In NSW it's easy as you have to attach the Contract of Sale to the Option, so we just attach an Instalment Contract.
For WA, I'd suggest you get your lawyer to specify, in the Option, that upon exercising the Option the buyer will have the choice of a standard Contract of Sale or an Instalment (Terms) Contract with the following features …….
The hurdle you're facing revolves around the number of transactions you be undertaking, i.e. around 50. Obviously, these transactions will be undertaken with consumers and 'in the course of a business' (ASIC's wording).
As both 2nd Mortgages and Instalment Contracts are credit contracts, in both cases you would be providing credit and would need ACL coverage from a licence that has the authority to 'engage in credit activities as a credit provider.'
Is there someway you can get an ACL? Give me a call if you'd like to talk about getting ACL coverage for these transactions.
We have been working in the residential real estate vendor finance market place since 2003 and you may be interested in a blog post I've posted called '10 Mistakes to Avoid with Vendor Finance'. It's at:
Regarding Instalment Contracts, Stamp (Transfer) Duty is payable, in all States except Victoria, within a certain number of days of 'exchange' of contracts. In Victoria, the trigger for the payment of Stamp Duty is the transfer of title (for Instalment Contracts).
Yes, it is difficult to cover increasing interest rates using the Rent To Buy (RTB) technique but it can be covered by using an Instalment Contract. I guess it boils down to no one technique being all things to all buyers and sellers. In some cases we put buyers in a RTB for 2 or 3 years, to save the Stamp Duty and then roll them over into an Instalment Contract. It's just a matter of working out what's best for your buyer.
Please take very close notice of Terry's warning regarding the the unlicensed foreign finance 'firm'.
Also, a number of people here have been alluding to Deposit Finance, i.e. the buyer gets an 80% or 90% LVR loan and the seller provides a second mortgage for the remainder. In this scenario it's important to remember that the lender under the second mortgage (usually the seller) will be providing credit. Not only, providing credit but more than likely providing credit 'in the course of a business'.
Providing credit, 'in the course of a business' means the second mortgage lender will require an Australian Credit Licence (ACL) with the specific authority to 'engage in credit activities as a credit provider'. Not something to be ignored as penalties for acting without an ACL very significant.
If the LOANS section of the Particulars of Sale section, on page 3 of Part 1 of the standard Contract of Sale of Real Estate has not been filled out, then you don't have a Contract that is subject to finance.
And paying the full 10% now places you in danger of the Contract going 'unconditional' at the end of the cooling off period, not the 'subject to' period.
As with your previous experience, when the LOANS section is completed correctly, you normally pay a small holding deposit now and the remainder of the 10% deposit after the 'subject to' period runs out.
I suggest you read clause 14.1 of the Contract (on page 7), i.e. 'All money must be immediately refunded to the purchaser if the contract is ended'.
I've been doing this for awhile now and always get my solicitor to look over every Contract before I authorise it. My suggestion is you do the same.
It's worthwhile researching all these educators and choosing one that suits your style.
Yes, we've had experience with joint ventures. In fact our whole vendor finance business revolves around JV's. Around 50% of these JV's happen via http://www.jvpropertypartners.com.au and the rest are with frustrated negatively geared property owners, via http://www.negative2positive.com.au
I've got to agree with Terry. We've been running our vendor finance business since 2003 and, without fail, every one of the the lease/options, instalment contracts, 2nd mortgages and deposit builders we use, to buy or sell with, is drawn up by our solicitor.
We also buy audit insurance from our accountant and we view using a solicitor for all our paperwork in a similar vein, i.e. our solicitor stands by his paperwork.
We use Joint Venture (JV) agreements for most of our vendor finance transactions. Around 50% of our core business is JV's with investors who want to get into vendor finance (VF). This involves buying a property traditionally and then on-selling it with VF. The other 50% of our core business is JV's with frustrated, negatively geared landlords. This JV involves our negative2positive process, i.e. selling a poorly performing IP with VF to improve cash flow.
In both cases we don't need to use a lease/option during any part of the transaction. Unless we decide to sell with a L/O but that probably wouldn't be the case in Vic
We have been working in the residential real estate vendor finance market place since 2003 and you may be interested in a blog post I've posted called '10 Mistakes to Avoid with Vendor Finance'. It's at:
Our experience has been that Vendor Finance works just as well with commercial real estate as it does with residential real estate. I was in a full time job when we started out in 2003 and hugely enjoyed dropping the job in 2009.
I believe Dominique is more involved in strategies to assume properties and loans.
Also, mentioned above is the idea that you can do your own vendor finance legal paperwork. You can but I strongly suggest you don't. Unlike the standard sale and conveyance of a property, that normally takes a few weeks to complete, a vendor finance sale is normally written up for between 5 to 30 years. This leaves ample time for your buyer's situation to change, e.g. relationship breakdown and unemployment.
In situations of financial hardship, the tactic of claiming they didn't understand the legal paperwork is often used by buyers. As a result the vendor financier's expertise in drawing up and explaining legal paperwork will be closely questioned and challenged by the buyer's advisors. As you can imagine, such questioning is going to leave you looking like an amateur.
However, if a solicitor has drawn up the legal paperwork and your buyers have received independent legal advice from a solicitor, you can see that the vendor financier's position is much stronger. It's unlikely that the buyer's solicitor is going to argue that s/he did not explain the Contract properly in the first place