I'd also suggest you get another accountant's opinion regarding the Trust structure. As a Trust is not a legal entity under the law, a clever solicitor that wants to 'have a go' at a Trust will attack the Trustee. If the Trustee is you, ouch. If the Trustee is a $2 company, I'd be feeling much more comfortable.
I believe the extra cost for a Corporate Trustee is well worth it.
I agree that most of these short courses have an up-sell at the end but even McDonalds came up with 'would you like fries with that' while serving you a burger It's important for attendees to realise they are getting basic foundational information at these short courses and to investigate, before they attend, how they plan to round out their education, i.e. either via the up-sell course that's going to be offered or by another means.
Unfortunately some of the subject material covered by these short courses isn't available in your local library and these courses do provide varying levels of useful information. Some I've attended sell 'all the information and support you'll ever need' in the up-sell course. Others I've walked away from with brilliant manuals that I've been really able to get my teeth into.
Like books, some are good and some aren't so good. However these courses aren't cheap and while I'd never suggest you shouldn't attend, I do suggest you respect your dollars and do some due diligence on the course that interests you.
Welcome back and thanks for the PM. As I mentioned in my answer to your PM, just because you're currently living in SA may not rule out your interest in Lease/Options. We live in NSW and now do vendor finance transactions throughout Australia so, if that's the way you want to go, don't let SA rule it out
Your situation is about the same as ours after we did our first 3 or 4 transactions, i.e. we were out of useable equity (money). We say we started the lazy way, i.e. using equity, but it was good to experience the mistakes we made in buying properties and on-selling them.
In the end most of us end up without money wondering where to start or go next. That's when you really 'learn' this business. We ended up with two cores to our business. See jvpropertypartners and negative2positive (in our signature below).
We're also big on suggesting that people getting into this business get some good vendor finance foundational education. However while these courses will give you the 'how to' they sometimes come up short on the 'how to legally'. We setup the Vendor Finance Institute with a range of products and tools to help vendor financiers remain compliant with the rules that regulate the industry.
Regulation of the industry is relatively new and some old hands are resisting somewhat The great thing for someone coming into the industry now is that the regulatory framework we now operate in, will be 'standard' for you. And, believe it or not, we've actually found the regs easy to work with and sometimes they've even made our business easier. Hard to believe I know but that's been our experience.
That's how we started, i.e. we had some equity in our home and we bought some properties and on-sold them with vendor finance (VF). However it didn't take us long to realise that we were just setting up a cash flow business.
We always believed that our long term wealth would come from the equity we own in property. So, initially, we used this positive VF cash flow to support our buy and hold portfolio building. It was later, as the cash flow accelerated that we were able to use the cash flow to support our buy & holds and our lifestyle.
Absolutely agree that many sellers have very traditional attitudes to selling their properties but, so far today, I've had two landlords ring me, interested in selling their poor performing IP's in St. Kilda East, Vic and The Entrance, NSW.
With capital gain as it currently is, we're getting three to four of these enquiries per week.
We find that the primary goal of our buyers is home ownership and, once they're on their way towards that goal via a purchase with vendor finance, their secondary goal is getting the Title in their name and refinancing into a traditional loan, with a lower interest rate.
NSW has had a pretty abysmal capital gain environment since 2004 (sure, not everywhere), so our clients move towards their secondary goals via the deposit they paid and the gradual equity increase they achieve via their P&I loan with us. We usually find our clients are able to apply for a 90% LVR loan, from a traditional lender, at around the end of year 3 to the end of year 5.
If our buyers had Interest Only loans with us, they would have to rely on capital gain to help them refinance in the future. As capital gain has gone 'missing in action' in a lot of areas we stick to only offering P&I loans to our buyers.
As far as I know, no traditional lender, i.e. bank, building society, etc, will allow you to 'compromise their security', i.e. breach their loan agreement. If you look at most standard mortgage documentation, you need to get their approval to renovate the property, sell the property and rent the property, among other things. Obviously both they and everybody else ignores these requirements but the 'banks' put these conditions in the paperwork so they remain in complete control, i.e they like to remain in a position where their mortgage documentation allows them to 'call in' the loan when they feel they need to.
On the other side of the coin, a delinquent loan is bad for a traditional lender's balance sheet. The reality is, if the traditional lender gets paid each month, they remain happy and everybody goes about their business. For example, it's is estimated that 25 to 50 homes per week are sold with vendor finance and this has been happening for years
One of the strange things about traditional lenders' attitude towards vendor finance is the fact that, if you go to any 'branch' you will be told they will not approve what you are proposing. Yet, I have two business associates that got $7 million and $5 million lines of credit from two of the big 4 banks, to purchase residential properties and then on-sell them with Instalment Contracts, while the bank's underlying loan remains in place.
I guess that's the difference between consumer and commercial banking, i.e. one section says no, the other yes. We have built our vendor finance business since 2003 and have never had a challenge with an underlying loan lender. Why? Because we make sure they get paid each month
Also, when asked the following question by an PI insurance underwriter, i.e. '"How does the lender (vendor financier) overcome or address the issue of assignment of property under a mortgage with the financial institution?" the following legal opinion was provided by arguably the most experienced vendor finance solicitor in Australia, Tony Cordato:
'The answer to your question is a technical one – there is no assignment of property in an instalment contract. What happens is that the vendor is entering into a Contract for Sale. It is only on completion that an assignment (known as a Transfer) takes place.
An Instalment Contract is a Contract for Sale with a delayed completion.
The Bank / Lender’s consent is required for all Contracts for Sale, so there is nothing different here from standard procedure.
In terms of timing, a vendor notifies their Bank / Lender that they require a Discharge of Mortgage (by providing a Discharge Authority) shortly before completion is due. I find that Banks will hold open their discharge arrangements for a limited time, each Bank being different. The point is that the Banks do not like being notified a long time beforehand – some like the NAB require completion to take place within about 4 weeks after notification
Therefore, it does not accord with Bank practice to notify a Bank that a discharge is required under a Contract for Sale with a delayed completion until completion is imminent.
If you were helping other people sell their properties with vendor finance, you would be able to operate as a an authorised Credit Representative.
You mention business/trust/individual. This could be three separate legal entities. The question is, when each of these entities is selling it's assets with vendor finance, how many can it sell before ASIC judges these transactions as being done, 'in the course of a business". It is likely that each entity could sell one property with VF and not run foul of the National Credit Code. Some lawyers say you can do three or four before an entity would run up against this problem. Obviously, I suggest you get advice from a lawyer that specialises in vendor finance and the National Credit Code.
Most new vendor finance businesses seem to sell one or two of their own properties and them move onto helping others do the same. This model suits authorised Credit Representative status.
2. All the JV partners we work with keep their existing loans in place. This seems to be the norm.
3. To answer this question you need to know what sort of vendor finance business you will be operating, i.e. will you be selling properties you own or will you be assisting people to sell their properties with VF? More information on this point is available at: https://vendorfinanceinstitute.com.au/home/acl-pack/
4. Have a chat to you accountant about how CGT is handled when selling your PPOR with VF. Do date we haven't run across anyone that's done it. However, regarding the sale of an IP with VF, I believe you're on the right track, i.e. it's treated on an emerging profits basis. There are some ATO rulings to back this up, so check with your accountant.
5. As with the purchase of most IP's, most investors seem to opt for as little money in the transaction as possible. We have some JV partners with 90% LVR loans on their properties and it has certainly increased their cash on cash return.
6. All States except S.A.
7. We use a Family Trust Structure for properties we've sold with VF. As they are positive cash flow, this precludes locking up negative gearing benefits in a Trust. Have a chat with Richard and/or Terry who are regulars on this forum and really know their stuff.
I agree with Richard, i.e. the chances of you picking up the deals you're looking while you're out of the country are remote. Most buyers agents will not have sufficient knowledge of vendor finance to talk a seller or agent through the process.
As an example, here's an overview of the last Deposit Finance transaction we did. We watched the price drop on a particular property until we were satisfied with the asking price. When you are wanting to buy with Deposit Finance, you are asking for Terms, so we don't negotiate on Price. It's hard to get both.
We caught the Agent's attention by letting him know that we would offer the asking price, if the vendor could accept 80% of the money now and 20% later. The Agent said that he 'got that' and would we put it in writing. We did and the vendor accepted a small monthly principal payment, with a balloon after 5 years, with no interest, for the outstanding 20%. We on sold it with an Instalment Contract.
Getting a transaction like this setup remotely is a major challenge. It may be best to forgo some profit in the first and maybe second VF transaction by doing a JV with an experienced vendor financier. It will get you started, you should make a reasonable return and you can think of it as 'on the job training'.
Also, it came as a surprise but we have just found a second tier lender that will do Deposit Finance again.
As your property is not as 'negative' as some I see, I would definitely look into the PAYG tax variation mentioned above, along with some research into how much a depreciation schedule may help.
We went looking for a positive cash flow real estate model in 2002 and stumbled on vendor finance. We got started in 2003 and have stuck with it to date.
We've always believed that our long term wealth is in the equity we have in property so we use the positive cash flow from our vendor financed properties to support our long term by and holds (until they become neutral and positive). Luckily for us this positive cash flow from vendor finance also supports our lifestyle. It may be a strategy worth researching.
We don't utilise traditional real estate agents to market our vendor finance (VF) properties but we've heard of a handful of VF'ers that do. Unfortunately I don't have any real feedback on how that's gone for them. I guess it would depend on what commission rate you could negotiate.
Presupposing the Sellers are willing to wait for their money and that's pretty unusual with a relationship breakdown, I'd help them sell their property to the Buyers, probably with a vendor finance Instalment Contract.
Standing in the middle of such a transaction would require that you look closely at whether you need Australian Credit Licence coverage and possibly Real Estate Agent Licence coverage (depending on what vendor finance strategy you use). Further information on structuring this type of transaction is available at: http://www.negative2positive.com.au
We usually get charged around $1,200 to get an Instalment Contract drawn up by our solicitors. However the incoming buyer pays this cost.
Advertising. We place each property on two free vendor finance (VF) websites and Gumtree (also free). We also place each property on the two main traditional real estate websites. This costs us $150. Our signs out the front of each property cost next to nothing. Our newspaper advertising is always done in the classifieds of small community newspapers and the approximate cost is about $30 per week.
Holding costs. Recently a JV partner bought a property on which he 'settled' on one day and the new VF buyers moved in the next day. However we always plan for 8 weeks of holding costs in this situation. It rarely takes 8 weeks but it's a comfortable contingency.
After a VF buyer moves in, the resulting loan needs to be administered. We have a specialist VF loan administration company do this. However the cost for this service is built into the VF buyers weekly payment.