Is there any change if one was to use a non family member for there equity ?
[]
Michael
It can be done. Depending on the relationship and the evidence of a clear benefit to the person putting up the equity I would consider the NAB.
If no then we need to look outside the square for a lender who will accept a third party security. This which may cost a little more.
Be very careful about who goes on title as this may very well kill the FHOG entitlement for this and any subsequent purchase.
You can take out an investment loan factoring in rental. Then if you change your mind after settlement you can apply for the FHOG direct to the OSR. You need to be comfortable with your change of intention though. Make sure this decision occurs after the settlement so you can’t be accused of telling lies to your bank []
I do have mainstream lenders who will take room rental into account. I did a loan for a student where she rented out the two rooms for $100 pw each as well as living there herself and getting the FHOG…Prob get more in Sydney. Just some food for thought.
1) Yes. Depending on the exact situation but it can be done quite easily.
2) Yes. But it depends on the parents equity input. You will also need to consider other purchase costs.
3) There is no minimum. Check the Office of State Revenue or your states equivalent website for the requirements. You will find that you need to live in it during the first year. There is no min time frame specified.
I think the biggest hurdle you face is your income. There are ways around this as well.
It depends on the lender. Some don’t claw back and others have different time frames. But if they do claw back then I believe it is normally at 100%.
If this is your plan then tell your broker. He should then find you a product that wont penalise you for early payout. Interest rate may not be the number one consideration for you in this case.
If you hide this fact from your broker then he prob wont identify the best loan for you and who can blame him if he doesn’t know the full story.
Would he recommend the best loan for you if he knew he wouldn’t keep the commission? I guess we all have different takes on that one. Build up a relationship with a broker you trust is probably the best advice here.
If you are a buyer then I guess you take wchich ever agent comes with the house []
Heres some ideas if you are a seller. I would go with personal recommendations. Alternatively I would seek out the most high profile well regarded agency in town – poss the one that seems to list all the most expensive homes.
These agencies only employ experienced agents that they often headhunt from elsewhere. They go to great lengths to protect their reputation.
People selling in this price range tend to have been around a while and are often somewhat financially astute. They are probably a good indicator of quality service. The fees may be higher but you usually get what you pay for don’t you think?
If you are still looking for someone in Brisbane drop me an email and I will put you onto a couple of agents who I believe are honest and ethical.
Homepath have a great budget prioduct and I have put clients into them when it meets their needs.
They are slow to settle, slow to communicate and will prob drive you nuts up until settlement!
Once the loan is in place they are great.
There is no offset but they do have unlimited free redraws. Don’t be fooled into thinking that this is the same thing though.
The best bank is really an impossible question. Like asking the best car. It really depends what the individuals needs are. Obviously a 4wd is best for one person and an Excel another…..
The law says he has to present all offers to the vendor who decides which to accept.
No agreement is binding until contracts are exchanged.
These are the realities.
It is up do the vendor to select which offer he will accept. They often accept a lower offer where there are clauses such as subject to sale on the higher offer.
Amycsu I am pleased you got the house.
We shouldn’t perpetuate this ill feeling against all agents – especially when they are doing their job?
By the way I did the RE course out of a personal interest in my own dealings and a professional interest to advise clients. I have never been nor plan to ever be employed as an agent.
Email me your situation and I will let you know if I have any ideas. Then you can apply direct – I am not chasing business from you. Just want to try to help you find something cheaper.
Selling your PPOR will not incur any CGT except in unusual circumstances. Did you rent it out during the period you owned it for more than 6 years? Was it an IP before becoming a PPOR? Did you claim any tax deductions for business use or for subletting rooms. Anything else team? As long as these are all no then I suspect you will be OK.
Now when you move into your IP and it becomes a PPOR. This will not incur any CGT. However you will no longer get any tax benefits from ownership as it isn’t generating income. You will get a CGT reduction for the time you live in it. ie if you own it ten years and only rented it out for five then the CGT will only be calculated on that five years.
CGT is only payable on sale of the property.
I am not entirely sure of the question – but if you pay $100K from the sale of your home into your new home loan this this will not incur any taxation.
If you feel you may be moving from this second property into another without selling it ie converting it back to an IP then might I strongly recommend you pay the money into an offset account which will have the same effect.
This will have significant benefits should you wish to use it to purchase a new PPOR. This is a little more complex and outside the scope of your question so I won’t discuss it now.
Many experienced investors aren’t so keen on them for a number of reasons.
1. They often end up with a lower valuation than the property next door because you have a limited market if you need to sell. This is because it would not be available as a PPOR until expiration of that long lease.
2. The returns are in line with the market roughly. Experienced investors feel they can spend some time to find somethiung better.
They have much that is positive though and I am sure you are aware of those things. They may very well suit your profile with you being out of the country. Their management, although not cheap is very good and you will need to devote little attention to your investment.
I spent years living in Married Quarters when I was in the Army and am quite familiar with them from several different angles. Please feel free to get in touch or post more specific questions if I can help at all.
You know we have more in common than you realise and I wish to apologise as it sounds like I offended you.
I don’t doubt that my analogy was flawed but I guess I was trying to make a point and couldn’t think of anything better at the time. Most analogies are pretty flawed once they are under the microscope. I can’t even think of a better one now – but it has been a long day []
But even after considerable thought I still maintain that it wouldn’t be a worth while exercise to gain accreditation and join with an aggregator just to write your own loan. Especially as you will need PI Insurance which starts at about $1200 unless you get a deal through your aggregator. Unless of course you are borrowing an huge amount – but in that case I am sure you would find a broker willing to rebate much of the fee.
I think adding my details gives me credibility as a poster, I certainly wouldn’t have worded my post as I did had I known you weren’t as naive as I thought you sounded (I mean that in the nicest possible way)! [].
If your goal is to spend money to reduce tax then a pos geared property wont do that.
If you want to reduce your losses each week then a pos geared property will help there.
As RK asked, how many pos geared properties can you afford to own?
I think many people believe that pos geared properties are better than negative geared ones and the holy grail for others is pos geared with great growth!