My husband has been made redundant twice, so it is a case of “been there, done that”.
Advice?
Get a good accountant’s advice as to the structure of your payout from your company to make sure you take advantage of the tax benefits in a redundancy payout. Things like the wording and the way the money is paid can make a huge difference to the tax payable.
Investigate any Centrelink benefits you may be entitled to. Even if it is only the low income health card it will help.
Take care how you spend the redundancy money, it is there to support you till you find another job or start to receive income from a business. It may be better to keep making payments rather than pay out any debts.
I hope things work out well for you. Redundancy is a huge shock, although in my husband’s cases it was expected and the actual redundancy was almost a relief after living under its shadow.
In both cases my husband went on to bigger and better jobs, so in the end everything worked out for the best, as so often happens.
Forget the mayor and real estate agents and anyone else who has a vested interest.
Walk around and chat to the people you meet – people love to give advice and older people are often eager to chat. Find out if the number of kids at school are increasing or decreasing, look for empty shops, lots of “for sale” signs, check out the rental vacancies and anything else you can think of to give you the “feel” of the place. Ask at the produce store how things are going in the surrounding areas.
Chat to the people in shops, tell them you are thinking of moving to town and what is their opinion.
This should give you some more background information.
Marg
I find this site a bit on the slow side, and I am on broadband.
I have found that when I want to read a topic I right click and open it in a new window. When I have finished I simply close the window and the original list is still there. I have found this saves quite a bit of time rather than going forwards and backwards.
Marg
I recall reading about an ATO ruling for an individual that allowed deductions while holding a block of land. From my hazy memory it was a fairly exceptional set of circumstances that involved the intention to build a house, continual delays and then a complete change of circumstances which meant the house was never actually started despite all the approvals, loans etc being obtained.
I would be very wary of simply buying a block of land for investment and claiming all expenses.
Even though I think that you would not be able to claim the expenses as you go along, I would expect them to be taken into account when calculating any CGT liability.
But then again, I am not an accountant so if you plan to take that path I would suggest good professional advice.
Be aware of the increasing popularity of “fly-in fly-out” employment in mining towns where the worker’s family lives in a coastal city and the worker is flown in to work for a certain number of days then flown home for his/her days off. This reduces the demand for family homes.
Marg
It is contract date (purchase) to contract date (sale). Some advise waiting another day or two for the sale date just to be absolutely certain.
CGT is only one aspect, if you have a very good price offered you may decide to accept the certainty of the sale and pay the tax. After all, if you procrastinate the purchaser may decide not to buy. A later sale may result in lower CGT but you may be worse off overall if you cannot get the same price again.
Only you can make that decision.
A friend of ours purchased 7 days before the first home owners grant came in – he missed out on the grant but decided that the deal was too good to risk as so many purchasers were waiting for the magic date and he negotiated a price he was more than happy with.
Tax is only one aspect of the deal. And you will never go broke making a profit.
Despite owning IPs for 15 years or so I am an avid reader of RE and investment books, and can usually find something of interest or a new way of looking at things.
My main gripe with RE books is the way they gloss over maintenance issues. Hot water systems, range hoods, exhaust fans, stoves can have a life expectancy of around 10-15 years (less if tenants are careless) so if you own 100 properties then in any year you should expect to replace 8-10 hot water systems and 6-8 stoves, but I never see any reference to this sort of hefty expenditure. Even with Steve’s 130 CP properties which did not appear to be anywhere near new seemed to have incredibly little maintenance requirements.
If IPs are nearby then it is possible to do some maintenance yourself, but interstate or distant properties are at the mercy of tradesmen. Tenants are legally entitled to get repairs done when the problem arises.
But I still enjoy reading these books, even if the picture presented is usually a bit on the rosy side.
Cheers
marg
“If anything I wouldnt mind using some of the equity on my parents home. The house is paid off valued at $420k, so since its been paid off does that mean there isnt any equity available?”
My husband and I worked long and hard to pay off our PPOR (as well as having IPs) and I would be very disappointed if one of my adult kids felt that the assets I worked so hard to build up were simple theirs for the taking.
From the sound of it, you have no deposit. I encourage your aspirations to get into property owning, but am concerned that you hope to do it by cruising by on someone else’s efforts. And where will the money come from to pay ongoing costs? CP properties are hard to find these days, and even if you do they are often older houses that will need considerable ongoing maintenance.
Why not save like crazy and put together a deposit yourself? This will have the added benefit of convincing your parents and partner that you are serious and prepared to put in the hard yards. If you are still at uni then get part time jobs to kick-start your savings.
Maybe your parents are negative for the simple reason that without a secure income, you are taking on an enormous burden by borrowing, that is, if you can actually get a loan.
It’s NOT “now or never”, the prices people are paying now would have been unbelieveable to me 5-10 years ago. Prices cannot rise beyond what someone is prepared to pay.
Disasters do happen, and every now and there there is a sad story on TV of an elderly widow (usually a woman unfortunately) about to be evicted because she allowed her home to be used as collateral for a loan by a family member.
Get some solid savings behind you and you will find people far more supportive and your plans more realistic.
As someone very wise once said “you CAN have everything, but you CAN’T have it all at once”.
Keep researching and learning, your time will come. And concentrate on establishing your career, the income you earn will take you where you want to go.
Don’t even think about taking out Landlords Insurance in this case without disclosing that you have a non-paying tenant. That’s like ringing up to insure your house against fire after it has burnt down. You must disclose all material facts about a risk, whether it is specifically asked for or not. Otherwise you risk being accused of fraud – and when they investigate they won’t pay out the claim anyway. Of if you do find a company to take this on, please let us all know.
I am presuming you don’t have a property manager, otherwise they would be handling this problem.
You have two choices – see a property manager and get a quote for them to handle the matter for you, or consult a solicitor.
You can have the tenant legally evicted, but it will take time (we were once quoted 6 weeks by a PM) and money. Your tenant has a legal right to be on the property until you can get a court to order him/them to leave.
Forget the lease agreement (and the fact it has several months to run), your tenant has breached it by not paying the rent (should be a clause in the lease). Our leases state that they tenant is in breach if they are more than 7 days late with the rent. Don’t simply do nothing, each week of inaction is another week of tent lost.
Don’t be surprised if you have trouble getting a property manager to sort this one out for you – they may think that once the problem tenant is gone then you will again handle matters yourself.
PMs are like parachutes – you hope you never really need them, but when you do their assistance is vital – we have just dealt with the tenants from hell and our PM was worth every cent we have paid over the last 2 years on this particular property.
Good luck – but take action to remedy the situation ASAP, it won’t go away by itself.
Also, do get good advice, everyone here has rights including your non-paying tenant, and you must do this correctly to avoid repercussions on yourself.
Marg
Inner city suburbs show greater increases in median prices than outer suburbs, but I can find no evidence that the cost of renovations are taken into account.
In Brisbane prime suburbs like Auchenflower and Bulimba have had spectacular growth over the last 10-20 years. But the houses of today are vastly different to the houses of 10-20 years ago, most have been extensively raised, extended, modernised and had a lot of money invested into them.
Just drive around the suburbs with the higher increases and you will see the work being undertaken.
Then again, figures in outer suburbs or poorer or run-down areas can be skewed if a new estate goes in, suddenly there are $350K houses in an area that previously had $260K-$300K houses. The suburb shows a leap in values, but that does not mean that individual houses have increased by that amount.
And even if these factors do not play a part, it is also a simple fact that the houses sold in one year are not the same properties that are sold the next year, even though a comparison is made.
The only way to be absolutely sure would be to buy the block of land, build on it and live there, selling your present home if necessary.
There have been several well publicized court cases where views have been blocked despite covenants and even despite council “rules”, it all seems to end up in a very expensive and messy court case. And courts seem to be extremely reluctant to order demolition of houses that don’t comply with restrictions.
If you put a house on the block and sell it, there is nothing to stop the new owners adding a second storey on top. Or if you are able to prevent that, then there is also the possibility they may plant very tall bushy trees.
Sorry to sound negative, but it is very difficult to control the behaviour of others, particularly since good ocean views are worth a lot of money.
Marg
You will definitely get better capital gain from a house, but if you cannot afford a house then I think buying a unit is better than doing nothing.
Our first two IPs were units, we still have them. After 15 years they are worth about two and a half times what we paid for them.
It has been pointed out that that equals about 6% a year, not much better than bank interest. But we only put around $40K cash into them with deposits and costs, and they have paid themselves off and are worth a combined total of well above $440K. This means that our cash contribution has increased about 10 times, far better than any bank could do.
The advantages of units are that you are only responsible for the inside of the unit, exteriors and grounds are the responsibility of the body corporate. Check out the body corp fees and the sinking fund. Avoid lifts. Either buy in a small complex (4- or a larger complex of 40+ (to share the cost of a manager). Be wary of smaller complexes with managers as there are not enough units to share the manager costs.
One of our units is in a block of 8 (no manager, pool or other facilities) and the other is in a large complex of 80 with a manager, two pools, on about 2 acres of canal front land with boat ramp and jetty. The smaller block has lower rent and lower costs.
I don’t know the Sydney market at all so can’t help you with areas.
I am no expert – you will be best to consult a solicitor and an accountant.
But for what they are worth, here are a few things that I have thought of.
My understanding is that you bought the unit for $170K with your partner, renovated it and it is now worth $200K.
You own 50% and will have to buy your partner’s 50%, which is now worth $100K. This purchase will attract stamp duty and conveyancing costs, but these should be minimal as you have done all the searches when you first bought. Your solicitor can draw up the appropriate contract.
If the mortgage is in joint names then you will have to go to the lender to find out their requirements – i.e., can you “take over 100% of the mortgage” or do you have to pay out the “old” mortgage and take out a completely new one? There are finance experts on this forum who will know far more about this than I do. But I suggest you talk to your lender as a first step to find out where you stand with them, and what charges (if any) will be involved. If a completely new mortgage is required, you may want to consider a different lender.
As far as capital gains go, you will add up what you have spent: to obtain your “purchase price”:
$85K half purchase price
half of stamp duty/conveyancing costs
half of renovation costs
$100K for the 50% you are purchasing
all stamp duty and associated costs
any further renovation/capital costs that you may undertake.
Make sure you keep good records so that your outlays are clearly substantiated.
Your partner will be responsible for the capital gains on his 50% if there are any after allowing for costs.
As I said, consult the experts – there may be other issues that I am not aware of.
If you watched that program to the end you would have learned that the Rental Tribunal ordered that the tenants be released from their lease.
You are legally obliged to remedy any situations concerning safety, e.g., dodgy electricals. Apart from that, I work on the basis of maintaining the property in the condition it was in when the tenants entered into the lease.
Other requests we treat on their merits, always listening to our managers. In general, if the repair is one that we would have to do before the next tenant moves in, then it is reasonable to do it.
From the way you say “the property is in NZ” I presume you don’t live nearby. Checking with the property manager would be my first action. We have set a low limit with our managers on the amount they can spend without referral to us ($100).
We have found that close supervision of property managers is essential – get on first name basis, send Christmas cards, call in for a brief chat – in other words, become a “face” rather than a “name”.
Occasionally get independent quotes yourself to ensure that best prices are being obtained by property managers – unfortunately there is sometimes the knowledge that “it’s tax deductible for the landlord” translates to higher prices.
Marg
Is this person a friend of yours? it sounds to me as if he/she is trying to remove assets that may be subject to a property settlement if his/her relationship has broken down.
There is absolutely no reason for a person to sell a $240K asset for $150K unless fraud of some sort is involved, which is something that it is probably not very wise to become caught up in.
Deliberate asset stripping can be reversed by a court ruling. Even though you buy the property, if a court deems that it was deliberately sold cheaply to avoid paying a partner his/her legal share, then the transaction can be reversed. By buying so far below valuation it would be hard for you to claim you did not know that something odd was going on.
Also be aware of stamp duty implications.
But I am no expert, just that I’ve learned that if it sounds too good to be true then there is usually a catch.
Take good legal advice to protect yourself.
And remember there is such a thing as karma… if you act with this person to do harm to another, then karma has a way of catching up with you.
Marg
PS: Then again, i may be way off track. Maybe this is just a nice person who wants to make a gift to you…in which case I apologise for getting it wrong.
Our first two IPs are units, purchased 1990 and 1991. Units generally have slightly less capital gains than a house, but as you have found you require less money to get into the market. Each is now worth a bit over two and a half times what we paid for them.
In many ways they are an ideal first IP. The body corporate is responsible for all the external area, so basically you are only responsible for the insides of your exterior walls.
If you want to invest in property then I would suggest contacting a lender or mortgage broker. They will run through all your assets, income etc and will be able to tell you how much you can borrow and what the costs are.
Then do your own sums and figure out what you can afford. The amount you can borrow will probably amaze you so don’t get carried away.
If you already own your own home then you have been through the purchasing process.