To narrow down the selection criteria, I like to look at the comparison rates for each loan that I am considering. Comparison rate legislation came in here in Qld this financial year. If you don’t know what a comparison rate is it would be worth while having a read about them. There are a lot of articles around at the moment that go into details. Be wary though that comparison rates do not include unforseeable charges that may be associated with a loan. eg a fee for redraw.
From there, I look for the features in the loan that I need/ will use (so that I am not paying a higher interest rate for features in a loan that I do not need).
Be careful of fixed rates. Usually there will be a break cost if you refinance part way through the fixed term; and usually the expense is greater the longer you have left to run on that fixed term.
Terry is spot on!!! The premium that you pay for LMI is a scale from 80.01% to 97% +. LMI is calculated as a percentage of the loan amount. So the premium that you pay is relatively cheap in the low 80%s[] and can be very epensive at 97%!!.[] Obviously more risk to the insurer as your deposit decreases.
There is also a difference if the lender you are using is a securitised lender or a balance sheet lender. Won’t go into the definitions here. LMI premiums are also reveiwed every 6 months or whenever the LMI market changes (Royal Sun Alliance has recently been down graded and has droppped off the shopping list leaving PMI and GE as the only alternatives.
To give you a guide, I have seen premiums at around 0.21% plus stamp duty at 80.01% loan to value ratio to 3% plus stamp duty at 97% loan to value ratio.
My brain is not working at full speed this time of night, but i seem to remember reading somewhere that contracting to enter into a future contract is not legally binding.
Eg if you were to draw up a contract with a potential wrapee to enter into an installment contract/ lease option agreement in the future, it would not be binding.
I am not sure how Dolf uses his ‘heads of agreement’, but may be worth having a quick chat to your legal team before relying on it.
would be interesting to know if you take this idea further. Keep us posted!!!
Lenders look at two main things when it comes to approving a loan. 1. Equity/ Deposit. 2. Capacity.
You may have money/ assets /equity in abundence, but if you cannot show that you are capable of repaying the loan, you will struggle.
Do you have any other sources of income other than unemployment benefits?
There are more flexibile loans out there/ and more flexible lenders, but be wary of the position that you may be in if you run into a long vacancy periods, a rise in interest rates etc.
Why do you want to avoid cross collateralising your properties? What is your investment strategy?
It is hard to work out whether your scenario relates to cross collateralisation or not. Ask what the security is for your new loan. If it is only the new IP, then it should be a stand alone mortgage.
What the NAB may be doing is increasing your current owner occ loan (topping it up) to pay for the costs + 20% deposit on the new IP. If this is the case then your properties would be stand alone.
If the new loan is over 100% of the value of the investment property, then the properties are most likely cross collateralised (both current home and IP used as security for both mortgages)
It is always handy to have the ersidex report before you start negotiating, but having said that, it you have done your due dilligence, and the cashflow looks good, I would not be overemphasising the purchase price. If you are obtaining finance, ask them to do a full valuation on the property. (Hopefully the offer is subject to finance.)
I would me more worried about inheriting a troublesome tennant than the property purchase price from what you have said.
Good idea to do due dilligence on the tennants as well as the property!
Institutions look at two main criteria when you apply for a loan. Capacity/servicability and Equity/Deposit. These are the limiting factors when you are trying to expand your portfolio (before being maxed out & using Steve’s advice).
The capacity/servicability side of things is all about the question of what size loan can you afford with the income you have, and your current debt commitments. By increasing your income, or the more likely reducing your debts, your potential maximum loan amount increases.
The second criteria is equity/deposit. Great borrowing capacity aloan does not ensure a loan approval. You have to make sure that you have enough deposit, or equity to draw on to cover deposit + costs of these property purchases.
The weaker of these two will ultimately be your limiting factor before looking at accounting structures.
Two last things to mention:
1) Although you are hoping to pool resources with your family, it may be worthwhile looking at your maximum borrowing capacity as individuals (sometimes it is higher this way).
2) Institutions use a servicing interest rate higher than the current interest rate to qualify customers on their maximum lending. ie a banks standard variable rate may be 6.57%, but to qualify a customer for a maximum loan amount it may be 8.07%.
This is only done for internal loans. So if you were to spread your loans with a few dirrerent institutions that would increase your maximum loan amount from a capacity perspective. Also be aware that some institutions are more liberal than others with the amount of lending they will offer.
It is amazing how much valuable information you can gain from a neighbour. Current tennants of potential investment puchases are also a great source of information. I have had a few happily give me a tour of the property pointing out everything that needs attention/ fixing. One of them did a better job than the building and pest inspectors!