Forum Replies Created
As a past vocal critic (unusual for me to be like that I know!!) of the speed of the site, I am happy to see that it has improved out of 'site' (pardon the pun).
Well done techs!!
I would like to see recent posts appear on the login screen as before though. Small criticism. Generally I like it.
Lisa, click on the "forums" button at the top of the page and the list will drop down, then select the category you want to look at. If you are like me and have no life you will look at all of them to find someone to annoy!!
It's not always about being "the provider". Maybe they are being chivalrous; you know; that politically incorrect practise of being nice to the fairer sex , and for that matter; anyone else on the planet.
Maybe they are disgustingly rich and like to pay. My best friend is rolling in cash and loves to be the first person to put his hand in his pocket; because he can.
Let 'em pay; saves you a business expense (and some cashflow) that you have to pay out of petty cash, which you have to claim back at the end of the year.
Be careful of their alterior motive though… I would tell you what it is, but it may be a sexist (but true) observation.
The usual immediate effect of an interest rate rise is the normal "mums and dads who must spend every cent on doodads" consumers pull their financially illiterate heads in for 5 mins.
Sorry; had to get that off my chest!
The idea is that the rate rise will slow down consumer spending, which puts a dampener on the "demand" side of the "supply and demand" equation, thus keeping inflation in check.
Steve may be right; the Fed may be worried that house prices are about to take off again, so a few small rises close together usually nips that in the bud pretty fast.
Personally, I can't see a lot of increases in house prices in the near future; especially in the middle price range. It seems that the well off aren't affected much by house price rises or interest rate rises, and the the first home owners and investors will always be looking for purchases at the lower end. I think the extremes of the market will continue to keep moving while the middle groung stalls for a while. i.e houses well under the mean or average, and well over the mean or average will see some action.
The Fed is probably targetting consumer spending more than housing booms with these rate rises in my opinion.
The good news for investors is the impact of every rate rise is decreased due to our tax deductions on the interest on our loans.
One thing will be for sure though; if there are more rate rises in the next few months there will be no property market boom. Why? because the affordability of housing is very bad right now, and further rate rises will make it worse.
Renting a place yourself while you rent out your other properties for most people is the finacially smart thing to do. All the interest and holding costs on your I.P's are tax deductible, and if you are a fairly high income earner it is even better. Many can't stand the idea of someone living in their PPoR though, but if it doesn't worry you then go ahead.
The problem with studios is quite often the size. Most lenders won't, or a reluctant, to lend on anything smaller than 50 sq/m.
You would want to check the size of the apartment, and also the body corp costs. They can be rather high in bigger buildings.Another possible problem is that traditionally the land content of a property is what appreciates while the building depreciates. Given this scenario, the likelihood of cap growth on studios should not be as good as say a townhouse.
But the demographic factor comes into play these days, with young, professional people seeking this sort of accommodation. Therefore you may get good cap growth anyway.
You may be able to rent a nice studio for yourself in Sydney, and buy one as an I.P, with the view to moving in there down the track, and it may cost you no more money out of your pocket to do so. This, if you can arrange it ,would be a good move in my opinion. But don't do it if the bottom line wil put you under financial pressure.
If you do some heavy due diligence on the history of studios in the area; who is buying them, are they in demand, is there a glut of them in the pipeline for construction which may devalue yours, is there a demand for rent for this type of property, etc. you will have a more informed view of the investment.
Don't ask this question too loud; the agents might think this is a new way they can gouge some dough out of us.
No F; I don't think you are.
As usual, you are the number cruncher who reveals the real truth.
I remember reading a book by John Burley ("Money Secrets of the Rich" – every high school student should have to read it I.M.H.O), where he was talking about Banks.
He said that if a Bank comes up with a product, and also advertises it heavily, then you can be sure that they are making money out of it, and probably lots of it.
Of course; they will always present it in such a way to make it look like they are doing you a favour, but we all know better… don't we?Totally agree S that tax is not the sole reason to invest – to me it is the icing on the cake.
The tax deductions for I.P's are a bonus at any marginal tax rate. Of course; the higher your tax rate the better it is.
The arguments for and against what you are asking are numerous.
A main reason for owning an I.P as your first property is the tax write-offs from the holding costs of that property, but you still have to pay rent where you live as well, so there is a bit of a trade-off. Because you are self employed and probably don't get tax refunds, then this may not be as good a strategy as it would be for a wage earner.
Unless you own your onw home outright, renting is usually cheaper, and you can usually rent a much nicer house for the same money as your mortgage would cost. But would you do that? It seems to me that you are the type of person who would rent somewhere less expensive and commit more dollars to the investing track?
You sound as though you have the right mindset for owning and investing; you can see the benefit of adding value, and working towards owning investment property. It may be better for you to get the PPoR, and follow the plan of reducing the loan as fast as possible (as everyone should do I.M.H.O), then you can get into investing sooner.
You should talk to an accountant about the benefits/liabilities of owning an I.P while you are paying rent elsewhere, given that you are self employed.
It will be interesting to see the 'fallout' from this product in about 3 years.
As you are probably aware Wayne, the market here in the US has just begun to see the ramifications of weird and wonderful and 'creative' finance products taken on by borderline qualifiyers a few years ago.
My worry is it will happen back home in Aus. Glad to be wrong.
My gripe with all these 'exotic' finance products is they are designed to make it possible for those who normally can't afford to get into the property market. With affordability at an all-time low, the finance companies and the banks are looking to invent new ways to get people into the housing market, and the M.B's are gunna push them as they get paid when they sign up a punter.
I.M.H.O, it is a similar situation to the F.H.O.G, where the first home owners weren't any better off as they all had an extra $7k (some had $14k) to play with, thus they could bid higher for their house, and did. The prices went up and absorbed any benefit pretty quickly. The same will happen in time as a result of products like these Shared Equity Loans.
The underlying cause – affordability (or lack of) will still be bad as the newly qualified buyers compete for the remnants of the cheaper housing to be had, thus forcing the prices up a little more and keeping the affordability low for a bit longer until another new miracle finance deal is invented.
It's all great for me; the cheaper properties go up, which forces the values of mine up, but the poor first timer will still struggle.
I've been living in L.A for the last 19 months, and I haven't seen a r/e agency yet that offers property management. They seem to be two totally different animals here; sales and management, and the management companies I have seen seem to be only interested in apartment buildings – not single family dwellings.
I know a fairly successful investor here (worth a few mill) and he never buys outside 30 mins from home and manages his properties himself. He is constantly pulling his hair out and staving off a heart attack due to the stress of managing everthing. No thanks; I love my PM's back home; emailed statements and rent in the bank.
On a side issue, and again from what I've seen, I wouldn't be buying over here without coming out to have a look around first. The system here is different from ours in Aus, there seems to be more involved, there is property tax and management is hard to find at the "entry level" (single family dwellings).
My advice as an outside observer who hasn't bought anything here; invest at home. The grass is never greener.
There are plenty of opportunities in Aus, and less headaches.
emmajames wrote:Who (what are these people called and where can i find them) should i pay to do an inspection of a property i am wanting to invest in if i can't do it myself?
You can do the inspection yourself, but be prepared to get dirty and do some crawling around in roof spaces and under floorboards. Depending where the property is that you wish to buy, you can hire the services of a local reputable builder, or in bigger towns and/or cities you might try Archicentre. Try googling builders in the town concerned, or look in the local phone book as well.
Don't use a builder recommended by the agent selling the property – go to another agent for a recommendation if you must as the selling agent has a vested interest and this can be dangerous for you.
The cost can be a few hundred dollars, so unless the property is being auctioned then I would include the inspection as a condition clause of the purchase offer. If the property is being auctioned, try putting in an offer before, with the building and any other conditions in the offer.
Be careful with the wording as well. Simply putting "subject to satisfactory building inspection" is extremely limiting and can by interpretation cover only the frame of the building. You want to be very specific about what you want to satisfy you, eg; "subject to building, walls, guttering, widows, etc being in fair and reasonable condition given the age of the building".
If the report comes back that there is damage, then you can decide whether you want to proceed, or offer less based on said damage, or ignore the report and proceed anyway.
Make sure the date for the completion of the inspection is from when the Vendor signs the contract, and ask for at least 7 days to complete it just in case the inspectors are very busy in the area.
You are the person with the cheque book, so write your own rules and do it your way – not the agent's or the Vendor's. They (the agent) will try to steer you down the path of least resistence for them, and will try to talk you out of most things that will cause delays and/or obstacles for them and the Vendor.
There will be another "deal of the century" later on today somewhere else.
I did a calculation on the cost of our morning coffee at breakfast. My wife and I only have 1 or maybe 2 cups per day.
We buy a large 1 kg tin of the local supermarket home brand ground coffee, which is usually around $6, but can be found in the specials bin if one of the cans is dented (around $3.50). It is very nice coffee as well. Each tin lasts about 7 weeks.
We use tear off sheets of paper toweling for the filter paper, water from the filtered supply that runs through the fridge (so it's really just tap water) and we buy our milk in bulk (2 gallons at a time).
We bought a coffee maker from the same local supermarket for $30 about 15 months ago; still in use.The total cost per cup for a tin of coffee is approx 10 CENTS. If I manage to find one of the dented tins on special, who knows how cheap it is.
By contrast, we went to a local trendy cafe for brunch on Melrose Ave last week; triple shot Latte – $5.25. Thanks for coming, and won't be going back.
The scary thing is people here will do that 2 or 3 times a day; usually "to go".
All done
Don't know much about Fincorp, but Neil Jenman has a fairly in-depth story about Westpoint on his website, and a recent comment about Fincorp.
picklesam wrote:hi wealth4life, yeah i know what you're trying to say…but it's kinda hard to work on my roots now because i'm not academically or business smart, i struggled through highschool but still made it to uni…struggled through that too and now i have a pretty decent paying job, i'm pretty happy with how i turned out but don't know how i can get a better income job, I'm on a $95k package… going back to uni is not an option, i'd have to sell my ip at a loss…and i figured if i go back and studied to be a doctor or dentist i'd be in the highest tax bracket anyway, who needs all that stress? and LA, is your wife earning $85k USD? If so you reckon she can get me a job as a radiographer? Can i live in your place rent free? I'll pay all the bills…haha..had to try…Hey picklesam,
I am sure you could get work over here as a radiographer no problem; the hard part is getting here with the work credentials. You can apply for a work visa, but that will last a couple of years at best I think, the other way is a greencard; which is what we did.
Greencards are about 3-3.5 years to obtain and the process is a pain in the a**e. Check out in your field if they have a travel worker system like the nurses do.
We have a property in Kalgoorlie that we have owned since 2003. The property came with a GEHA lease, which I am assuming is similar to you situation, and they re-signed for another 2 x 2 lease.
We have never had a missed rent payment and the property is looked after by them. There has been an odd incident (domestics I gather) but basically trouble free, no vacancy and rent always paid.
Every Landlord dreams of this scenario. This could be a good time for you to consolidate some funds while the DoH lease runs, then work on the sub-division along the way, ready to go when the lease expires.
Wylie wrote:I know that Noel Whitaker seems to always advise paying $12 per $1,000 per month, but no more as this is the optimum repayment and will repay your loan in about ten years.Wylie
that's not a bad criteria; at 1.2% per $1,000 per month that is 14.4% per year. Unless interest rates climb to that level, you are doing well.
Why does he not advocate paying anymore than this?If you use the equity in your current PPoR as a deposit on the new PPoR, and then get a loan for the balance of the purchase price, the interest on that loan is NOT tax deductible as it is not being used for investment purposes.
You will be up for repayments on $550k plus costs (usually around 5-6% of purchase price). Total loan of approx $580k.
Assuming the loan is interest only, and the interest rate is standard market rate of about 7.5%, your interest payments alone will be around $43,725 per year; $3,643 per month. Ouch.
You would do better to rent out your current PPoR, and rent the house you need in the area you mentioned. All the holding costs on your PPoR will become tax deductible, while the rent you will pay on a nice house in the area of choice would be a lot less than a mortgage repayment I suspect. Use the equity from your current PPoR to buy further I.P's. Most people are averse to this strategy becuase of the strong emotional attachment of living in your own house.
Or, sell the current PPoR and use the profit as a deposit on the new house. Then you can redraw the equity from the new PPoR for investing, which does carry tax deductions on the holding costs and the loan. The problem is you will eat up a fair proportion of your profit from your PPoR in selling and buying costs to acquire the new PPoR.
Looks like a "secret for BoB Proctor " to get rich to me.
What would I know; I'm just old and cynical and have seen too many slick cons before by guys with perfect hair in tailored suits.
Another money making scheme targeting the weak of mind?