I think it is Perth taken from an unusual angle, probably from South Perth or Heirisson Island. You can see the Narrows Bridge, deadcentre is the Quandrant, Central, AMP and BankWest’s stanley knife building.
Paradise!
[]
Hi people! I have just been looking at the 3.5 book cover (The original one…) and I am trying to decide which city skyline it is. I personally think it beautiful Perth as it has ol’ Bondi’s tower (Or now know as the bankwest tower…) with its slanted head and Central PArk tower next to it with its symmetrical point. AMP tower is the shorter one in between, but then again, I haven’t seen a picture of the Melbourne skyline. MAybe it is very similar to PErth’s…
What do all of you lot think? Perth or Melbourne?
Cheers
Steph.
P.S Perth is the better of the two naturally…
[}][][8D]
Success is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.
[/quote]
Thanks Peter,
I think the crash scenario is more complex.How long will it last and how far will it fall are hard to determine. If the home value falls, then bank anxiety increases, , like banks calling in their shares options.What happens to rent in a falling house market? As the philosophy requires buying poor property in poor streets, selling becomes more difficult.
I am initiating this rather cautious debate, as I left the UK 6 months before their property slump hit in the late 80s. Prices halved, and mortgages were hence greater than the actual value, hence selling wasn’t even an option.
Shares in that financial climate are more liquid.
Hi Long: I can’t speak for Steve, but my answer to your questions would be:
1. Buying in rapidly rising market
Getting a 10.4% yield on good quality property is tough when the market is hot. In most areas to do it you’d have to do something special, eg make it a boarding house. If you refuse to buy under a particular (fairly high) yield level (Steve says 10.4%, Neil Jenman says 7%) that should protect you from paying too much. It’s analogous to only buying shares with low P/E ratios (ie value stocks).
2. Dealing with a market crash.
If you’re buying purely for income and deemed 7, 10 or whatever % yield as acceptable when you bought it, a crash might not be too much of a concern. Assuming you’ve got something in reserve, the main problem is that you’ve got less to borrow against when planning future acquisitions. If you’re still worried, why not set a max LVR across your portfolio of (say) 50% rather than 80%, so there’s a bit of leeway? You don’t need to have all that as equity in the properties; it could be in shares, etc instead.
PS. Their ‘Value Watch Info’ isn’t available until post Oct 2003.
Valuer General (fax 0894298460) in WA will fax back last purchase date/price on a particular property and sales values of 70 others for $14 or 110 properties by e.mail for $22. The “other” properties can be split over two areas ie 35 around two different properties. My search yesterday was answered within 1/2 hour.
[/quote]