I would have thought that your local bank was still a good place to go – they know clients that ‘might’ be in trouble, which is way before the repossession phase, and there could be a win-win involved if the people can sell to you before the bank takes it back.
Cheers
Mel
Where did SIS’s posts go? Now I demand a recount on his posts!![]
Freedom, you could use the money from the sale of land to pay off your PPOR. Then you reborrow, or use as security to purchase IPs. this makes it tax deductible debt.
Don’t let the tenants know you are the owner – get it managed by a RE company.
Is the TV show ‘The Block’?
If you buy more properties in other areas later on you will be diversified. If you have done your research on your area, and know it will be good, then go for it. You can watch your initial ‘basket’ very closely!!
Don’t worry Kay, this topic went over my head a long time ago. I only went looking for the intrusions thing cos SIS mentioned it, and I have no idea how it all works as my friend built the computer for me and set it all up!![]
Guru, I was guessing that freedom wanted to put money in to build up the balance, and then when there was enough, to purchase either shares or property. Sort of like the ‘forced’ saving plan, but putting it into the trust where the investing is going to happen from.
Dom, it does sound good. It doesn’t meet the 11 sec (only just though) but if it is new, you’ve got depreciation to take into account, so can offset some of your other income, and result in a tax rebate.
Dave, contact one of the mortgage brokers and check out your borrowing power, and also work out your exact position.
Surely you would have more equity than 9K in the house that you are building? You could borrow against that to purchase more.
Although yack has a good point if you own the unit (or almost outright), as any income is then taxable, while your PPOR (principal place of residence) loan will not be.
The first thing I recommend you do is contact one of the mortgage brokers on this site and ask them to look at your whole situation.
You might be surprised, and find that you can actually borrow more in your current situation. At the very least, it will give you a better idea of what you need to do. I don’t know enough of your situation to offer advice, except that you need to factor in selling costs (CGT, agents, solicitors) as well as rebuying costs (stamp duty, solicitors, bank fees etc.).
A trust is just another entity. You can open a bank account and put any money in you like (keeping the records of course, whether it’s a gift or a loan from yourself). Any interest that account earns must be distributed to the beneficiaries, but any capital can sit in the account for as long as you like – or until you do something with it[]
1/ Pg 214. When you say that you interest margin in the deal with Mrs G was set by you to 2% …, did you mean that you would always be passing on the 2% addition to what ever was the current % rate
Answer: Yes. It will always be above the wrapper’s rate from their bank.
quote:
2/ Pg 215. In table 13.3 with the purchase price of $49500 and the cash needed of $10502 (with the clients deposit of $6500 taken into account), what did you do with the differnece from the bank loan amount of $39600 with the net cash needed of $10502 if the purchase price was $49500, to me it sounds like a surplus of (39600+10502)-49500=602. The reason I am reading this is that you said that that the investor MUST first own it, but then in your table it looks like you have account for the $6500 that you get as a deposit to enter into the wrap from the client against the startup of the deal…..sorry to confuse, but I am a little confused too!….
The $602 being the difference between the bank loan + deposit – purchase price presmably would have covered legals and stamp duty?
Steve then gets a deposit from the wrappee, and (I think) pays it off his loan. He then would say that invested in that deal, he has $4002 of his own cash.
I hope this helps, I am feeling a bit confused myself.