Forum Replies Created
- Qlds007 wrote:Definately agree Aaron.
If the level of enquiry from clients saying "my current lender has just declined my loan, can you help" is anything to go by it is only going to get worse and worse.
Hi Richard- Interesting comment. Are you seeing the domestic credit market tightening possibly due to the Greece default? And it sounds like you think this trend will continue and credit will get harder to get?
Cheers,
Lukescha9799 wrote:Hi Kosta,
welcome to the forum : )
1.2 Million at age 30 is way ahead of many people already, congrat !
there is a option you can invest to have healthy cashflow position constantly.
you can put 1.2 million in the bank at interest rate 6%, you can have healthy can safety cashflow about 72,000 per year. which mean one of you don't have to work full time already.
Putting money in the bank and living off interest is not a strategy that anyone I know would suggest. Inflation will erode the buying power of your interest and you will have to go back to the workforce pretty shortly.
Investing in assets that grow in value at a rate higher than inflation is the only way to either grow or conserve your wealth. If you put the money in the bank and withdraw the interest each year then you will not achieve this goal.
cheers,
LukeBest talk to your solicitor/settlement agent- but of course make sure they know what they are talking about!!! I understand that you would be up for double stamp duty if you had not set up the company/trust when you signed contracts. Best to get this sorted out BEFORE you sign anything to avoid painful and expensive mistakes.
Cheers,
LukeTerryw wrote:My view is that none of the interest will be deductible if you put the money into an offset account. Once it hits the offset it is no longer borrowings. See the Domjan case – although Domjan was denied deductibility because the borrowed funds were mixed with non borrowed funds in the offset.Use a LOC as it is not worth the risk. Or use a term loan with redraw and have the funds sitting in redraw ready to invest. Make sure this is a separate split though.
As for the interest on the buyer's agent fee. This will relate to a property which you have not yet purchased. So I am not sure how it would be treated. Would be interested to know what the accounants think.
I agree with Terry- a LOC doesnt cost any extra (well a bit extra but the difference is nigligable) and is easier to use than a loan split for this purpose so why try to complicate things.
Cheers,
LukeNot meaning to be rude or to judge against forum users- I love this forum and am on it all the time but sometimes you have to get paid advice.
Cheers,
LukeThis is complicated- I would get actual advice from a suitably qualified and experienced accountant rather than from a forum. Relying on something that someone told you in a forum is not the best idea.
Cheers,
LukeWhy not get a LOC? I dont know if you can just get a normal residentail loan and get the bank t give you the cash. also, when you get the cash, you would need to put this in a seperate account away from your savings otherwise the borrowings may become contaminated and you might lose tax deductablity.
You will pay an extra 0.1% for a LOC but this is only $7.91 per month on a $95k loan, which would surely be cheaper than paying the interest on the $95k loan for 3 or 4 months prior to you buying the property.
Cheers,
LukeI AALI- I don't understand how you can contribute 4-7k per month on two $65k incomes. Is the $65k after tax?
Cheers,
LukeAnother shrimp on the barbie? Does anyone do that anymore?
I had prawns a few nights ago, but they were with a white wine and cream sauce………
Hope you enjoy those ribs!!
Ahhhh yep, sorry Jay I didn't realise that you had posted that earlier reply, I thought it was from someone else.
Is everyone just jealous because Labradorinlove owned 8 properties before she was 23?
Sounds like you are doing really well to me! This Jay Hinrichs might be the person to talk to, there are not many people on this forum who know the ns and outs of USA property (apart from the peolpe trying to sell their services of course!). There was also a guy on here who went by the name of speedygonzales (I think!!) who sounds like he is doing well for himself investing in Texas, maybe you could give him a PM and he might be able to help.
cgheers,
LukeHi RB,
If you were simply borrowing the funds to renovate your PPOR then you certainly can do this. However the interest on the loans would not be tax deductable as the purpose of the loan was not for investment purposes.
If you have purchased the investment property in your own name you may be stuck, but if it is purchased in a trust I am sure there is a way around it. Having said that, there are some pretty good accountants out there who can make almost anything legal so there may be hope for your tax deductability yet.
Cheers,
LukeIf you would not buy it at $510k, then don't buy it for $510k. If the property is only worth $490k and that is what your offer is, then they will not find a buyer at $510k and so after a few months they will need to lower the price to the market value, which sounds like $490k. When they do this you will be able to buy it!!
But getting the seller to realise that their house is worth $490k when they think it is worth $510k is pretty hard. I was in the market at the beinning of last year and a house I was interested in was on the market for $530k. I believed that the house was worth $460-470k and so offered $455k. They told me where to go and that there was no way they would accept only $455k because their house was worth $530k at least. Fast forward 14 months and the house is still on the market with the price reduced to $510k and with the third real estate agent trying to sel it, and I can't see anyone paying that much for the house.
So you could wait and see, and after a month or so resubmit your offer and hopefully the owners will realise that their patch of dirt is no different top anyone elses patch of dirt and they can't sell at a premium. Or you could try some negotiation, like offereing a short or long settlement. If it a deceased estate then I doubt the family will want to sit on the property for too long so hopefully within a month or two you will have a chance of buying it at your price.
Cheers,
LukeIf you are converting to two dwellings, you will need council approval as there are issues like fire seperation and BCA compliance that you need to meet, So you will probably need to get a DA to do this project- the easiest way to find out how to do it is to visit the town planner at the local council.
To split the electricity bill, you could just have it in your name and have the tenants agree to each pay 50% of the bill when it arrives. But there are risks with this, such as one tenant not paying the bill because they think it is too much and that the other tenants are using most of the electricity. similar problem with water usage bills, but it just depends on whetehr you want to spend the money on getting seperate metering installed.
Cheers,
LukeHi Raj,
If you want to convert the house to units then you will have to get approval from council, which will probably mean getting a DA and then after work has finished obtaining a occupation certificate which allows people to live in the units.
You don't necessarily need seperate electricity meters, but it would not be possible to have the tenants pay for their electricity without them. To get seperate meters installed in an existing house would probably mean you will need to rewire the house.
Similar thing is for seperate water meters- if you want seperate water meters you might need to replumb the house, although you would need to do quite a bit of plumbing work anyway if you were converting a house to several units (e.g. you would need new kitchens, bathrooms etc).
One thing to note is that Sydney Water does not allow more than one water meter on a property, so unless you are creating seperate titles, then you would need to install meters that you can read yourself to allow you to split the water usage between tenants (I am asssuming you are in Sydney based on your user ID).
Cheers,
Luke"icing on the cake" rather
PISTORE wrote:luke86 wrote:PISTORE wrote:Catalyst wrote:PISTORE wrote:The idea with any property investment strategy is to aim for a neutrally geared portfolio.Really??? What's the point in that? OK if you're working a job I guess but it certainly wouldn't be anyones aim.
My investment strategy is to be POSITIVELY geared. I want to be making money. The more positive my portfolio is the more money in my pocket.
It's all about balance. Positively geared portfolios are great until you start getting taxed for the privilege.
The way I see it is that if you become positive geared then go and buy another investment property to offset your positive gearedness (if that's even a word) this way your problem keeps compounding, which is a great problem to have. If you keep aiming at a neutral portfolio then Julia can't get her bit and you maximize your opportunity for growth.Why would you buy a property to save tax?
Cheers,
LukeLuke, it's not about saving tax as much as delaying and minimizing when you have to pay it.
I would much rather invest the money in something I think is a priority than have the Government make that "excellent choice for me.I just think buying a proeprty to save tax is crazy- takes breaks are just the ciing on the cake for me.
Cheers,
LukePISTORE wrote:Catalyst wrote:PISTORE wrote:The idea with any property investment strategy is to aim for a neutrally geared portfolio.Really??? What's the point in that? OK if you're working a job I guess but it certainly wouldn't be anyones aim.
My investment strategy is to be POSITIVELY geared. I want to be making money. The more positive my portfolio is the more money in my pocket.
It's all about balance. Positively geared portfolios are great until you start getting taxed for the privilege.
The way I see it is that if you become positive geared then go and buy another investment property to offset your positive gearedness (if that's even a word) this way your problem keeps compounding, which is a great problem to have. If you keep aiming at a neutral portfolio then Julia can't get her bit and you maximize your opportunity for growth.Why would you buy a property to save tax?
Cheers,
LukeHi Freckle, just wondering if you live in Perth? The only thing bonkers is the mining economy there. With billion dollar projects being announced every second week, it would be a brave man to bet that it is going to end soon. My observation is that when BHP plan on spending $40 billion in the next ten years in iron ore expansion projects and go ahead and build a huge new skyscraper in the Perth CBD to house their workers, they dont think the boom is ending any time soon. And then you can add the mountains of Rio Tinto and FMG projects in the pipeline.
I have more faith in the financial forcecasts of the BHP and Rio Tinto executive team than those of the average person off the street, so my opinion is that the good times are here for a while yet.
Cheers,
LukeSaying that the aim of having a negatively geared portfolio is ridculous in my opinion, the same as saying the goal is to have a positively geared portfolio.
I think the aim would be to have a property portfolio that acts to meet your individual goals.
Some people would be happy with a negatively geared portfolio with plenty of upside for growth in the short to medium term, while others would be happy with a positively geared portfolio that nets $2k per month. It depends on who you are and what your goals are.
Personally, I would prefer a nuetrally geared $10m residential portfolio with properties located in potentially high growth urban areas, that a $1.5m portfolio of properties in marginal rural areas that brings in a thousand dollars a month. But others might prefer it the other way around.
Cheers,
Luke