I think the bank still sees it as owner occupier. You might be in trouble though if you need their rental to actually qualify for the loan, but I have heard of people providing a signed agreement to the bank, and they have taken that into consideration for servicability.
I think (note ‘think’ please check yourself) that if you don’t claim the interest portion, you may not be up for CGT on that part. Definitely discuss the options with your accountant, and work out whether or not you will declare and claim, or just pocket the cash. Also best check the legality or otherwise of ‘pocketing the cash'[]
We all have choice in what we spend our money on. Some sacrifices may need to be made in order to get ahead. If you plan your shopping in advance, and don’t have takeaways, or ‘packaged’ meals, then you can cut your bills quite a bit.
For some tips on how to cut down your discretionary spending, without actually losing your ‘quality of life’, check out John Burley’s Money Secrets of the Rich.
It’s also a well known ‘fact’ that the more you get paid, the more you spend. There are people ‘struggling’ on $200K per annum.
A Dilbert comment that I have literally just recieved in my email
‘After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the month than you did before.’
The problem with keeping all your loans with one bank is that eventually you will hit their ‘lending limit’, and they will knock you back, no matter what the deal is like.
At this point, it’s necessary to go to another bank. If you have three loans with three banks, you now have three choices for your next loan that all know you already.
One other problem with all loans with one bank is that (I think most – a Mortgage Broker can clarify) when calculating servicability, they will add 2% or so to the interest rate for all their loans, whereas with other banks loans, they may take them at face value.
Why would you be paying a large amount of tax? At most it would be 48.5c in the $. To leave you with a profit of only $200, you would be making a profit of only $400 for the year anyway, which is hardly worth it.
You would be paying CGT on the place you sell unless it was your PPOR.
I think you need to realistically assess your $$ profit, not %, and then work out your marginal tax rate on that.
Companies are bad because there is no CGT halving. If it’s a trading company that is very bad because trading companies are more likely to be sued than a ‘shelf’ company that just owns property.
Trusts are better, with a company as trustee.
To get a loan though a company, they ask for the directors guarantees if there are no assets or income from the company (and possibly even if there are), so yes, I guess it’s almost as simple as just providing your own details.
tjal, there was a post made by Grizzly Bear (Steve’s business partner Dave) stating that as of 1 Jan 2004, the requirement is that you must live in your property for 6 months to retain eligibility for the FHOG – commencing within the first 12 months.
James, start date is the day you sign the contract. End date is the day you sign the contract to sell. Need to be careful if you give a long settlement, but exchange in one year and settle the next. CGT hits you in that first year’s tax return, which may need to be paid before you settle.
Yep, all my future loans will be with a broker. Was happy with my bank manager, but he moved interstate (was it something i said?). Ever since I can’t find a decent one, plus the bank shafted me, so they can bug off.
Matt, that is true – unless you are using all your available equity. But if I have an unencumbered property now, I would be pursuing that option – thus no unencumbered props for this little black duck.[]