Hi Glenn & Welcome to the forum,
If you intend to increase the equity in your PPR by way of reducing the loan balance, then I would suggest you look at the benefits of a 100% offset account linked to your loan,
Regarding the honeymoon rate,
I’m not to fond of these as the revert rate after the expiry of the honeymoon period is usually at a much higher rate, you may qualify for a discount rate for the term of the loan depending on the amount being financed, Cheers.
Hi Rob,
To clarify my comment regarding all loans with One lender, I believe its Ok to have multiple loans with one lender, as in a pro pack etc, but at a certain stage it’s a good idea to spread your lending and keep further options open.
Yes I also thought the HSBC decline was strange in light of their liberal servicing criteria,
Agree the MAV package may be ok, depending on size of the portfolio and future investing plans, this could possibly be coupled with the current westpac loan, but again this depends on the total numbers and is all supposition without further info,
Agree also regarding the rates and choice of lenders, Adelaide possibly if they were fixed, as they did have some good 3 year rates a while back, but Interstar?? Why?
Cheers.
I totally disagree with the suggestions of having all loans with the One lender,
For instance, If allymac had all lending with either St George or HSBC, she would still be declined on the basis of being to rent reliant, regardless if the loans were with One lender or spread across multiple lenders,
And in this scenario a refinance to another lender of part or the whole portfolio would be required to access available equity.
Allymac,
With two declines you should have a Mortgage Broker crunch the numbers before submitting any further loan applications, as any further declines/hits on your Baycorp will not make it any easier to get finance approved, Cheers.
Hi Kev,
No need for commercial rates, ANZ will do 4 units on 1 title, and as Rob mentioned St George will also do them and at residential rates,
I am currently doing a 5 on 1 title for a client at residential rates. Cheers.
Hi Markk,
EG, Low Doc 80% LVR 7.24% to a 6.90% revert rate after 4 years, this lender will absorb the LMI.
Alternatively, depending on the term & amount of finance required, it may be more beneficial to pay the LMI and arrange finance with one of the lenders below at the lower rate, Low Doc 80% LVR 6.76%
C) Low Doc 80% LVR 6.99%
D) Low Doc 80% LVR 7.06%
If I publish the name of the lender and the rates I am required to also include the comparison rates, feel free to call or send me an email for the info.
The Exit/DEF fees will be a problem on a short term 90% low doc.
Have you considered raising the LVR on your current STG low doc with another lender? in doing so you may only require an 80% lend or lower on the short term low doc loan you are currently pursuing, Cheers.
Hi Markk,
At 7.32% the STG low doc rate is not competitive,
Also, regarding fixed rates (especially short-term 1-2 years) the revert rate should be taken into consideration.
As Rob mentioned fixed rates may not be appropriate as Marisa is looking to sell on completion,
This thread/scenario also highlights what may be a good choice of lender/product for One may not necessarily be appropriate for another, Cheers.
Hi Marisa,
I think the St George low doc max LVR with interest only repayments is 70% LVR or 80% LVR with P&I, and the LMI premium is applicable over 60% LVR,
With this in mind coupled with there higher low doc rates you may want to look for an alternative lender with a lower rate and will also absorb the LMI up to 80% LVR, while keeping in mind the break costs you may incur. Cheers.
Agreed,
A mortgage Broker will receive less trailing commission on a loan structured with an active 100% offset linked to that particular loan.
As my colleagues have mentioned, P&I or I.O doesn’t make a great deal of difference to a M Brokers trail,
I like to think the majority of Mortgage Brokers have there clients best interest at heart, and those that don’t would not last to long in a profession that is largely built on ones credibility & reputation, cheers.
Markus,
You can borrow above 80% but mortgage insurance will apply over 80% LVR,
A LOC may not be the best option for you as you have non-deductible debt (PPR loan)
As I mentioned before You may want to consider a split loan with an offset linked to the non deductible debt, the PPR split with P&I repayments & I.Only repayments on the Investment split,
The funds from the investment portion of the split loan can be parked in the offset until required for deposits etc. Cheers.
Hi Markus & wellcome to the forum,
Yes your loan repayments will increase if you increase your current loan,
A split loan with an offset attached to your PPR loan may be more beneficial than a LOC, Talk to a Mortgage Broker who understands how to structure finance for property investors. Cheers.
Hi Jen,
Be very careful, the lending institution prepared to finance the highest amount may not necessarily be the right choice of lender for you,
As Rob mentioned talk to a Mortgage Broker, You may be pleasantly surprised to find that you do qualify for the higher loan amount with more lenders than you realize, including the lenders who have told you otherwise,
But more importantly a good mortgage broker will structure your finance with your immediate and long term goals in mind, I believe this should be the main criteria when selecting a lending institution, Cheers.
Hi Steven
Are you suggesting that she goes through different institutions for 2 seperate loans (more fees of course) or just tells the bank that she wants separate loans?
interested from my own point of view
Hi Debtdogg,
Yes that is correct
BTW, I notice you edited your initial post[biggrin]
Hi Lioness,
I would not suggest using the unencumbered property as security on the new purchase,there is no need,
Instead, you could access your current equity and use this as a deposit on 80/20 finance; this will avoid giving the lender 2 properties as security over One loan, (cross colaterisation)
This structure will allow you to borrow 100% finance on the new purchase without the need for mortgage insurance and cross colaterisation, as your LVR on the new purchase will be 80%
An IP savvy Mortgage Broker could set this structure up for you. Cheers.
Hi Jules,
If you don’t require a package then I would look for another more flexible lender who will give you a better discount off the SVR along with lower fees,
I have sent you a PM with some info on a lender for you to consider, cheers.
Hi Jules,
Are you referring to the CBA Pro Mav package with a $300 annual fee or $495 pa for the Mav Plus package, the .5% discount applies to loan amounts between $250K to $349K
You can get .7% discount elsewhere for borrowings between $250K & $500K in VIC without the high annual fee, Cheers.
The lender with the cheapest 1-year fixed rate may not necessarily be the right choice,
Focus more on the long term, i.e. what is the revert rate after the 1 year fixed period expires, does this lender have the products & policy that will accommodate my investing strategy, Cheers.
Well done on the Offset Vs LOC article Rob,
I have long been an advocate of a 100% offset over a LOC, I agree there are times where an LOC has its place in certain situations, however in the majority of cases an offset is a much better option for the reasons you have outlined.
I think part of the reason why so many investors head straight for an LOC over an offset is due to a lack of understanding of how an offset works and the benefits it has to offer, Cheers.
Hi Terrabyte,
No one can accurately predict if interest rates will rise or fall, speculation & hindsight do not go hand in hand,
For instance, if a potential rate rise has the ability to cause financial hardship or severely effect your investment holdings then you may want to consider fixed rates or have a portion of your loans fixed.
There is a graph on my web site under interest rate trends, http://www.mobilemortgagemarket.com.au
Click on the variable and the 2 & 5 year fixed buttons to view the average rates from April 04 to May 05
I am not advocating fixed or variable rates, when all is said and done it’s a matter of personal choice/circumstance, most of the time it will depend on your SANF (sleep at night factor)
Regarding equity in your PPR,
Ensure you structure the loan correctly, keep the deductible debt (investment portion) and non-deductible debt (PPR portion) separate, you can achieve this via a split loan. Cheers.