Somebody mentioned on here recently that the Govt is looking to change the rules so that you MUST reside for a minimum of 6 months to keep the FHOG. Jan 1 was the date mentioned.
So I would check with the authority in your state to see if that has happened. Otherwise, I think 3 months would be a good time, and you would need to be able to supply a reason for leaving if they come to question you. Looks like too many people have been ‘abusing’ the system.
Adrian, I believe that paying rates etc. is still a ‘cost of doing business’ of owning IPs (as long as they’re not your PPOR rates[]), so yes in this case the interest is claimable.
If you get 12 mo int free, I’m not sure if you can then borrow it to pay yourself back and claim it. Best get advice on that. I’m thinking the answer is no
If you can sit down and do some figures for them, to show them the income they could get from the property/ies, and any growth etc. that would help to supplement their retirement lifestyle, that may help sway your Dad.
My parents bought their first IP at 47, and have since purchased another 4, stopping in 2001, so the growth since has given them a really nice equity position, and the rentals supplement their super quite nicely.
SIS, I hope that this is the job that you are soon going to be working at only 4 days a week – it doesn’t sound like it’s that much fun. I hope there are some good points to it (other than that they pay you each week!).
we have mobile phone pagers, that go off when a security breach has occured, internal alarm system and armed security guards at our work running frantic around and then external outside security, calling up due to their systems showing a panic alert, followed by police…..
First question is whether or not you would be happy to move? Also whether you want to go from being able to put as many holes in your walls as you like, to having to ask if you can put any holes in at all to hang pictures etc. Also the chance of having to move on every couple of years as your landlord decides to sell/move in/renovate etc. etc.
If you do decide to move out and rent, and rent your place, remember that you could keep it as a rental for 6 years before it would become subject to CGT. If it’s in a good growth area, perhaps it’s a good idea to keep it.
As Steven suggested, you could get a LOC, or an offset account against your home, and use it to fund the deposits on your new IPs, only borrowing 80% against them. This may increase your repayments, but if you focus on your portfolio being positive, rather than individual IPs, it could be a good balance (remember, you are getting rent for your house, against which there is no loan).
Also, if you sell, you’ve got all the selling costs, so that will take a chunk of your cash anyway.
Happy Bandit, remember that for Steve to accumulate 130 properties, that there was actually Steve and Dave AND their wives.
So they would have used a lot of cash that they earnt through other means to fund deposits. They did also do wraps to get started (Steve mentions that, although briefly, in the book). This enabled a cashflow, plus $7-10K from the purchaser each time to go towards the next purchase price. Unlike now, that money alone was almost enough to pay for the next place (with a 80% loan).
To work out what’s best for you, you have to work out what’s best for you []. Steve’s is a shining example, but we all (most) can’t realistically expect to mirror his success in the same time frame.
Personally, I have rarely used my cash to fund the next purchase, which effectively means that I borrow 100% finance. Doing this, you either need to make sure you’re going to be working for a few more years yet (if -ve cashflow it’s got to be funded from somewhere), or make sure that the rent and any other income will cover all expenses.
If you can save surplus cash, and use some equity (if the properites grow that is), then you could have the best of both worlds, and expand your portfolio a bit quicker. As I said, it’s what will let you sleep at night how fast you want to go.
Thanks for the big welcome. I’m thinking that there must be quite a few of us out here that don’t have a life – to be spending New Years Day on the computer!!!
My New Years was good thanks. Went to a friends place, had a nice bbq, and played some board games up til 12. Then home, check to make sure the dogs haven’t gone absolutely nuts cos of the fireworks (they had, and made a mess everywhere, and scratched mum’s arm trying to stop my dog jumping the fence!), and fall into bed.
hissho, there’s been a bit of discussion previously on this guy – I think it was good, but I haven’t seen/heard of him other than on here, so I can’t comment.
Do a search and you should come up with something.
Guess it happens in any deal tho doesn’t it? … 10 of us paid 290K to 330K each and the 4 developers paid 150K each and got the pick of the uints. We subsidised them over 600K (150K each.) Between the 10 of us, that’s 60K added to our initial price isn’t it?
Perhaps this is a. why they develop, or b. the way they wish to take their profit, rather than cash in hand. I think there were some excellent tax advantages doing it this way (although I believe the rules have now been changed so they would be taxed on the place as if they sold it anyway). So your prices were fair, and they used their profits to acquire ‘cheaper’ units for themselves.
You’re right about the same happening in most deals. I guess it just grated that they can’t be upfront, and say, we get $x so that we can provide all these services to our club members, and the Support Members and the Branch Managers etc. all get $x from each deal that they introduce – a ‘paypacket’ for their time for want of a better description.
It reminded me a bit much of the two tier marketing scam that I got hit with in the early 90’s – to see how much the ‘introducer’ got at settlement was staggering also.
If you look at it closely, I reckon they would make handsome money from their ‘in house’ mortgage business, they get the ‘commission’ from the developers, what sort of ‘kickback’ comes from their ‘preferred’ PMs?, QSs, Solicitors etc.?
As my understanding of trusts goes – a unit trust has ‘units’ that are similar to shares in a company. You can borrow to buy these units, and claim the interest as a tax deduction against your income from the trust. The income is distributed strictly in accordance with ownership.
A family/discretionary trust does not give you the same tax benefits for borrowing and lending money to the trust. In a unit trust, effectively, you can claim a loss in your personal income tax return (where the interest claimed for the money you borrowed is more than the ‘profit’ distributed from the trust). The trust will profit, becuase it does not have a loan to service.
So when you combine the two types of trusts, you can borrow funds to buy units in a Hybrid trust and distribute income and ‘negatively’ gear in your personal tax return. At a later point, the trust can then borrow money against the asset (it owns it, and was letting you use the asset as security), and pay you back for your units. At this point, the discretionary part kicks back in, and you can distribute the profit to any beneficiary. when there are units oustanding, profits are paid as per a unit trust.
SIS’s point is valid when claiming the cost of the repair/improvement, but as far as my knowledge extends, the interest on your loan is still tax deductible. Always check with your accountant[]
Adrian, if the money is spent on ‘earning’ your income you can claim it.
Rates, renos etc. are a ‘cost of doing business’ and therefore should be claimable. Confirm with your accountant of course.
If you can add more value by doing the ‘reno’ first and then getting it revalued, you might be better off to go that way if you can afford it first. Although I don’t think a loan to ‘pay yourself back’ is then tax deductible (see disclaimer above[]).
You could of course pull the extra $$ out to purchase more property, and then it would be claimable.
Fibejebe, as long as you do your own DD, and everything still stacks up on the property – including rentals, and what other units are selling for, then you should be fine.
That’s what it boils down to I guess, and if it all works then your ‘spotters’ get their fee. I do think it’s a tad high for the Investors Club, (and don’t really appreciate their non discolusre) but if the price is still good, and the developer is willing to pay them that much, then that’s really his choice.
The other thing is – it did not look like you were buying HK’s property. It was a separate company who ‘dealt with developers’ and negotiated discounts by taking out the developments etc. – students were offered the chance of a ‘finders’ fee if they could find a good site for this company to then tie up – giving even more ‘credence’ to the fact that they were a separate company etc.
It wasn’t until early last year that I really twigged that they were selling HK’s own properties when they started selling ‘Oasis’ in St Kilda Melbourne – which were the units he secured for $88.2M using ‘none of his own money’. I was never interested in their properties anyway – but they keep ringing me – even a couple of weeks ago! – and this just sold it for me that I was right not to want their ‘discounts’ (hah!)
Sorry Fibejebe to go off track, but I have read the Administrators report into the ‘collapse’ of NII, and in fact there was no such thing.
NII was the biggest ‘cash cow’ in the world. It had lent money $29.5M (to HK’s ‘Property Corporate Services P/L) -unsecured, and $6M (to HK’s Group Corporate Services P/L) -secured. Even when HK called the administrators in, it had just transferred $417K between June and Nov 03 to PCS, so it only had about $6K in the bank.
NII P/L owed $12m to NII Group Holdings Pty Ltd (also HK’s) – secured. I think this company, ie Henry himself, called in the debt to avoid paying the refunds to people who were claiming they had been sold ‘ASIC Approved’. I doubt he thought that it would go this far, but I still believe he will walk away relatively unscathed. Contrary to popular belief, there was not a ‘lot’ of advertising based on ‘ASIC approval’.
The biggest ‘undoing’ was when the ACCC got involved over his millionaire challenge – which I thought was interesting when it was at a similar time to Steve’s challenge.
Si, I personally would recommend you rent for a while before buying. The market here is slowing considerably, and there are many more properties available in the sub $300K bracket than there were 3 months ago. There are also quite a few apartments coming online, and some I think that have come online that still have rental vacancies (about 500 I’m guessing). This will lead to a fair bit of an oversupply for the moment, so you might find you could get a good deal to rent.
As spider said, check out allhomes, but if you know where you will be working, I would recommend you live close to work if you can – it’s much easier. Definitely don’t live in Tuggeranong if you will work in Belconnen and vice versa.
Cheers
Mel
Viewing 20 posts - 1,601 through 1,620 (of 2,396 total)