Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 71 total)
  • Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    i’ve not read steve’s book,

    but I disagree with not claiming depreciation because of the time value of money….the taxation of inflation. $100,000 now is worth much less than after 10,20,30 years. Even if you had to sell and pay CGT, you are give increase cashflow now, in the present.

    Also I follow the principle when I buy a good asset that’s producing a good cashflow, the time to sell the asset is never. Warren Buffet works by this principle.

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Yes you can,

    you can do it several ways, the commissioner would allow

    1. u estimate the cost of construction and you can claim the costs. Some costs are fixtures and fittings (40) and some are capital (43)

    2. hire a quantity surveyor and he’ll estimate the costs for you

    3. use an architect and he’ll estimate the costs for you

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Alf

    Div 43 is when you claim building depreciation
    Div 40 is when you claim furniture

    eg. You paid $100,000 for property
    u sell for $150,000
    Div 43 – u claim $10,000 of building depreciation
    Div 40 – u claim $5,000 of fixture and fittings

    When u sell, u have to do balancing adjustment of div 40 – lets assume its $3000

    You assessable CGT is $50,000 + $10,000 + $3000
    total is $63,000
    50% discount $31,500 (assuming ur on 48.5% tax)
    your tax is $15,277

    now there are also other implications like GST,
    if you are liable for GST, then u will have to pay $13,636 GST on the sale.

    so like i said depending on your circumstances, if GST is applicable then your total tax will be
    $28,913 (sux huh)

    but most people will not have to pay GST, but depends on your situation

    if your accountant does’nt tell u this, get a new accountant.
    My charter accountant did’nt know about this, I had to learn it myself. I now have a new accountant who still does’nt know about this, I have to tell him what to do! go figure?

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Did u claim any depreciation on the property?

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    You can only claim the book if you already have an investment property
    you cannot claim it if u use it to buy an IP

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    40% Shares (90% Blue Chips, 10% speculative)
    10% Managed Funds
    40% Property (residential + commercial)
    10% Businesses (private)

    These give good cashflows for further acquisitions

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Alf,

    that’s the simplified version
    but there are so many variables
    need to know what your situation is
    what entity did you use to buy this asset

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Alf,

    if you claim Division 43, then the amount you claim will be equal the amount reduced by your cost base. this is assuming your asset was purchased after September 1985

    if you claim division 40, then there will be a balancing adjustment from the time you dispose of the asset

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    M1in12

    can you tell me where i can find this information please cause it looks like the information i have may be erroneous

    thanks

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Tilly,

    in regards to MVA, compulsory third party covers all damages to people whom you injury. the insurance company pays for all that. the one you should look out for is people who work for you at your home and slip and fall and break their neck. if they’re not covered and you’re not covered, then you’ll be in deep S#%t

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Westan

    ru sure?

    I spoke to this tax lawyer and he told me a change in trustees will trigger a CGT event. The trustee is the owners of the asset and held in trust for the trust. If you change trustees, the ato will require a re-evaluation of the trust assets and wack a CGT on that?

    that’s what I’ve been told anyway

    I’ll have to look this up now

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Yep, you can do that for five years only though

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    I managed to find 2 in sydney, but it was not easy though

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    Age is never a barrier,

    ‘just do it’ – Nike

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    If you change trustees, you will trigger a CGT event, I think its E1 or something like that
    Also there will also be stamp duty issue on change of trustee
    ergo you have to decide now before who will become the trustee.

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    westan,

    why do u want to put your home in a family trust
    and when you say a family trust, what do you mean by family trust?

    And yes, my accountancy fees are quite heafty, but the tax savings and asset protection are worth it

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72
    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    for tax purposes, you should not purchase appreciating assets under a corporate structure

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    buying things in your own name could be parlous

    u should be concerned about litigation and tax consequences

    look at the structure that suits u

    unfortunately in this complex society we live in, buying assets in your own name is parlous

    Profile photo of puissancepuissance
    Member
    @puissance
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 72

    don’t forget to include GST in your cashflow

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 71 total)