow for when the loan rolls over to P & I at the expiry of the interest only period.
The Dragon has a maximum interest only term of 15 years on its Term products.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
As long as the property available for rent then you are entitled to claim the deductions.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Because the funds you dont use can be used as deposit on another IP or indeed as deposit for your own non deductible PPOR.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Never needed one but have been on the other end and funded one.
Worked fine in this case but often timing can be an issue.
Person lending the money wants security and this cant be obtained until settlement however funds usually needed up front to show deposit for the loan from the main lender.
Kinda chicken and egg issue.
Couple of ways around it if you have other equity, savings etc.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Mike
Is it correct that I could only claim 30 c in the dollar for the LMI – Almost.
LMI is a loan cost so once the property becomes available for rent you could claim the portion of LMI left over the 5 year period.
Like all loan related costs it will help you reduce your Taxable income so in effect you are getting a 30% Tax deduction on the premium.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender