So by “asymetric” do you mean reward can be high in some cases but the risk isn’t that high? Or vice-versa? So we want to increase the reward but with no change to risk, or even decrease risk in the one action. And that would make it asymetric. Stuff like choosing good tenants improves yield AND reduces risk of damage. We need a bigger example. Can’t think. But I get your pt and I think you’re right. Perhaps this is where investors should be focusing – those strategies of property investing that are asymetric.