‘Mel, before I summarise what exactly you are looking for let me first ask you whether your present partner is aware that you ‘are on the lookout’ ? (or at least considering your options) []’
I would hope so. I have ‘broken up’ with him about 3 times so far, and see him maybe once every three weeks, but he still does call me almost every day, and generally twice a day. He asked me what I wanted for Valentine’s day? I told him nothing and went to the movies with a friend (we were looking to avoid the heat – Canberra’s hottest day this year at 38.7 so we did well – 3 1/2 hours in air con – lovely). He hasn’t rung me since!!
O.K. here is a summary :
tall, dark, handsome, in possession of a job and money in the bank, agegroup minimum age 20, maximum age not specified, single (or at the least unmarried).
I don’t quite understand your words “If fit, then preferably under 45!”.
Max age 45, must be fit – all ages.
Does that mean that if he is 45 or over he can be unfit and yet qualify ?
Nope. I’m sick of guys almost 20 years older. I want somebody who is still prepared to ‘live a little’. Yes I know there are some good ones, but ‘been there, done that, didn’t like it’.
What do you mean by ‘dark’ ?
Suntanned ? Black hair? Chinese ? African ? Greek ?What ?
Not sure. That’s just the standard phrase isn’t it? Suntanned is good, but not leathery. Hair colour doesn’t matter (did I say he had to be reasonably intelligent? he does!).
I also note that you haven’t as yet addressed whether you want him to have a lot of hair on his chest.
Take it as it comes. If it’s a ‘lot’, I can always ‘encourage’ him to wax!! (My brother got his back waxed recently – ouch!)
Do you mind if he is a TV addict ?
NO, just so long as he doesn’t stay up ‘all night’. He should have ‘other’ things he’s interested in doing[]
A smoker or a non smoker ?
Preferably Non.
Do you mind someone who absolutely loves garlic ?
Doesn’t matter. If he wants to cook it, I’ll probably eat it too.[]
Are you looking for a good dancer or is it O.K. if he has two left feet ?
Doesn’t matter. Don’t go many places that require dancing. At my sister’s wedding the above mentioned fellow was drunk as a skunk before the wedding anyway, so there was definitely no dancing for me, except with the best man.
You haven’t even touched the subject whether you want him to be a good handyman.
Doesn’t matter. I still get Dad to fix all my stuff anyway[]
To answer your question as to whether I know any candidates, the answer is “Yes, I know oodles of guys”.
I am just trying to sort out the undesireables from the ‘must have’ types. I would say that I only have to spread the word and they will be queuing up. [:o)]
Prop 16, I’m thinking this fee would probably be quite a bit more than Mini’s fee for finding a property[?]
I recall Robert Kiyosaki saying that if he offers his course at $99 – which he could to cover costs, then he will get people with that mentality. So he’d rather charge a higher price, and get people who really want to learn.
Robert Allen put on a free seminar somewhere in the States. He was in the lift with a guy who didn’t know him, and who bitched about the supposedly free seminar. He had to pay for parking for an hour, and didn’t think it was worth his time. I guess these people wouldn’t want to spend $400 on a valuation, or pest inspection etc. etc.
Some people are not good at reading books. Some people need to learn by listening, and talking. It took me 8 years part time to do my Uni degree. Give me 5 18 hour days to learn the same stuff anytime!!
James, have you been to a Tony Robbins seminar? How do you know these people haven’t implemented. Do you know the thoughts running through their heads all day? That’s where a heck of a lot of the change comes from.
Oh, and yes, I have ‘flown around’ to Tony’s seminars, and got a great deal from it. It is an awesome atmosphere. []
I thought that I wasn’t – at least until towards the end of the year, but then I remembered my deal in Paddington. So yep, I’m buying in the next couple of months.
Originally posted by markpatric:
Are you saying the seminar was free Melbear?, I am talking about paying big dollars for information which is fast becoming obsolete anyway.
No, I said the kit was free. And why is the info obsolete? Because we are not in a fast moving market? Because we no longer buy real estate the same way? Because Kiwi’s who arrived here at some time have to become Aussies or they won’t get the dole?
Of course I have guidelines when I buy a house, things I look for, but to go into a purchase blindly believing there is no risk is unthinkable to me and extremely blinkered.
Where did I say that I go into a purchase blindly believing there is no risk. Of course there’s risk, but there’s also ways to MINIMISE (not eliminate) this risk.
There is always risk involved no matter how much due diligence you use and no matter how much cash you have spent on seminars and PI kits, besides who says you will even be capable of following the guidelines to the letter.
Why could you not follow then to the letter? Not being ‘capable’ sounds like a personal thing to me.
Of course you can learn much from others but to pay huge prices for information and blindly believe it contains a supreme secret to make everyone financially free is a little naive.
Whoever said it was a supreme secret? It’s just common sense, but presented in a way that you think, yep, I knew that, but I’ve never consciously sat down and put it all together. I bet what Steve teaches is not ‘secret’ but rather things that anybody could do if they sat down and thought about it, and did the same sorts of things. NOt everybody puts it into a seminar though.
What on earth has fast food got to do with PI?, do you offer your tenants free burgers if they pay rent on time?.[^]
About the same as driving your car I suppose – although I notice that the car analogy is one that Kiyosaki uses. Except my reference was to the SYSTEMS that Macca employs, and I ask you to point me to two stores that will cook their chips, or wrap their burgers differently – because you won’t be able to.
And Melbear, I think you are studying Ronalds technique a little to closely, wrapping and flipping properties just ain`t the same.[]
I’m guessing you mean wrapping as in burgers? And since when did I talk about flipping? Those that don’t know probably assume that’s all that Henry taught, but he actually taught that you should not buy a property with the sole intention to onsell it if you did not have the financial capacity to settle on it yourself if you could not find a buyer.
Why is the buyer’s deposit at risk? It isn’t here, as it is lodged in the Real Estate trust account. If the development goes past sunset clause, or doesn’t finish for whatever reason, the buyer’s can get their deposit back.
Four concurrent developments in Canberra is about 3 more than most other developers have on the go at any one time.
I feel either I have missed something in your response, or you missed something in mine, but I can’t quite put my finger on what that is. No matter….
Way to go Dom! Although on PP the yield is 12.4% but I’d take that most days of the week!
I’m not buying, but I’m seriously hanging on a contract exchange for Thursday on one I am selling. Should free up $60K for me to invest further and turn into $70K cash by July 05!!
Rooney, if mopsy’s suggestion is feasible for you it might pay to consider it. Then the CSA would ‘assess’ what you had to pay, which would be less, but you and your ex could come to the agreement that you had prior to CSA/Centrelink involvement and you’d both wind up winning! I’ve got a friend in the same situation. He said that for every $$ ‘saved’ or gotten back through neg gearing, 18c immediately goes to child support.
Kewl Dude, if the guy wants to know what his place is worth, either ask another couple of RE Agents, or shell out the $$ for an independent valuers report. Tell them it’s for selling purposes, and know that it will probably be a little conservative.
Also, put him in touch with a good solicitor who should be able to step him through what he needs to do. I’ve heard Lewis O’Brien mentioned for Melbourne, but don’t know of any others as I’m in Canberra.
If you are going to submit an offer, you must put what you are willing to pay – and be prepared to miss out. I think that’s how they get the emotion out of purchasers – at least with an auction you can see what others will pay. However, tender is better for a seller I guess in that the top price may be many thousand’s above second, whereas in an auction it only has to be $10 over.
So do all research as if an auction, and if you put an offer in, and it’s accepted, you have bought it. I don’t get the 20% depos stat if successful?
I’d say, no, 10% deposit – or you can offer less in your tender, just cos they say MUST BE doesn’t mean it’s not negotiable. Balance payable at settlement in my book. they’ve got a signed contract, so I don’t see why they would need more.
$3K a year is not too bad – provided you have the money, and have done research on the capital gain potential. To ‘maximise’ the tax you will get back you want to make sure that the building was built post 1985, and/or that there have been renovations done recently that will have good depreciation in them. This is the way to ‘lose’ money, but not to have to pay for it yourself.
Definitely keep hassling the agent. threaten them with legal action etc. I had to threaten mine with letters from my solicitor to them, the Fair Trading people, the REI etc. etc. Miraculously they coughed up.
there is also a website called http://notgoodenough.org/ . Check it out. You can put your grievance on there for all to see []. They will be contacted, and asked to respond etc. etc.
YoungInvestor, I have 8 IPs and never owned a PPOR. Penguin Jr I did have savings at 19, but didn’t use them to buy my first IP. My parents let me use their place as security (I don’t think any of us knew what we were getting into, we were well and truly two tier marketed – but it was a good learning experience).
I’ve moved back home now, and am definitely on a winner with my folks![^]
Of note, if you buy your first IP now, or in 6-24 months etc., and you never live in it, you are still eligible to recieve the FHOG when you do buy a house to live in [^]
I think your savings record is awesome, and not dissimilar to what I put in place when I first started work. However the most I had in the bank was $8K, and that ended up going towards a car[^] that lasted me for the next 8 years[^]. Ever since I throw about half my pay into my LOC, which is effectively my ‘savings’ but also reduces the loans to enable further purchases. I don’t draw on this money except for investments.
You will definitely get there, but take it slowly, and do lots of research to work out what you want to buy, and how to pay etc.
Yep, agree with the others. It will become PPOR as you move in. If you only stay in it for three months prior to selling, the CGT will be based on 24 out of 27 months. So, on 24/27th of the gain, which is still huge.
However, I think you could still move out for up to 6 years – if you have no other PPOR in that time – ad move back in and then sell it, and pay pro rata based on 6 years owning, 2 years rental, so down to 1/4.
Hallo Aussies, hope you’re geared up for the Olympics.
to answer your questions, I don’t know. But I thought I’d bring this post to the front again. Michael R if he’s around should be able to help with that one – he is a Kiwi (I think) who invests in the States and knows his stuff.
Perhaps you could also ask this question in the finance forum – a lot of the brokers hang out there[]
Mark, you say that both you and your wife are on the highest tax bracket but you mention you have been out of work for 4 months?
With the ‘No Income Protection’ I’m guessing that this is through injury, but that either way you are not getting paid? Therefore your tax bracket would be very low?
$5000 isn’t too bad (except when there is no income[V])
Definitely contact a mortgage broker. An option for you may be to set up a LOC against the extra equity (either in your PPOR or IP) and use it to slowly fund your ‘out of pocket’ expenses. If done the right way, the interest on these funds can also be tax deductible – check with a good accountant. This could enable you to redirect your earnings towards your PPOR, thus reducing the non deductible debt. This frees up more money for you etc. If your IP loan is not Interest Only – make it so while you have PPOR debt, and cashflow issues.
Then, instead of selling, look to see if you are able to fund the purchase of a CF+ property, which will further help you to pay off your PPOR, and offset your loss from the CF- property.
Selling costs, CGT, etc. etc. will take a big hunk of that $70K away from you, and it may not be worth it.
That’s my 2c. Ignore all if you wish, it’s my opinion only.[]
Good tips from Steve. You could also adopt the ‘wait and see’ approach, which should give you time to get some savings underway, which will of course reduce the amount you need to borrow. It will also give you more time to research etc.
Don’t feel that you need to jump in RIGHT NOW. Just get everything ready to go – ie LOC on your home, and keep searching. Eventually you’ll find one where everything stacks up, and you can jump on it then with confidence.
Cheers
Mel
Viewing 20 posts - 1,081 through 1,100 (of 2,396 total)