fullout, if you have an option to buy a house at $120K, you do not have to have and/or nominee at all to onsell that property at $140K. You are merely onselling your option.
If you don’t want to pay stamp duty, you either have to get your buyer to pay you the $20K extra for the option, or you need to somehow convince the seller to sell to the other guy for $140K and give you $20K (could happen, but need to convince the seller why they should).
Otherwise, you do a simultaneous settlement, where you pay your stamp duty, but walk away with your profit without having to explain to anybody what you were going to make beforehand.
In fact, there’s a thing that Dolf de Roos does at his seminars, where he holds up a $100 note says, ‘Who will give me $50 for this?’. People put up their hands saying ‘I will’ (although not all did), and eventually one guy gets up and runs down the front, gives dolf the $50, and gets the $100.
When asked why others did not do the same, some of the replies were ‘It sounded too good to be true!’ Or ‘I thought you were having a lend’.
I think you’ve just got to keep at it, and if it sounds too good, look a little closer, and if it is too good – GRAB IT!
I went to private schools – Catholic ones, so they weren’t quite as expensive as some!!
As for which is better, I think for a bright kid who will do the work no matter what, either is good, but for one who needs some gentle ‘prodding’ MOST (definitely not all, and conversely, some public schools also) private schools provide that bit extra discipline required for these kids.
It depends on whether or not you are happy in your house, or desperately want a different one to live in.
I would stay as you are (if you are happy) and concentrate on buying IPs.
If you do think you will move in the future and rent out your current house, I would suggest you only pay the minimum off your loan, but put all money into an offset account. This way, should you move, you can then take that extra money to use in the purchase of your new PPOR, and the other debt becomes tax deductible.
Rugbyfan, from what I’ve seen/heard I don’t think Steve is big on selling places.
I think (stats from sometime in the last three months) Steve told Today Tonight/ACA/some current affairs show that he now has 160 properties, 40 of which are wrapped.
This story has been done before – especially the Cheryl Benson saga.
Rick posted (or was it Michael) the transcript from his interview with Ben a while ago, and reading it you could guess which bits they would put to air – which they duly did.
Wrapping is not banned in WA, you just need to get a credit providers licence. Wrapping is banned in SA, not because of Steve, or Rick or John Burley, but because of a shonky developer in the 1970’s!!
Leo, it’s a matter of refinancing, either with the same bank, or a different bank, depending on how you want to structure it, and who offers you the best deal.
Even if you have an LOC as you mentioned, it is at a set level when you set it up. To access more equity, you still have to go to the bank to refinance, and increase the limits.
Also, you’ll find that most banks have a level that they’ll lend to before they get uncomfortable. You might want to have a couple of different banks on the go, so your options are better.
Alexander, I was hoping somebody else had some advice here.
I would suggest you look at the newspapers etc. for jobs in the real estate industry, or contact some of the larger agencies direct.
As for mortgage broking, the professional magazine, (can’t remember what it’s called, but it has been mentioned on this site before) is full of ads for people who want to be a broker.
Check out http://www.seek.com.au. I think it’s got jobs in all industries and locations.
SIS, I used tpg for dial up access, and in fact still have that account so I have my email address. It’s 9.99 a month, with an 80Mb download limit.
We ‘inherited’ Telstra broadband, so didn’t look into TPGs, but I have been told by somebody else who uses their broadband/cable/ADSL (don’t know which, or if they offer more than one) that it is excellent.
I see no reason why it’s a bad thing if you’ve done all your research etc.
The only thing that I would advise is to get a loan for the deposit and costs from your spare equity as a second loan, and only get 80% against the new property. This will avoid cross collateralisation, and perhaps save you from some hassles in the future.
My opinion is that you will have to pay CGT – our government wouldn’t let anybody get away with that. As for the rates, I wouldn’t know, hence the accountant advice.
were they all your ‘out of pocket’ expenses, or were they inclusive of depreciation, and only the ‘taxable’ losses.
As xyzzy says, you need to look at it from a cashflow viewpoint, rather than just what the accountant says for your tax return.
Also, if they are LOCs, you could always let the ‘losses’ build up a little, using the spare equity to pay for it, until the rents start increasing enough to cover all costs.
My first priority would be to establish the actual cash position.
Tony, if you are at all thinking of renting out the house, and buying another to live in, I would suggest that instead of paying as much as you can off the loan, make minimum repayments, and have an offset account for all the extra you would put in.
This way, if you do decide to rent it and buy another one, you use the money in the offset account to buy your new PPOR, and the loan on the current house becomes an IP.
Remember, if you pay off the current loan, and then reborrow to buy your new PPOR, it will not be tax deductible, but by doing it the way I outlined, the entire loan (that remains on the house) will become tax deductible.
Cheers
Mel
Viewing 20 posts - 1,741 through 1,760 (of 2,396 total)