Hey Gengis, as you said, it’s better to be given $7K as a freebie towards your costs than not receiving any handout at all, which I think is the way the majority of us on this board started.
As for ‘affording’ it, it comes into our calculations when working out whether or not we can afford to invest. It is a ‘Cost of Doing Business’, and if we don’t have it, we cannot afford to do the business.
Hey crashy, glad to see you’re still around (like your course too so far!!)
Would you not be better off, and certainly positively geared if you ‘build’ the bottom unit, and rent them both out? I have a place at the moment that has an upstairs and a downstairs two bed unit, and they do really well – much better than what a single house of same purchase price returns.
As to how easy it is to strata and sell off, I think it depends on your council. It may not be possible depending on their rules.
If you can, find and purchase a property that gives you money back, rather than the other way around. There are quite a few kiwis that post regularly on here, and one thread that might interest you is
You might find that your borrowing capacity at the moment could be substantial! I suggest finding one of the mortgage brokers on this site, and dropping them an email. I think Melanie is in Brisbane, so would be probably the closest if you wanted a face to face meeting.
Hey SIS, why don’t you have a look at the newspaper, or http://www.mortgagemagazine.com.au , and contact one of the firms that are advertising. there are an awful lot out there advertising, and I’m sure they’ll be only too happy to let you know their requirements.
The ato does not care what the security is – you could borrow against your stamp collection if somebody would lend to you.
The interest is only tax deductible when the purpose is investing. The only thing to be aware of when borrowing against your PPOR is that if there is any other debt at all – KEEP THEM SEPARATE. This will save a whole lot of hassles later on – accounting wise, and taxation wise.
Hi C2, yes I did read your post, and noted your questions. I did not know that ‘job’ was not a oft used word in America, as every American I have worked with/spoken to/listened to (like the Kiyosakis etc.) have all said job.
My post was more to clarify with jmskim that we are in fact mainly Aussies, mainly buying here (and of course our sad NZ cousins too – due to the Rugby), and to others that are immediately assuming that he wishes to purchase in Aust.
Any extra cash that I get from refinancing I will put in my one LOC (if you haven’t got one, then choose One IP that has a redraw, saves on fees if you need to redraw from one place rather than several). Oh yeah, do it in the highest interest rate loan too.
This way you have all the cash in one place, are still reducing the interest (increasing cash flow), and can redraw to purchase as and when you are ready.
Actually, if you are borrowing the money against a property (is it PPOR?) you would pay interest for it anyway, so you probably wouldn’t save anything by then paying it off the IPs.
Yes Poltergeist you are correct. If you had read my stax of stats post though, you would have seen that I have no kids, and I think I said one nephew. And it’s the ‘doting parents’ who are sitting with Cameron, smiling down.
Westan, I think one of my loans is fixed at 5.67% or something like that possibley for three years.
I’m currently looking at moving four of my properties away from a mortgage originator to one of the big banks – and getting 80% lend on value. I’m looking at either a professional package with one of them, (esp for the .5-.7% discount) or the best interest rate I can get, which may involve fixing the rates, cos these places are long term holds, and the extra cash I pull out will go into a LOC.
I did have one other loan on a fixed rate, but of course that was the property I sold most recently[].
A ‘quick and dirty’ calculation based on the .25% rise showed that on our combined loans, that’s an extra $8K per year!! So the next .5% will be another $16K. That’s a lot of rent to have to raise!
So yes, I do agree with your other post about fixing some rates, but they would have to be less than 7% fixed or I won’t go near them, and I’m unsure as to the length I wish to fix.
Shaun, where are you? 152 reads, but no response from you!!
It might be just me, but I’m guessing that jmskim stopped by this site, not thinking that it was an Aussie site, and not with the intention to invest in Oz. The .com, rather than .com.au has given us a few Americans/Canadians in the past who thought this was an American site.
I would suggest you do a bit of reading (in the States there seem to be millions of books on how to buy property), and perhaps attend a course or two (john burley, robert kiyosaki, robert allen are a couple who spring to ming).
Also talk to some accountants (www.sageintl.com) regarding how best to be structured. With the number of lawsuits in your country, I would suggest that you could be a target, not only as a physician, but just because you will be seen to have money, and I’ve seen that one of the easiest ways to become a millionaire in your country is to sue someone who has a couple of million.
Congratulations on graduating, and good luck with your career. I’m sure that one of your major debts is now your school loan, so maybe look to pay that off as soon as you can.
The investors who are selling will outnumber the investors who are buying by a good proportion. If it is true that only 10% of properties are cash positive, then the ration of neg to pos is 9:1.
If only 1/2 of these negatively geared investors want to sell, that’s a huge number, and if there are no other investors willing to come in and lose money, the prices will have to fall, and there will be less rental properties available.
The more they fall, the more that some negatives will come round to the positive side, which is good for those investors who are left, and still have cash or borrowings available.
The yanks did abolish their negative gearing in 1986, and it led to the scenario above. It took them years to recover, but they did not reintroduce the negative gearing.
Our government learnt some of those lessons in 85-87, (I don’t think the law was retrospective) there were less people purchasing investments, and so there was less (not less, but not growing to keep up with numbers requiring accomodation) available for rent, and public housing waiting lists skyrocketed.
It says ‘split-loan case finally resolved’, but it goes on to say that the High Court has granted the ATO an appeal against the Federal Court decision.
So to me, that means another court battle in the High Court over the same issue.
Muppet, I thought your cricketers were called the Black Caps (?). You are talking about them beating India for a chance to play Australia in the finals aren’t you?[]
Oh, I think you might mean the Rugby team.[]
It’s not my fault, it was like that when I got here!
Hey Phil, 94 reads, and still no sign of Shaun!![^]
Jake, self doubt is understandable. Check out the posts by fudge on his strategy – he’s only a young fella too (bit older than you, but still a ‘baby'[] – now please you youngsters, don’t take offence, it’s a joke!).
Also check out still_in_school (I think he means Uni/Tafe, so again older than you) but he’s managed to acquire 11 Properties this year, while working part time and studying.
The world is your oyster. If you are serious about succeeding you will. If you listen to everybody else around you who’ll tell you you are too young (which you probably are just now, but if you work out your plan and aim towards that, you’ll be better off than 99% of your mates who just spend all their money), then re read what some of the young guys on here are doing.
Cheers
Mel
Viewing 20 posts - 1,961 through 1,980 (of 2,396 total)