A deposit bond is often used for OTP purchases as otherwise you would tie up your cash for potentially a long period of time. However, you can still use them for shorter settlements, if your money is tied up in a term deposit for a further 2 months etc., or if you need to settle on your sale before having cash to purchase.
It means at settlement you basically have to cough up full price, so you don’t get out of paying the deposit, but it can delay it if you can do other things in the meantime with your cash.
ricky, there have been quite a few posts regarding trusts etc. on this site, but for personal preference I have just purchased Dale Gatherum Goss’s Tax Battles, and Trust Magic manuals. They are available from http://www.gatherumgoss.com. It appears that many people are willing to travel long distances or communicate via fax/email/mail with Dale in Melbourne, so he must be a bit of a god.
Other than those, try to get hold of some of N.E. Renton’s books on trusts – they can be cures for insomnia though – I’ve had to read one a couple of times to fully grasp the concept.
As for being a bit bitchy, guilty[], but only once or twice! Other posts that have ‘sparked my ire’ I read over a few times, and then ignore them. I’m not generally into having a go at people – especially ones I don’t know.
And yes kkowalsk it was my decision to invest, and I’m being proactive in attracting tenants, which is why I want them to sign a lease. It is no different to the peace of mind one can get from fixing part of the interest rate. I’m sorry that it appears all your landlords have been b#&*@rds, but I look after mine. Why is it that you are looking at this site again?
I disagree with $400 being a ludicrous amount to spend on a depreciation schedule. It will give you amounts that can be depreciated far in excess of just the carpet.
Barbara, you need a Quantity Surveyor to prepare the report for you on what you can claim – it should certainly help come tax time, and may not be as absolutely critical to have full rental (might provide some leeway). Leave the curtains up, you can depreciate them too – and as Peter says, you’ll be spending more money for no real gain.
Perhaps I did not word my post as well as I intended.
I think Michael is still very much a little kid, and very much acts as a little kid, doing what they do. At a young age, it is just play, nothing sinister.
But at Michaels age, people decide to take it the wrong way – plus because of who he is, they immediately see $$$ signs. I’ve heard said that in America the quickest way to becoming a millionaire is to sue one!!
I also did not mean that I like every single song that he has ever released. I doubt I have heard more than 1/4 of them.
Vivarto, this is something that I have been looking at doing in some of my properties – but I’d look at doing the whole ‘home theatre’ bit, and would purchase rather than lease. Cost about $8K wholesale, value about $15K. Would look at borrowing the money as part of the mortgage (IO of course), and so it really doesn’t cost that much per year, and you can depreciate it.
Projector preferably embedded in the roof, remote control screen that rolls away etc. etc. When I get my own house I’m definitely going to have one for myself!
Let them bring on the margin calls. I will have no problems. If I refinance to get my free property, it’s hard to see how I will get into trouble when I’m leaving 20% equity still untouched. I also do not need to ‘spend/invest’ that money I have pulled out. It can sit in an offset account until there is something I do wish to buy that will make me money, and as Westan pointed out, they are still out there. It’s not just the interest rates that have cooled the market a bit, it was bound to happen anyway, nobody could sustain the bull run forever.
You won’t get any extra tax back as the others suggested, and if you try, the taxman will come down on you like a tonne of bricks.
However, I noticed that your IP is P&I. While you have PPOR debt, I would definitely change that back to IO, then you’ve got an extra $92pm to go off your PPOR. An extra $1000 per year would certainly make a dent.
I don’t think it’s only a killing when you sell. I refinance to grab that equity for other investments, and can ‘effectively’ have just got a property for ‘free'[]
kkowalsk I disagree. What if the market is over supplied? There are 20 places for them to choose from. You know that they’re going to leave within a short period of time, but you don’t know exactly when.
You have a tenant that wants the place within a month, for 12 months, but if they can’t have it, they’ll go somewhere they can, and you’re left with one of the 20 places now vacant.
My brother has just applied for and been offered two properties within the past week. He’s currently unemployed. One was OK, and would have accepted a 6 month lease when pushed (they’ve now dropped the rent by a further $10 per week as my brother didn’t take it). The second place (he only applied for the two) wanted my folks to go guarantor, which they did. Three days after application, he’s moved in.
Westan, I didn’t think that a corporate trustee added asset protection. I thought it just separated the properties more fully from your own holdings.
We have a corporate trustee, and my reasoning is that it’s a lot easier to change the directors, and therefore who controls the trust without having to change all the mortgages/titles as you mentioned.
I can’t remember the other reasons why the Company was good, it’s been a while since I looked at it. I’ve just purchased Dale GG’s Trust Magic though, so I reckon that should ‘re-enlighten’ me.
Quick Q. Do you have more than one trust? Or do you have all properties in the one?
You’ve got to wonder about his childhood though – I think he is a Peter Pan and that’s why he created Neverland in his home. He really does not sound like he has grown up, which is dangerous when he wants to play with little boys (as little boys do) – cos he isn’t one anymore!!
Yeah, I read most of the AFR while I was waiting in line at the supermarket. What did I get wrong in my post?
In regards to the story not finished, I was talking about what will unfold in the next few weeks/months.
I agree that Henry was a tad (OK, a LOT) greedy, but he did have some good concepts in his teachings. It was all ‘too easy’ though in the way he presented it, without the risks.
I don’t think all have closed. It’s interesting to note that the recievers were called in by a company that was owed $7m or more by NII. The company that is owed the money is also owned by Henry Kaye, so it looks like he called the receivers in on himself!! It might be a way to avoid paying back the refunds that ASIC told him to do.
I don’t think this story is quite finished with yet.
redwing, check the tenancy rules in your state. I know in ACT that if we have ‘no reason’ to ask the tenant to leave, we give them 6 MONTHS notice. If we or a family member wants to move in, or we want to renovate, we have to give them 2 months notice.
They only have to give us the 21 days, but it’s a heck of a lot harder for us to get them out that quickly.
‘Nothing Down for the 90s’ ? Written by Robert G. Allen of ‘Multiple Streams of Income’ and most recently ‘The One Minute Millionaire’ fame.
I thought it was a good read (been awhile though – I like his book ‘Creating Wealth’ better). It’s very American, but if you take out the strategies that don’t work here, it still gives good ways of buying the properties. No money down does not mean no cash, it just means ‘not mine’. Gives a few good tips on how to raise some cash when needed.
The 11 sec sol is a filtering tool, that is telling you what your rental yield is, and is a good indicator of whether or not a property will be cash flow positive. If int rates keep rising, it will not be such a good indicator.
Your CoCR is a totally different beast, and this is where you can do your own subjective analysis to see if you are happy with that return, or if in fact you could beat it elsewhere (ie the bank), and/or get CG as well.
I don’t think I’d go for an equity deal with a bank! The figures I saw said that they covered 30% of the purchase price (say $30K for a $100,000 place), but took 60% of the value down the track (say $120K to your $80K if the property values at $200K. You pay in $70K, and get $80K back – no thanks!)
Cheers
Mel
Edited after seeing Craig’s comments.
PP is $100K. You put up $70K. Now valued at $200K, so the bank takes their $60K cut of that.
You end up with $110K, bank has $90K. Still doesn’t look good to me, although a little better than my initial figures!