That does sound strange about no floor wastes. We have them in all our new apartments/townhouses. Although I note that they’re not in any of the older ones that we own – so obviously it may turn out not to be a huuuuuge issue. However, if the laws have changed, and they are now a requirement in new buildings, you would have a case. As the others have suggested, talk to the council.
I also find it interesting that you guys have not settled yet, but already the Body Corporate is creating all these rules. Surely they wait until the first owners’ meeting to set up the rules, and committe etc.?
or other colour backing approved by the Body Corporate
This might be your out though. Just check what colours they do agree to. They might just not like black, or any really dark colours or something like that. check it out before getting upset is my advice. You may find there’s a large range to choose from. And if you install blinds, it would be silly to then install a second backing or something.
Could I just give you my opinion on verticals though, and suggest that you reconsider. They don’t look real flash, and get tangled up, and don’t really block the light very well etc. etc. We went for venetians in all of ours. We also asked for, and recieved a 30% discount off the price, so it worked out quite reasonable.
congratulations on having started on your way towards financial freedom. I absolutely agree with saving as much as possible, and living with Mum and Dad as long as possible (I’ve come back home in the last 18 months, and I’m 29 in a matter of days[]).
The best thing that you can do is keep saving as you are. If you are looking at buying jointly with your friends, encourage them to set targets for what they also will save, and occasionally check up on each other, and encourage.
The best advice is to keep saving until you have enough for a 20% deposit and costs – and don’t rush out to buy any old property just cos you want to get started. Start doing research, and number crunching, and keep learning. Soon your practised eye will be able to spot a bargain a mile off. Then when you have enough cash to embark on the first one, start your crunching in earnest.
And don’t forget to keep asking questions on this (and other) forums. There are so many people who will answer you willingly with different experiences and ideas, and what’s more it’s free. You might also get some useful contacts to form your team (accountant, solicitor etc.)
Do not torture yourself with what you might have done differently. I seriously doubt that you could have done anything to stop him or change his mind.[]
A friend of a friend spent what turned out to be his last hours catching up with all his mates – saying good bye, but they didn’t realise it at the time.[]
It would have been better if you stated in your post that it was about a friend.
It is your friends choice to send the kids to the private schools.
If there is any equity in the PPOR (which there should be unless it was bought just recently) then there might be an option to purchase an IP. It would have to be a neutral one though, that contained lots of depreciation if tax saving is the issue – not that that is the best reason to invest.
I suggest your friend writes down his/her situation and talks to a mortgage broker to see what can be done. I believe there are also ways with trusts etc. that you may be able to turn after tax income (like school fees etc.) into pre tax income. So talking to a competent accountant is also necessary.
Failing that, cut back on the ‘discretionary’ expenses.
mqs5, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It actually then takes away the worry that the manager will only put people in his units, or his friends units etc.
If they are generally fairly stable tenants (which I’m assuming retirees are), then it would only matter whilst one of the ‘residents’ moved on, and another was found to replace them.
The main thing you would want to check is the occupancy rate though.
Your plan seems to rely on the capital gain that you think is ‘guaranteed’ in building the new home. I would have though that that would take up a lot of time too. Building, then living, then selling, then building etc. Do that too many times and you’ll be classed as a trader by the ATO anyway.
If you’re looking for cashflow, why don’t you look at building the place, but putting tenants in. If you can build cheap enough, this could be a CF+ place for you, plus you might get extra equity out of this deal that you could reborrow to do it again. That way you have several income streams at the same time.
Lamotte, an extended settlement can be a good thing! Except if it was going to be nicely cashflow positive of course – then you’ve lost out on that. If that’s the case, perhaps you should discuss your ‘losses’ with the vendor.
If it wasn’t going to be, or is going to be your PPOR, you may have had some increased value in the time, which could be good too.
Kreman, why don’t you chat to the owners, and tell them your situation. Perhaps they would be interested in wrapping to you as Terry suggested. I guess it all depends on why they wish to sell.
But that’s certainly where I’d start – especially as you know them.
Originally posted by markpatric:
I wouldn`t pay the high fees anyone is charging for a “kit”, that is laughable and rarely attend seminars, and no never a Henry Kaye one.
I do recall I said ‘gave us’ rather than ‘we bought’.
Trial and error is the best learning method.
Could not agree less!! I would much prefer to save years of time by learning from other people’s mistakes and successes. I don’t have the time or the money to want to throw it all away ‘learning’.
Of course some small % of people who buy these kits and attend seminars will benefit, (the early bird gets the worm) but within the next year or two I think you will see the vast majority don`t.[]
Why is it the early bird gets the worm? You are learning a ‘process’ that can be implemented time and time again – I see that Maccas stores all run EXACTLY the same way. Each new store is as successful as the first, so I don’t quite see your point.
If you need to ask a valuer the value of a property you should not even be investing in the first place Melbear.
Crap! I will get a valuer to confirm my buy price – especially before an auction as here in Canberra the banks do not take the sale price as valuation. And we also know that valuers are conservative, so our research which indicates a higher price may become a lower price in their eyes, depending of course on how they are instructed. I would like to know what my bank will lend me before I sign the contract. If their valuer is $20K less than my research indicates, I don’t want to have to fund that $20K myself.
Lastly Melbear have you invested in NZ?, what would you consider “due diligence”, with regard to buying there?.
This has got to do with……? No I haven’t bought in NZ. I do not have the energy to go over there to do the research – plus trying to learn to pronounce their place names would give me a headache []
Due diligence could entail anything, how can anyone give you guidelines for such a thing?, there must be times when you “take a chance” on certain aspects of a purchase, R/E does not work like this.
So when you go to buy a house, you do not have a number of things that you will automatically look for. You don’t care about population, employment, rental vacancy, comparable sales, rental comparables, etc. etc.? Of course you’ll have bloody guidelines. And of course somebody could set out a checklist for you. You do not have to do ALL the steps, but you know that you will cover what is really necessary.
Is that not why Steve developed the Buyer Beware templates? Are they not a set of guidelines that people can follow? Tenant checklist etc. etc.?
This is like saying use due diligence when driving, it is intangable, how can you predict what other people are going to do on the road?, I would go as far as to say people who use due diligence to the extreme on the roads are by far the most dangerous, good corrolation I reckon.[]
I agree that the data is historical, but it can also show a very good picture of the future. Martin Roth – the author of Top Stocks xxxx bases his predictions of Top Stocks on historical factors. ie gearing levels below a certain level, earnings per share and Return on Equity etc. If these change for the worse from one year to the next, then there are definite warning signs.
I think the same is true for house buying. We base everything on historical data, and we have some information of what will happen in the future. This is never necessarily a ‘dead cert’. When we look at population – we are looking at historical data. We are basing our future projections on what has happened. We don’t ‘know’ what will happen, we are just making an educated guess.
I have not bought any houses since November. I am currently looking at options other than shares and real estate – and it certainly isn’t cash in the bank.
Cheers
Mel
Viewing 20 posts - 1,101 through 1,120 (of 2,396 total)