Forum Replies Created
Hey there all,
Just a quick update on how Saturday’s meeting went. It ended up being a quiet meeting (5 of us and the guest speaker), but there was some awesome discussion and great subject material in the area of asset protection.
Vaughan Carlin from Active Asset Protection was discussing some ways to both protect assets you currently own in your own name, as well as setting up a bulletproof structure to protect your future assets as well. I took down plenty of notes, and will look to put them into a word file or something, and email them to Alvin to put on the Yahoo page.
Mentioning the yahoo page, i think there may have been some confusion or miscommunication on the meeting, hence the low turn-out. This may be because not everyone’s on the Yahoo page, which i believe is to become the primary method of communication (correct me if i’m wrong Alvin). As such, we’re kinda half-way between two methods of communication.
Regardless, for those who couldn’t make it Saturday, Vauchan said he’d be happy to meet with us all again at a later meeting to discuss structuring and asset protection, and as I said, i’ll hopefully have a copy of my notes out there soon!
Until i see you next time, rock on!
Cheers,
Craig.Hey all,
I live in Carlton, and I’d definitely be interested, sounds like a fantastic idea! If you can email me any details as they come up for future meetings, that would be great.
Cheers,
Craig.Hey all,
and another HUGE thumbs-up from myself on the Melbourne Masterclass today. Highly recommended to anyone. Learned lots of new ideas that stretched my context, expanded my horizons, and inspired my to re-evaluate my current situation and investment philosophy (not that i’ve actually bought anything yet).
Look forward to meeting some of you again in August for the next one. [thumbsupanim]
Cheers all,
Craig.
Hey all,
Well, I just attended the Melbourne Masterclass today, but i’ll try not to let that influence my post here too much. [cap] I’m personally of the mind that seminars can be a very useful tool… stressing the word CAN. In the end it’s up to the participant to take any action to get results for the money invested in the seminar, book, whatever.
True, in many cases the material you will go over at a seminar will be exactly the same as in the author’s books, tapes, etc. It can sometimes be just hearing the author describe something a certain way that flicks on the light switch and brings in a new realisation. I think the best description for it i heard was from Robert Kiyosaki, when he describes it in terms of content and context.
Content is the theory and information itself, which as mentioned before can be the same between seminars and books etc. Content can be visualised as the water(ideas, information) which you would pout into a glass(your head).
The context however is the size of the glass that can hold the ideas you learn. I find seminars (not that i’ve been to lots mind you) to be a great way to expand your context, as they’re more emotional, intimate and intense due to the personal contact with the author, discussions you can start, like-minded people you can meet and throw ideas around with. Expand your context, and you’ll be able to take in more ideas and insight, and get more value from the experience.
There are of course various ranges from $50 to many thousands of dollars for seminar programs, but i think each of those can be indicative of the value you’ll get. I don’t mean to say that a $50 seminar won’t be worth attending, but more that the larger-scale events will have lots of backing and support, higher quality, etc. Probably the most important thing though is the money you put on the line yourself, and hence the pressure you then put on yourself to make the most of your investment, and there are cases where this has paid off very well (from stories i’ve heard, not my limited personal experience).
This leads me back to my initial point… Seminars, just like books, CAN be very useful. In the end it’s up to the individual to make the most of the opportunities presented by the experience. As you can see, i’m diligently doing my ‘homework’ from the Masterclass, and am intensely pumped to make changes to my investing approach, and drive myself to take action. In this case the seminar was a very wise investment, and in property, if it drives you to take successful action, you don’t need much to recoup your initial cost.
*Phew* i didn’t realise it was going to be such a long post, will try to trim it down in the future.
Cheers all,
Craig.
Hey guys,
just on the topic of Gold Coast property, I read an article recently suggesting that the market is trending away from seaside properties, due to the price of them being so high that people simply can’t afford to buy. Instead the potential is that the trend could move to hillside communities inland (rural, but still reasonably close to major cities)
I’m just starting in the property scene, so i’m not sure how much credit to give this idea, but I’d be interested to hear other people’s thoughts on the idea.
Cheers all,
Craig.
Hey guys,
I’m also in Melbourne, and again just starting out and finding my feet. I attended Steve’s Masterclass seminar today, and have got to say what a fantastic show all the guys put on – truly eye-opening and mind-blowing. Lots of radical inspiration that’s changing my initial thinking, as well as inspiration to drive me to make a start. I’d definitely recommend it to anyone considering it.
On the topic of this thread, I was also searching around melbourne for CF+ opportunities, and not really find anything. I think the problem was that i was looking for the wrong opportunities, and it ultimately boils down to (and please correct me if i am wrong or this goes against your own experience [cap]) searching for problems to solve, rather than looking for a property that will be CF+ without requiring any action on your part. As landt64 suggests, Steve’s second book seems to be a good resource for ideas to this effect.
Again, i’m also just starting, so any suggestions or comments from more experienced investors would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers all,
Craig.