Total Members: 159,197

Nat R

  • Nat R replied to the topic Banks close in in the forum General Property 20 years, 5 months ago

    The fact it is on Today Tonight means is will be a complete fabrication anyway.

    As for you commnets about the people with no money being the high net worth individuals of the future…I take your point …..but try going into a BMW dealership and saying I have no money today but I might have some in the future so you should give me a new 5 series…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Banks close in in the forum General Property 20 years, 5 months ago

    People forget that Bank coustomer service levels are actually very high. Look at banking 20 years back and look at what we have now:

    You can use an ATM 24/7
    eftpos
    online banking
    24 hour approval on home loans
    margin lending on shares
    low mortgage margins
    higher mortgage gearing (100% LTV)
    redraw
    LOC
    offset
    the list is endless

    IMHO opinion…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Banks close in in the forum General Property 20 years, 5 months ago

    So this article is about banks doing what they are leagally allowed to do and if they were smarter would do a lot more quickly than they currently do.

    If you are in default (typically you have not made a payment for at least 90 days, more like 180 days) what more can you expect.

    Keep in mind if they are PPOR houses you have many avenues to show…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Is Insurance a SCAM or a NECESSITY? in the forum Opinionated! 20 years, 5 months ago

    Self insurance really only works for bigger companies because they might hav eafleet of 1000 cars and that goves them a porfolio of spread risk. For a person with 1or 2 cars 1 or 2 houses etc it doesn’t work as well.

    Health insurance: if you look at the claims charts you will see that people in their 20 and 30 pay more than they claim except for…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Fixed Rate Break Costs in the forum Finance 20 years, 5 months ago

    They use a term called ‘full economic break costs’ which roughly translates to :

    If I lend you $100,000 at 9% for 5 years and after 2 years you break the loan and I can only relend the money back out at 6% then you owe me the present value (PV) of 3% on $100,000 for 3 years.

  • Nat R replied to the topic LOCK IN V’s VARIABLE ??? in the forum No Subject 20 years, 5 months ago

    A couple of points to note:

    the banks to not set the fixed rates according to what they “think” the rate will be in X years…they go off the money market rate for where they have to lock in funding for fixed rate loans and tehn add their margin. (the rates are published in the AFR everyday)

    As for a stock broker telling you that rates will be…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Reverse mortgage in the forum Finance 20 years, 5 months ago

    Centerlink do them as well !!

    In the UK they are writing billions per year in RVM’s.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Reverse mortgage in the forum Finance 20 years, 5 months ago

    .

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 5 months ago

    Many commercial loans include covenents where the lender can check the financil postion of the borrower every six months and if EBIT or EBITDA fall below a certain level then the loan can be called.

    Keep in mind many commercial loans only have a life of 3 or 5 years anyway.

    BTW I have doubled check with our in house lawyer and you cnanot call a…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum No Subject 20 years, 5 months ago

    How are you all going??? Is anyone able to offer any form of proof that a bank can call a loan??? Or are you just going to go around in circles and criticise me for having the hide to question a statement??

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 5 months ago

    Maybe because nobody questions the stuff on there. ie they believe every thing that is posted is true just because it is on the net.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Low Docs & ATO in the forum Finance 20 years, 5 months ago

    Where did the idea that most are funded offshore come from??

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 5 months ago

    Hey commercial loans are a different kettle of fish to home laonsand I did point out that UCCC loans were not invetsment loans.

    I do note that nobody has been able to show a single piece of evidence that a bank can call a normal home loan just beacause the LVR moves teh wrong way.

    Bring it on clowns

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 6 months ago

    Quote: “Nat, the bank will not forclose a loan as long as the person/persons keep up their repayments.?

    …From memory I think that is what I said upfront.

    If somebody defaults then the bank has every right to step in…that is a world away from the original incorrect suggestion that the bank can call up at tany time and force a sale.

    BTW I’m…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 6 months ago

    Items like this are a matter of fact not opinion.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 6 months ago

    Tim …where do i start?

    UCCC – uniform consumer credit code…no lender can move in a sell a property whilst the borrower is still fullfilling thier obligations to pay and is not in default or arrears.

    For non code loans ie investment loans…what bank in thier right mind is going to wake a sleeping dog i.e. take a performing loan and sell it…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Prices falling Investors running away in the forum General Property 20 years, 6 months ago

    LTV = LVR
    LTV = Loan To Valuation ratio
    LVR = Loan to Valuation Ratio

    You guys are still way off teh mark on negative equity.

    Sure it is a bad thing but if prices are going down who cares how much equity you have in the deal !!

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 6 months ago

    Quote: He told us that many loans written today, have a clause that allows the lender to trigger a mortgage sale if the equity/debt ratio shifts too much.

    …absolute fiction !!

  • Nat R replied to the topic Falling Prices – Negative Equity in the forum General Property 20 years, 6 months ago

    Sorry to say it but your reply makes less sense than your original post.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Prices falling Investors running away in the forum General Property 20 years, 6 months ago

    It really doesn’t matter what LTV you kend people as long as they keep paying.

    Think about it…you lease a car for $30,000 …the next day its worth $28,000 and you owe $29,999. What happens ??

    Do the wheels fall off,,,do they kill your first born son??

    Why are some people so caught up on the LTV???

  • Load More

Nat R

Step 1 - 0% Complete

Fill Out Your Member Profile Below

Fill in the required fields below to complete your registration.

Registration not only grants you full access to this website, but will also enable us to send you our newsletter, latest investor tips, strategies and information about events/products relevant to investors. You can opt out at any time.

Used to log in to the website and for targeting with messages. Alphanumeric characters only. No spaces allowed..

Member Login
Lost your password?
×
159,197

Register Free To Unlock Unrestricted Access To PropertyInvesting.com

×
1-Day Millionaire Mastermind Workshop - Only LIVE Training in 2019!