Forum Replies Created
Thanks everybody – your comments have been helpful, and i am sure that people will find your comments helpful!!!
qbnjuggernaut
qbnjuggernaut wrote:Scott No Mates wrote:QB, how can you assume that the tribunal should back the owner? Owners don't contribute to the bond (paid by the tenant)In my case, the tenant broke a fixed term agreement. I have lost approx $1100 in rent, as tenant moved out with 3 weeks left on tenancy. I have not broken any part of the lease. If you take the time and read some of the decisions made by tenancy tribunal – http://www.cttt.nsw.gov.au there is obvious breaches by both tenants and landlords, all that i am saying, is if you are grieved by a percieved breach by either party, take your complaint to the tribunal.
All you look for is consistancy – the Residential Tenancy Act 1987, is the legislation that we as landlords/tenants are governed by, and clearly sets out those standards. If you break this, you are in breach of it. But i am not so sure, after reading some of the decisions, made by the tenancy tribunal.
Scott No Mates wrote:QB, how can you assume that the tribunal should back the owner? Owners don't contribute to the bond (paid by the tenant)rachelthelegend wrote:Hi ThereThanks for your comment – Tenant asked for posponment – overseas on holidays. As "goodwill" i supported application. This gives me more time to do some homework. I disagree with your statement.
I have downloaded a full copy of residential tenancy act(NSW) and it runs into something like 70 odd pages – not the 4-6 pages you get through agents. I believe a "fixed term lease" is exactly that – it confirms it under section 3 of the act, as does "tenant", "landlord" and "tenancy agreement". I believe the tenant has breached sec 53 subsection f and g "A residential tenancy agreement terminates only in one or more of the following
(f) if the tenant abandons the property;
(g) if the teant delivers up vacant possession of the premises WITH THE PRIOR CONSENT of the landlord, whether or not that consent is subsequently withdrawn. I certainly did not give prior consent. Nor have I breached any part of the lease.
So that is what i will go to the tribunal with. You cant have tenants breaking fixed term leases – it sends the wrong message, that you can go around and break contracts, go through tribunal and win. It is the same for landlords. I do agree with you that "depends on who is on the tribunal", I have been told this by a couple of agents, who have lost "certain tenancy breaches by tenants" and the rich landlord can mop up the damages, as they can afford it!!!Im a property manager in Victoria, and i believe the tribunals run reasonably the same…
If a tenant has signed fixed term agreement, this must have a clause in it stating that they are responsible for break lease fees if they do so. This can include a letting fee, rent until a new tenant is found and advertising costs.
HOWEVER – tribunals are very swayed in the tenant's opinion (despite the cynical view that we scratch their backs, they scratch ours…) and so any clauses added by a landlord/agent can be thrown out by the tribunal. It depends entirely on the member that hears the case. If the tenant doesn't turn up this is also a bonus. Make sure you have sent all notices, including notice of the hearing by registered post.
Good luck!
nicola alison wrote:Hi KevinI don't know but when you find out will you let me know. We are thinking of doing the same.
Cheers Nic
I have just got a reply from TICA. Does not sound too bad. I think from the information they sent me, it costs $143 – this gives you 10 inquiries($14.30 per inquiry) this has to be paid up front. I dont need it right now – but definately when i advertise for my next tenants.
Hope this helps you – it did me.
Prakman wrote:Hi guys and gals,For the sake of 5-6%, why are you tring to manage the property yourself?
Instead of spending the weekend checking whether the tennants have paid rents, it's better to spend your time scouting out a new deal.
Let someone else have the headache dealing the property and you're better off managing the PM and enjoying your weekend.
Happy Investing.
[/quoteWhilst I have enjoyed good PM's – I think the charge of 8-9% is money I could have in my pocket. It works out approx $240-$270 per month. Yes it is tax detuctible – but you still have to find that money every month. I have a good relationship with my tenants, and I feel that it is not "Me – Them mentality". My payments are done electronically, (internet banking) and touch wood , it appears to be ok at this stage. I feel if I do my own inspections, I can see for myself how my properties are being looked after. I have been in after my PM done inspections – and have been far from impressed. Plus my tenants dont have to physically go to the bank withdraw monies then find a car park, and finally pay the PM. The tenants appear to like this as well. A couple of keystrokes and the money is in my account.
Being a shiftworker, sat and sunday's are just another day. I personally like the hands on, and be in control of my properties, instead of other people. Still havent got any Database numbers. Anybody able to help!!!!!!!
With today's interest rate rise – we all have to tighten our belts. SO i dont think, I will be out scouting for new property.
Regards
Qbnjuggernaut
Hi
I would not say “Absolute Beachfront” but say within200-300metres, from the beach.
Regards
Kevin Astill