Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1,721 through 1,740 (of 2,396 total)
  • Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    I have 8, buy and hold. I really don’t like to sell[:(], but have had to recently as they weren’t good investments.[:(]

    Also got 6 under contract, with 4 completing sometime in 2006. Might sell 2 of them.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Barbara Smith of taxpayers Aust suggested two ways, one of which I didn’t hear[:(]

    The other way is to have the Super Fund as 1st Mortgagee, which means that the bank has to agree that the SMSF will get all its money back before the bank then gets any. good luck with the banks on this one!!!

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    riff

    It depends on the age of the property as to how much the depreciation will save you. If it’s post 1985/7 you can claim 4/2.5% of the actual building cost.

    If it’s pre that time, you can only claim depreciation on any renovations, carpets, curtains, HWS, stoves etc. etc. etc.

    You need to get a quantity surveyour to prepare a report for you to see how good it will be.

    If it is a post 85 house, I reckon depreciation should cover your losses – but don’t quote me on that!![:P]

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    NATS, why don’t you look at buying the house that your sister wants, and renting it to her? She gets the house she wants, and you get a (hopefully) reliable tenant, and an IP for yourself.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Dolf de Roos is a Kiwi, who’s lived in Australia, and many other countries while growing up.

    His first house was in NZ. He went to all the four banks (at that time) that offered student loans ($1000 a pop). He didn’t tell them that he was also applying for the other loans, and not one of them asked him what he was going to use the funds for. If they did, he would have been in trouble, and wouldn’t have got the loan.

    He then spoke to 20 banks before he found one that would then lend him the rest of the finance top purchase the property he wanted. The interest rate he was charged was 24%!!! Which was OK, cos his yield at the time was 27%. Then rates came down, and his return got better and better.

    I agree, the first deal is really the hardest. I was lucky enough that my parents let me use the equity in their place – and basically went guarantor.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    quote:


    $200,000 divide by 769 = 260.7 x 2 = $520.00
    $520.00 per week for a $200,000 house!


    quote:


    The rental figures may seem high, but thats what you have to aim for, if you want positive cashflow.


    Fully financed, a $200K loan at 7% IO = $270 per week. Are you seriously telling me SIS that the ‘other’ costs for this property are going to amount to $250 per week, or $13040 per year – for rates, body corp, land tax etc?

    I don’t think so Tim.[:)]

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Hi Tanya/Simon

    I think the lower rate would be cheaper. The extra $130 a month sounds like it is coming from your ‘savings’, and therefore would be saving you 7.07% interest on the $130, which is about $1 per month.

    Basically

    Loan at 5.79% interest = $241.25 per month.
    Loan at 7.07% interest = $294.58 per month.

    Your interest saving on the lower rate is $50 per month. You will ‘save’ $0.76 per month per $130 you have in the offset account. Not really going to put a dent in the $50.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Thanks Terry

    Ask an easy question next time!![:)]

    Roughly calculating on the last years results, and noting I’ll allow about 3 minutes for the subsequent downloads, I would say about $20 – for a 10 hour week. So, cheaper than purchasing. As for time spent actually reading it, well, that would be considerably more!![:)]

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Paul, anything that you borrow to build your new PPOR will be non tax deductible no matter what the security.

    If you have not already got an offset account for your PPOR, set one up, and pay all extra repayments into that account – not off the loan. If you can, refinance now to interest only.

    That way you might be able to keep the loan at $100K, which will be all tax deductible (providing that that money was only used to purchase the house, and not to consolidate other debts) when it becomes an IP. Any extra money you have put in your offset account will then be used to pay towards your new PPOR debt.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Hi Guru

    I’m here, but I’ve just not been able to turn on the computer much the last few days. Plus I need to do my christmas shopping soon…

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Yep, Matt I got them to work. But I had to download three of them a second time.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Kavita

    If you’re going to use a PM, I would talk to them now, and specify a date it will be available. January is one of the busiest renting periods for Canberra – by Feb, those who are coming with families of school age need to know where they’re living.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Thanks Matt

    You’re a champ!

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Karan

    With the building depreciation – it doesn’t matter that there’s already 10 years gone – you claim a flat 2.5% (or 4% for some) depreciation on building cost.

    You will find that the higher depreciation in the first couple of years is cos of the fixtures and fittings. Your QS will come in and put a value on all of them for you, and yes, some will be quite low value, but presumably some should have been replaced due to age etc. You can still get some good claims yourself.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Shaun, what you talking about?

    If you can prove that the trip you took was for IP purposes, then entire airfare and accomodation is claimable. If you only go to see one property, and spend three nights, you’d best have good reasons – ie, day 1 visit property with manager, day 2 do research in area, night 3 is body corporate meeting or something.

    If you can’t justify, then it will be hard to explain in an audit.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    It is my understanding that if you move out of your PPOR and rent it out, the loan is then completely tax deductible.

    EXCEPT, where you have increased the borrowings to do other things. ie, the only part of the loan that is deductible, is that which actually was used to purchase the house (and maybe renos.). Definitely not the ‘debt consolidation’ or the overseas holiday.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    confused, click on the Profile tab at the top of the page. then you can choose whatever name you want.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    If you’re asking is it illegal – then no, of course not.

    It would be very wise to have permission from your landlord if you wished to sublet though – I think you can probably be kicked out for breaking terms etc. if you do not.

    I don’t know how often it is done in Australia, but my guess is quite a bit. It’s a way of getting round some of the councils rules that say you can only have one dwelling on the land etc. If you have a ‘granny flat/downstairs flat’ etc., you simply have the upstairs people on a ‘head lease’ and the downstairs is subletted through them.

    It is also what you must do if you want to do a ‘sandwich’ lease option, which is where you lease with option to purchase from vendor, and then turn around and sub lease with option to purchase to somebody else.

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Poor Arty. What is he going to do with all his spare time now!! Can’t even research for those properties.

    He might have to start making lots of interstate phone calls to all his friends – no, he should call Muppet in NZ – international, even better!!

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Anoto, I suggest you contact Bruce Whiting of the Mint Group. He presented at Dolf de Roos seminar on the weekend, and made a very big point of talking about having your structures set up in each country you are investing in. http://www.mintgroup.com.au

    If you buy in an Australian entity in NZ, you lose an awful lot of the benefits that are provided in NZ – like the no CGT, Land Tax, Stamp Duty etc., and we have much higher personal tax rates here than there.

    Cheers
    Mel

Viewing 20 posts - 1,721 through 1,740 (of 2,396 total)