Ruth, apologies for the non functioning negative2positive (N2P) website. It 'went down' yesterday afternoon. Our website person is madly trying to fix it and as soon as it's up again I'll PM you.
Yes we do offer a service to help people set up a one off vendor finance deal. Normally the site would send you a questionnaire about your property and once I get the completed questionnaire back, I can contact you with a few ideas.
If you PM or email me I'll send you the questionnaire.
Albro, my suggestion would be to steer away from your proposed plan as the chances of getting an owner to give you the Option you're looking for aren't good. Once the http://www.negative2positive.com.au website is back up, have a look through that. Also have a look at http://www.jvpropertypartners.com.au These two sites may help you get an idea of how to structure your transactions.
However I'd strongly suggest you get some vendor finance basic education before you try to 'go solo'. If you don't, it's kind of like trying to fly a plane without any flying lessons – easy to crash and burn
I thoroughly agree with all the above. We can help the guy with his Australian Credit Licence application but, as Richard says, it's very possible that he also needs an AFSL. Can't help with that one.
I have been saying to vendor financiers for some time, that 'the authorities' would find a way of regulating Lease/Options, the only remaining vendor finance technique not regulated by the National Credit Code. I thought they may accomplish this regulation by an amendment to the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 but the various, State based, real estate agent legislation may just do the job.
Regarding this case in WA, it has created a legal precedent and it will be interesting to see how other States react. We have already seen a lot of vendor financiers become Australian Credit Licence holders and authorised Credit Representatives. In the not too distant future I believe a lot of vendor financiers will become licensed real estate agents, with even more becoming Agent Representatives.
We saw this coming and got our real estate agent licence last year. All good for the industry from my point of view.
I agree with Richard. Make sure you take it as seriously as all your other investing, i.e. make sure you do your due diligence and don't think of it as a quick way to make a quick buck. It's not.
We've been running our vendor finance business since 2003 and our experience to date has been that, as the number of vendor financiers increases, the knowledge of vendor finance increases out there in the marketplace and buyer demand increases accordingly.
It is worthwhile researching all these educators and choosing one that suits your style.
We know lots of people who have attended the seminars/courses supplied by the above educators and there seems to be a common result for all seminar attendees. The urban myth about results from seminars says that 80% of attendees do absolutely nothing once the seminar is finished and out of the 20% that actually take action, only 20% of them are left after one year. It may be an urban myth but our experience shows this to be pretty spot on.
I believe all the above educators will give you the information you need to get started but it's then up to your ability to 'stick' to the task. Our experience shows that taking a lot of continuing action and not giving up so you can attend the next great 'make a million dollars easily seminar', is the only way to be successful in any business enterprise.
If Terry isn't available, I'd recommend Tony Cordato of Cordato Partners. His office number is 02 8297 5600. I've work with Tony on many very creative transactions since 2003 and I know he is a fervent real estate investor.
scha9799, everything you're looking for is available with an IC, except the 2 year term. The new National Credit Code (NCC) has a real challenge with a short term followed by what is effectively a balloon payment. However there are ways of writing up an IC for a longer term but, at the same time, inserting various mechanisms into the IC to 'movtivate' the buyer to refinance into a traditional loan within, say, the first 5 years. However all such 'motivating mechanisms' must be taken into account when initially qualifying an IC buyer. If you are not locked into a 2 year term an IC may work.
As Terry mentioned, a 2 year Lease/Option would work, except for you making the tenant/buyer responsible for the council rates, the water rates, the insurance and the maintenance on the property. All State Residential Tenancy Acts won't allow this.
Questions. 1. With an IC the VF buyer will be responsible. With a Lease/Option you will be responsible. 2. You wouldn't write up an IC for 2 years – hence not applicable. For a Lease/Option, after 2 years both the Lease and the Option would expire and, if the tenant/buyer did not 'exercise' the Option they would normally have to vacate. 3. An IC is the only way to pass on these costs but an IC would not 'fit' if you are locked into a 2 year term. With a Lease/Option you can get a two year term but you can't pass on these costs. 4. Yes, http://www.vendorfinancemanagement.com.au (Disclosure – we own VFM) 5. It should cost you approximately $1,200 to $1,400 to get the IC or Lease/Option drawn up but we get the buyer to pay this cost.
Luke mentioned above that Steve 'used vendor finance to build a cash flow business.' Instead of selling your Corlette property at a loss (if you sell it for what you bought it for in 2008, it will be a loss), another alternative may be to sell the property with vendor finance (VF). This has the potential to convert your Corlette property to positive cash flow and, at the same time, fix (lock in) your capital gain.
If you wish to free up your equity in the property first, i.e. before you convert it to positive cash flow by on-selling it with VF, it may be possible to redraw from your loan.
We have just sold a property close by (in Salamander) with VF. It was sold at a premium price and is now generating about $500 per month positive cash flow. Considering your Corlette property is probably extracting some serious dollars from your pocket each month, a turn around to making a few hundred dollars per month from the place (after all expenses), may be worth considering.
Along with all the excellent advice here on various strategies and operating models, my answer to your question, i.e. 'what you would’ve done better if given a second chance' is, Start Earlier Time in the market has a great multiplier effect.
Those books mentioned by Luke are all excellent and I too recommend them. I also suggest you get an expert accountant or solicitor to advise you on trust structures, as there are a lot of them. I'd suggest you contact Terryw, a very regular contributor to this forum.
As Tracey asked, how low is your deposit and do you want to rent it or live in it?
If you want this property for investment purposes I'd suggest you don't buy with vendor finance (VF) from a vendor financier. The average client of a vendor financier is a person who is locked out of traditional home loan finance, for one or more of a myriad of reasons but is still wanting to get into her/his own home. These people know they pay a premium price when they buy with VF from a vendor financier.
Buying and IP from a vendor financier would usually seriously increase your negative cash flow above that which a lot of investors in Australia seem happy to accept.
However it is possible to to educate yourself about buying property, direct from the owner, with VF. There are many reasons why people will consider selling their property with VF. It's just a matter of finding those people and learning a sufficient number of VF techniques, so you have a chance of coming up with a solution to their needs.
It's a pretty wide subject but if you do a search on "vendor finance" on this forum you'll find some great information resources on the subject.
While we will not sell a property to a buyer that does not receive independent legal advice, I'm guessing here that you may not have used a solicitor? If not, or if you used a solicitor who is unfamiliar with Instalment Contracts, I'd suggest you contact a vendor finance savvy solicitor who can put together your appeal. My two recommendations are:
Despina Priala Priala Legal Ph: 07 5527 8796
Mark Game Aylward Game Solicitors Ph: 07 3236 0001
Thanks for you PM on this same question. I've replied via PM but here's my response anyway: 'As far as I know, no traditional lender, i.e. bank, building society, etc, will allow you to 'compromise their security'. If you look at most standard mortgage documentation, you need to get their approval to renovate the property, sell the property and rent the property, among other things. Obviously both they and everybody else ignores these requirements but the 'banks' put these conditions in the paperwork so they remain in complete control, i.e they like to remain in a position where their mortgage documentation allows them to 'call in' the loan when they feel they need to.
On the other side of the coin, a delinquent loan is bad for a traditional lender's balance sheet. The reality is, if the traditional lender gets paid each month, they remain happy and everybody goes about their business.
One of the strange things about traditional lenders' attitude towards vendor finance is the fact that, if you go to any 'branch' you will be told they will not approve what you are proposing. Yet, I have two business associates that got $7 million and $5 million lines of credit from two of the big 4 banks, to purchase residential properties and then on-sell them with Instalment Contracts, while the bank's underlying loan remain in place.
I guess that's the difference between consumer and commercial banking, i.e. one section says no, the other yes. We have built our vendor finance business since 2003 and have never had a challenge with an underlying loan lender. Why? Because we make sure they get paid each month
Cheers, Paul'
Also, when asked the following question by an PI insurance underwriter, i.e. '"How does the lender (vendor financier) overcome or address the issue of assignment of property under a mortgage with the financial institution?" the following legal opinion was provided:
'The answer to your question is a technical one – there is no assignment of property in an instalment contract. What happens is that the vendor is entering into a Contract for Sale. It is only on completion that an assignment (known as a Transfer) takes place.
An Instalment Contract is a Contract for Sale with a delayed completion.
The Bank / Lender’s consent is required for all Contracts for Sale, so there is nothing different here from standard procedure.
In terms of timing, a vendor notifies their Bank / Lender that they require a Discharge of Mortgage (by providing a Discharge Authority) shortly before completion is due. I find that Banks will hold open their discharge arrangements for a limited time, each Bank being different. The point is that the Banks do not like being notified a long time beforehand – some like the NAB require completion to take place within about 4 weeks after notification
Therefore, it does not accord with Bank practice to notify a Bank that a discharge is required under a Contract for Sale with a delayed completion until completion is imminent.
We dropped Alliance about three years ago because of their pricing and unworkable rules. We now work with a very VF friendly insurance underwriter and what you propose is not seen as a problem by this underwriter.
Sure go conventional but don't be forced down that path by insurance issues because while Alliance's A******* Unity underwriter may be a pain another large underwriter, i.e. V*…, is quite helpful.