When I last claimed my weekly refund (it was still the 221D form then) I kept it in a separate account, and used that account to pay all property expenses. it worked out well then (I only had two properties).
I think I should submit it again, as it’s February now, and I still haven’t done last years tax return! I’m expecting a refund of $11K, so I really need to get on and do it[], and stop being so slack[V]
freedom finder, I would organise a LOC on my PPOR immediately.
I could then use this to cover the $275 per week. As you said, even with a low growth rate of 3%, you still come out in front at the end of the year. Meanwhile, teh most that your loan will increase is $15K (factoring in interest on the whole lot – which won’t happen as it’s not all drawn down from day one).
This then creates some ‘breathing space’, and enables you to spend time finding some good cashflow deals, or enables you to wait it out a bit until rents increase etc.
I would probably definitely look for some positive cashflow deals – possibly even commercial – to ‘ease’ the ‘burden’ though. But at the same time, I would pay some salary into the LOC (as much as I have spare). I would also look at getting the S15-15 return in to the ATO, so that my tax was reduced weekly – then this extra $$ would also go into that LOC to cover the shortfall.
If I saw $850K + I wouldn’t be interested in offering more than $850K.
Now if I saw the ‘buyer range’ of $850 – 920K’ I would think that they wanted $910K. If they’re not prepared to accept $850K I just don’t get why they put that in the range. I guess it’s like with auctions – the agents will try to talk the purchasers up (by quoting lower price range before auction) and the vendors down (on the day when there are no buyers at the previous figure that the agent had quoted).
If your trust merely purchased a company which ran a business it would not be operating a business in my view.
It would merely be the shareholder, and the directors will be running the company. The directors’ would/may have to sign guarantees, and would be the ones that the creditors come after if they have done the wrong thing. If all went belly up – the trust would lose the income, the assets of the company (as the company will be losing them), and it’s value in shares – which is normally about $2.
This is a much better way than for the trust to own all company assets, and actually do the trading. This is where you would be up for the properties being available to creditors if things went wrong.
Presumably you can get the plans etc. from the council which will include any approved buildings. If they’re not on the plan, they’re probably not approved.
If it’s going to be an IP, I would seriously investigate whether or not they would be approved. Insurance certainly won’t cover you if something happens to the tenant in the unapproved structure.
If it is for your PPOR, then it isn’t such a big issue, as long as it is structurally sound.
Houses Only, I don’t get why the rents would be going down if prices are going down.
Lower prices generally means less people buying. Less people buying means less investors buying new rental properties. Surely this will mean that the available supply will drop, and therefore the ‘greater’ relative demand will cause an increase in rents, thus causing increasing yields. Especially if you can afford to buy one of the properties that has dropped in value.
Originally posted by markpatric:
All you can do is be fairminded with tenants which means not buying so many houses that you are under pressure in order to become the next property tychoon.[V]
I would have thought that if you were a ‘property tycoon’ that you could afford to have lesser rents to help some people out if you felt that way inclined. Only owning one property will definitely limit how much latitude you have. We are, after all, buying the IPs to look after our own futures – not just out of the goodness of our hearts.
If you’re happy to sell at the price you listed, I would basically go with the offers in the order they were presented. Ie let the first guy’s wife have a look – but give him a deadline to decide. Let No. 2 know what is happening, and that they will have an answer on their offer by the day after that date. etc.
Anybody that I know who’s ‘retiring’ to other than where they live have generally been selling up in one place, to buy their retirement home. Although that is not to say that ‘everybody’ is doing that, just those that I know.
I think it’s the older generation who really believe in owning your own home, and tend to instil that belief in the younger ones coming through.
In Canberra the agents would like you to leave $1000 to ‘show that you are serious’. This is always refundable if you do not exchange contracts. It’s also not very common to exchange contracts with any ‘subject tos’. ie, all pest and building inspections etc. are carried out BEFORE anybody signs any contracts. That’s just the way it’s done – with the added risk of gazumping if the agent is into that.
As for deposit required on exchange, that’s always negotiable (as is the $1000 mentioned before), and my recent purchases (and sale) has been only on $1000 down.
Kim, I wouldn’t fix all my rates now, you will still pay a premium. For peace of mind perhaps fix some though.
If you’re going to keep that much of a buffer, I strongly suggest you have an offset account or a LOC to make that money work for you, but be readily available.
Risky, I hate to disillusion you, but you will find that trusts will never be ‘banned’. How do you think all our politicians keep all their vast amounts of money? A lot of them are solicitors by training, so would know all about asset protection.
If you are lending somebody a lot of money (or even a little – depends on your definition I guess), then it would pay to see what assets they have backing them up. You can do searches for $150 ish – up to about $1000 to work out just what they own/control etc. Once again, all part of you due diligence.
Don’t assume that because they live in a $3Mil house, and drive Ferraris that they ‘own’ anything and that the personal guarantee they signed means you’ll get your money back. Blood out of a stone still doesn’t happen.
Contact Simon to check out your borrowing capacity etc. And what deal you could get on a refinance. You never know, you might have access to more than you thought. It’s a great option to buy though – possible future development site. In the meantime, continue enjoying the place etc.
Cheers
Mel
Viewing 20 posts - 1,141 through 1,160 (of 2,396 total)