“There was no reason for us to become involved _ That was a war based on lies and misinterpretations from London and from Washington, claiming falsely that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks,” he told the Independent newspaper.
from the above news…
I think for killing 10000 people in Iraq George bush should be cuba jail along with oSAMA and Saddam
The United Nations’ top two weapons experts have criticised the United States, saying that the invasion of Iraq was not justified by the evidence in hand.
“I think it’s clear that in March, when the invasion took place, the evidence that had been brought forward was rapidly falling apart,” Hans Blix, who oversaw the investigation into whether Iraq had chemical and biological weapons, told CNN on Sunday.
The evidence Secretary of State Colin Powell presented to the UN Security Council in February 2003 was “shaky”, he said, adding that he told this to US officials, including National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.
“I think they chose to ignore us,” Blix said.
Mohamed ElBaradei, Director General, the International Atomic Energy Agency, told CNN from IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, that he had been “pretty convinced” that Iraq had not resumed its nuclear weapons program.
Days before the war began, Vice-President Dick Cheney had said, “We believe [Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons. I think Mr ElBaradei, frankly, is wrong.”
ElBaradei told CNN: “I haven’t seen anything on the ground at that time that supported Mr Cheney’s conclusion or statement…”
The Bush administration tended “to say that anything that was unaccounted for existed, whether it was sarin or mustard gas or anthrax,” Blix said.
Blix also criticised Powell, who told the Security Council about an Iraqi site that held chemical weapons and decontamination trucks.
“Our inspectors had been there, and they had taken a lot of samples, and there was no trace of any chemicals or biological things,” Blix said. “And the trucks that we had seen were water trucks.”
The United Nations’ top two weapons experts have criticised the United States, saying that the invasion of Iraq was not justified by the evidence in hand.
“I think it’s clear that in March, when the invasion took place, the evidence that had been brought forward was rapidly falling apart,” Hans Blix, who oversaw the investigation into whether Iraq had chemical and biological weapons, told CNN on Sunday.
The evidence Secretary of State Colin Powell presented to the UN Security Council in February 2003 was “shaky”, he said, adding that he told this to US officials, including National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.
“I think they chose to ignore us,” Blix said.
Mohamed ElBaradei, Director General, the International Atomic Energy Agency, told CNN from IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, that he had been “pretty convinced” that Iraq had not resumed its nuclear weapons program.
Days before the war began, Vice-President Dick Cheney had said, “We believe [Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons. I think Mr ElBaradei, frankly, is wrong.”
ElBaradei told CNN: “I haven’t seen anything on the ground at that time that supported Mr Cheney’s conclusion or statement…”
The Bush administration tended “to say that anything that was unaccounted for existed, whether it was sarin or mustard gas or anthrax,” Blix said.
Blix also criticised Powell, who told the Security Council about an Iraqi site that held chemical weapons and decontamination trucks.
“Our inspectors had been there, and they had taken a lot of samples, and there was no trace of any chemicals or biological things,” Blix said. “And the trucks that we had seen were water trucks.”
Number of people get killed in other part of world in terrorist activity does US care? War in Iraq has killed already 10000 people and who knows how many more? I am against the Saddam and Osama but Bush is also part of same group. Because of this war we in Australia facing insure.[angry2]
Well, I’m all [ears] PG!! But seeing you can’t have [gorgeous] can I find you [hairy] instead? Because if [sultan] ran off with [gorgeous] firstly I’d feel [freak] and then [mickey] and [elvis] (me) would [bawl]. Having said that, I would also probably turn into a rather demented [hannibal]
I always put offer very low. But depending on area you have to consider the price. Negotiation is a key point in real estate. I have seen offer being accepted at $50k when price was $75k or more. You have ask about the owner as much information you can ask from real estate agent before putting an offer. All depends on area, vendor and real estate agent (very important factor).
Suturday evening I am flying overseas! I might be able to come for a while on saturday or friday ( which won’t suit anyone I guess). Sorry guys I don’t think I will be meeting you guys.. yes lot’s of things happening with me..
Cheers
[]
PropertyGuRu
[sultan]
Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 1,437 total)