Forum Replies Created
If anyone seriously thinks that it would be a good thing if the bottom fell out of the housing market then you need to get your head checked. It happened in the USA and look what the result was- massive job losses and unemployment in excess of 10%. If you think that that scenario is better than what Australia is got at the moment then I am sorry but I just don't understand.
Maybe you just want house prices to crash so you can have a laugh at other peoples pain. I am 25 and graduated from university 2 years ago and am about to sign contracts for my second IP (in Sydney). I agree house prices are expensive in Australia at the moment, but there are things I am doing to minimise that exposure (like investing in CF+ve USA real estate). And I also think that if you want to own property then it is definitely possible, however sacfrifices are needed.
I personally dont think prices will crash. Unemployment is near all time lows, Australia's economy is the strongest it has ever been with tens of billions of resources projects in the pipeline which will have direct flow on effects to other parts of the economy and experiencing wage and inflationary pressures. I dont think housing will rise at in excess of 8% per year like it has in the past, but I can see quality real estate in quality locations will rising by a historically moderate 5% per year. In the absence of a trigger, a crash just isnt going to happen IMO.
Cheers,
LukeYep, I agree with xdrew- if the property isn't renting then it is probably over priced. Have a look at realestate.com.au to check out what other 4 bedroom homes in the area are renting for to make sure your asking rent is right.
And also try ringing an agent and giving them the address, what the asking rent is, a description of the property and see what they think. a different agent might have a prospective tenant on their books so you might be able to sign up with them straight away.
Cheers,
LukeHi,
I have a few comments to make about your ideas
a. This sounds good and should be easy. Do some research on your target market- if the units around your area typically sell to investors, then this might even be a win for them as it will likely be negatively geared. So they get to secure the property at the price that suits, but delay the cash loss on the property. If however owner occupiers are likely to buy your house, then this might not be very attractive. Remember it is a buyers market in most parts of Australia at the moment.
b. This is probably not ideal for the buyer. If they are an investor, they would probably want to get a tenant on a lease into the property for security. And if they are owner occupiers, then they would obviously like to live there. But then again, if the rent you are offering is attractive then they would probably be pretty happy.
c. You shouldnt have to pay extra. It is a buyers market at the moment so you should be able to negotiate a longer settlememnt as they are probably taking a while to sell their property (unless of course you get a ripper deal- then you might have to just buy the place on a short settlement to secure it).
d. An LOC secured against your current PPOR could work. You might also be able to capitalise the interest as you could argue you need to do thi sin order to hole the property untill you sell (to show it is not a tax avoidance strategy). However this is costly and depends on your servicability as to whether you could do it.
e. Depends if you dont mind moving, but this could be a sensible option. Bear in mind that this would probably result in having longer vacancys at your IP.
f. This is pretty similar to e. really
g. You might have difficulty getting a vendor to accept this clause as it is unlikely you would be able to arrange settlement dates so close to each other (you would need to be lucky with selling!!!!)
h. I cant think of anything else!!!
Hope this helps, I was just jotting down a few thoughts that came into my head.
Cheers,
LukeStingrayBirke wrote:Members of Somersoft seem rather nervous: Somersoft members worried?
Really?? Did you read the posts there?? No one seemed worried to me!!
And I forgot to add- I don't think that these campaigns will not effect the property market at all.
Luke.
I dont think there is any possibility that the government will legislate to remove negative gearing. It has been done once before and it was a disaster.
In my opinion the people at Get Up do not know what they are talking about.
Cheers,
LukeWhy not consider putting down a 10% deposit? You have the deposit as your gift, and can you still get a $7k FHOG or has that expired?
Cheers,
LukeLearnings wrote:Add in GF's 35kpa as guarentor to loan – not ideal
One thing you need to remember is that banks are not allowed to have a serviceability guarantor anymore (since the new NCCP rules I think). So to use her income for serviceability you will have to have the loan and the new property in joint names.
Cheers,
LukeHi Rick- Just wondering who you were going through to get finance for your USA properties? I would expect to pay approx 5-8% interest so am struggling to see how you wouldn't be better off financing 3 properties with a 15-20% net return compared to paying cash for one?
Interested to see how you went about getting finance, who through, and what hurdles you hit.
Cheers,
Luke.Hi TH. Managing US property from a distance is the big concern for me as well. I am in the process of completing a small development in Sydney and once that is finished I hope to jet off to the USA and start my foray into property over there.
I plan to talk to as many people as I can who are investing the the areas I want to get into. This will hopefully mean I will have a list of contacts (property managers, legal representatives, accountants etc) who have come recommended that I can meet over there. Setting up this team is crucial from my point of view as I will be relying on them to keep the operation running from day to day while I communicate from a distance. I am confident I can handle the acquisition side of things, as buying property is something that I feel comfortable. However, I am going to make sure I put enough time and effort into building and managing my team to ensure my assets are safe and well managed profitably and sustainably.
Look forward t hearing other preoples comments and thoughts!!
Luke
And I forgot to add- if your tenant falls down your non BCA compliant stairs and injures themselves and sues you, your insurance would probably not cover the liability so you would may up for a few million dollars in compensation. I would definitely go with a compliant stair however I can not for the life of me justify a builder charging double just to add a landing.
Luke
Trev wrote:There can be no more than 18 risers in a flight of stairs (i.e. in a set of risers not interrupted by a landing or floor). Does your existing staircase have more than 18 risers in an uninterrupted flight?
I don't think you have any choice but to comply with current BCA requirements in building a new set of stairs. The builders would also have a legal responsibility to comply. You would need to seek Development Approval from your local Council.I am not sure if there would be a need for DA but you could check with council to make sure. As long as the new stairs are BCA compliant and do not alter the appearance of the house from the street then I think you would be safe.
There are a number of requirements for BCA compliance- the number of steps between landings, the size of the riser, the size of the tread, the width of the stairs, height of handrails, the list goes on. It is actually not that complex- if you have a read of the BCA it is pretty self explanatory and easy to comply with.
Cheers,
LukeGet a copy of the BCA and research yourself. Or ask the people who are quoting for a BCA compliant stair what makes it compliant. I think I can shoot you a copy of the BCA if you pm me.
I would say pay Interest only on yor investment property forever. After the 5 yrs interest only period has expired, get another 5 yrs (or 10 yrs is better) interest only period established. If you bank wont extend the interest only period, switch to a lender who will.
Cheers,
LukeGood point Richard, I didn't pick up that the loan was CBA.
You won't lose the tax deductions, they will just be deferred to be offset against future income when the property eventually becomes cash flow positive. So I believe you will still be better off using borrowed funds to pay for 100% of property costs plus all of the buying costs. If I were you, I would leave all of the cash in an offset account attached to your home loan as the interest on this debt is not tax deductable.
Agree Euro, good post.
I agree with Dan. It sounds like it is a property located in a great growth area. Property in this part of Sydney is very hard to come by- no one is making any more land here so I can only see prices continuing to rise. If were you I would keep the property as it is an asset that is performing very well.
Nice link Dan. It actually says refrigerator in the list of items that need to be depreciated over a number of years!!
luke86 wrote:No problems about not having a record of the original cost- if you know the approximate ago, size etc you (or your accountant) can make a reasonable approximation of the value and base the deductions on that.Cheers,
LukeSorry about the typo- I meant if you know the approximate age, not approximate ago.
Serves me right for not proof reading before hitting "post"!!