Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 501 through 520 (of 1,469 total)
  • Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    I am very fortunate to have a CF+ house in Quinns rocks but i was lucky as i bought it in 2002 with the FHOG and now owe $90K with $310K Equity

    I need to find my own apartment to live in as i am living at my parents place It's the cheapest rent you'll ever find, but as you know; it comes at a high emotional cost. Of course; we love our parents dearly (just can't live with them).

    Does anyone know where to find a 1 or 2 bdrm CF+ apartments in Perth?
    If it is to be your PPoR, why do you need to find a cfp unit?
     
    I have read from this forum that the real estate internet boards and newspapers and even buyers agents are not the best way to go if one has time on their hands to do it themselves. These are the main tools to use for finding properties. If you have more time, then you can door-knock and ask people if they want to sell. Buyer's agents are good for time-challenged folk, but you pay a fair bit for the service, and I think their fee wipes out a lot of the cfp possibility. 

    I have taken interest in reading that i should drive around the preferred areas i wish to live in and contact the real estate agents for their listing or look for private sale signs? Most apartments i have interest in sell for about $250K which is out of my range. The ones you are interested in are $250k, but what about any other units that are in your price range? If not, we can't help you a whole lot.

    I have also read "Rich Dad Poor dad" book and it says to make lowball offers.  Does the real estate agent have to take this to the seller legally? How do i know if they have presented my offer to the seller? Do i need to fill out an R/E agents offer form? 
    Low balling can sometimes work. Agents are required by law to present all offers, but you need to be realistic about what the Vendors might accept. The worst answer you'll get with a low-ball offer is 'no', so nothing to lose. If there is any positive response to your offer you can then fill out the Contract of Sale form. 
     
    I figure i can only afford to borrow $180K. ANZ LOC $50K (plus expenses) and Liberty $150? I am self employed with low income.If you can only borrow $180k, and the cheapest place is $250k, we may be wasting everyone's time until you can save some more money and/or decrease the loan on your PPoR and/or make a low-ball offer that is accepted.

    Does anyone out there have creative ideas they have used in the past besides finding places to renovate or buying in regional areas. I am looking for areas within 30K radius from the city NOR in Perth.You may need to move into your current I.P and make it your PPoR, then you may be able to use the equity in it to purchase another I.P. Your current loan balance is not overly high, so it won't be a massive burden if it is not tax deductible.You may even be better to re-finance that loan over a new 25 year term to make the repayments way less. The new I.P will have a new tax deductible loan, and the rental income is considered by the Banks towards your loan servicability.

    The house market is falling here as the Australian Property magazine says but what about apartments? I have read many American books such as Robert Kiyosaki, Donald Trump and even Australian Steve McKnight plus others but seem confused due to the fact that the market has changed a lot as i write August 2007. Do your own research on the Perth market and watch what is going on. The books you mention will be a bit general in nature, and if you are going to be a serious investor this will be something you need to become proficient at anyway.

    I have heard that auctions are a good way to find foreclosed properties. I have not as yet seen any apartments at auction in Perth? Bit of a myth in my opinion. I've been to a few, and everybody goes mad and bids it up to near market value in the end. I know in the USA there is money to be made in foreclosures, but their system is different to Aus and more involved.

    Sorry for the many questions but i am at preapproval stage for a LOC with ANZ for $100K and it will be just sitting there until i can figure out what to do with it. I have asked for a sub account to seperate personal and investment but i am told it is an extra $150 p.a. Total annual fees is $300 for the ANZ LOC  

    Would really like to get the ball rolling to see how investors have used their creativity to invest in more CF+ properties without being high income earners if this is possible? In this current climate it's hard to find cfp in cap cities. The best way to get the numbers close is to buy properties with good 'on-paper' deductions such as depreciation, and/or the ability to add some value somehow to increase the rent return and the cap growth. The property needs to be built after 1987 to maximise this, or have had a recent renovation that you can use for depreciation. You also need a pretty good rental return as well; something at least the same as the current loan interest percentage. If it's around 5% return you are wasting your time.
     

    Thanks a lot

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488
    wealth4life.com wrote:
    Hello Hutch,

    No I am not an expert and you should not jump too quickly … my point was, that i so badly did not get across was that – being around a little longer than most here not to rely on historical data with out taking into account current trends.

    It's easy to assume that if the stock market crashes where people would invest … i just believe that with the current interest rates here and the problems OS that people will sit.

    And you are incorrect also because that was not the original question … ditto

    D

    Wealth, you are pretty correct there.
    I met a guy over here on the golf course a few weeks ago who is retired, wealthy and we got to talking about (his) investments.
    He has sold a lot of his shares as the market was tanking, and I asked him about property and his prediction was that there was more bad news to come (he's right so far). He has moved a lot of his cash into the money market for now.

    I know he is just one guy, but he is just a normal everyday average retired guy, so I bet there are many more like him.

    (hey, I just realised I've made 1,000 useless posts!!)

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    I got 454, but there was no provision for the rental income, or did I miss it, and our PPoR is now also an I.P, so how does that work?

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    Another quick calc for you to go by;
    allow 20% of the rent to be eaten up by all holding costs (except loan interest) such as repairs, management, insurances and rates etc. This also includes 4 weeks vacancy, (and you probably won't use that bit).
    This is a slight over estimate, but if the numbers look good after this, you know you are going to be ok.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    $600 for both my wife and I and the I.P's.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    An I.P offer differs from a PPoR offer I reckon.

    To me; the numbers are important in an I.P selection. I work out what I'm prepared to pay, make that offer, if it's accepted good; if it's not, I move on – no emotion. I never counter-offer on I.P's.

    With a PPoR, you have an emotional attachment, so your offer could go higher if you really want the property. Most people tend to be like this. If you really want the property, and you can afford the asking price, offer that. Having said that, most Vendors are realistic and are prepared for an offer lower than their asking price, so you can safely offer 10% below asking without offending everyone, but be prepared to have to make a higher offer later.

    As for telling agents what your spending limit is, I never do, but with I.P's I give them a starting point. You also need to tell them exactly what you are looking for so they don't waste both your time and theirs. The more specific your criteria is, the better job they can do of matching you up with a property that you can afford and will like.

    They will always try to show you properties above that point as well; just in case. It's like an up-sell. In fact, I reckon most people end up buying a PPoR more expensive than they were intending to buy.

    It's also a good idea to have your finance pre-approved before you start to look as well. This gives you a position of strength when negotiating over someone who is interested in the same property but has to make their offer 'subject to finance'.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    Why would you offer them a reference after that treatment?

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    I agree with your post Perry;
    but this is an Aus forum and I think your ad will not get a lot of business in Aus.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    Option 1 could be the go;

    1. Purchasing a place (unit/townhouse most likely due to cost) as close to the city as possible as a PPoR and qualify for the first HBG. Fulfill the requirements there and then move back out to rent and have it as an IP to reap the rewards – hopefully. In turn, wait for the equity to build with the better CG that can be ideally expected closer to the city and start the IP portfolio that way.

    This way, you get the F.H.O.G, and can then move out later on to convert the PPoR into an I.P and keep renting. And you can move back in at any point as your PPoR. If you move back in before 6 years has elapsed as an I.P, you are not liable for cap gains tax if you decide to sell.

    There are numerous tax deductions associated with an I.P, but keep in mind you will probably be more neg geared if you are buying nearer the CBD.

    The downside is you need to move in, stay for a short time to fulfill F.H.O.G obligations, then move out again so you can convert it to the rental.

    Don't assume that buying nearer the CBD is an automatic cap growth train. Do some in-depth due diligence to select the right area and property. Many outer suburbs have out-performed the CBD in recent months.

    As for the rest ;
    -Fed Election; Just hope Johnny gets back in. Kev will give more handouts to the needy, they'll just spend it, the interest rates will have to go up to stop them. If in doubt; lock in the rate, but the flexibility may suffer.
    – Stock market; who knows. It's up and down every day right now. The housing market over here is still going backwards according to the reports, sub-prime companies still struggling. If there are lots of packaged investments (mutual funds, property trusts etc) tied up in the housing market then they could be in for a bad year. Super funds may take a hit.
    -Intertest rate rises; more to come I believe unless the consumers put the credit cards away (good luck).
    -America's recession; despite what the Congress says, this country is already in a recession. Actually; the country is broken. The productivity is up, but all the cash is going to the CEO's and the wealthy 1 percent, with many middle-management jobs being exported to places like India, so unemployment is up. Healthcare, education, social security, all have terminal heamhorrages; 45 million people without private health insurance (that they know of). Housing and finance industry is in a tail-spin. Real wages haven't kept up with inflation for about 20 years. Middle-class has disappeared, homelessness, bankruptcy –  all on the increase; mainly due to medical bills, but the housing woes will add to the new records being broken. How will this affect Aus? I think the weakening US economy and dollar will strengthen ours, improve overseas investment and keep our economy rolling along.
    – Should you purchase property now or wait; buy as soon as you can afford it, but study the market and buy well. There have been many monumental world and local events that have rocked the economies, but the well selected areas and properties keep on increasing in value.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488
    kenzel wrote:
    Hi All,

    Nina – I really hope things turn out better for you in the not too distant future.

    L.A. Aussie – You mentioned:
    "Read all the Margaret Lomas books, Noel Whittaker, Jan Somers, Peter Spann, Steve McNight's (later) books for nuts and bolts." – Are you able to recommend any specific titles from these Authors? I'm looking to by my PPOR in 1 year's time (and turn it into an IP) and would lke to better prepare myself knowledge wise.

    Regards,
    Ken

    Sorry to take so long to reply Ken; I just re-read this thread and saw your question.
    The answer is; read'em all!!
    Google all the authors and /or titles and you'll find them. All the above have their own websites (not sure about Pete Spann)

    Nina,
    As V8 said; you can apply a certain portion of the rent towards your loan servicability, and you can start out small in purchase price. 

    Another point; do you have to live in inner-city Brissy? Can you move out a bit and shave off $50 or $80 bucks a week on the rent? This is hard yards I know, but it may be worth it.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488
    kchoong wrote:
    Hi Nath,

    I could suggest you look into Cashflow Loan, i.e. you pay approx half of the interest only and the remainder is capitalised.  By doing this, your rent is probably sufficient to pay off the interest.  Hence, you will not be so negatively strapped.  This is a good strategy only if your properties are enjoying a pretty good capital growth.  If you need more info, please email me.

    Cheers. Karshin 
    [email protected]

    Be very careful of this type of loan. This is one of the main culprits in the recent implosion of the sub-prime lending industry in the USA.

    Basically, you are paying half the interest now, the rest is tacked onto the end of your loan. After a certain period (a couple of years or so) the loan reverts to the normal repayment amounts.

    The strategy with this type of loan is that the property will have gone up in value over this period to cover the extra interest that has 'capitalised' on the loan, so your LVR is still at an acceptable level, and you have cheaper repayments at the start to help with the cashflow.

    But the problem quite often is this; in 3 years time the borrower's financial situation has not improved, and they can't afford the new real repayments. They have to sell.

    On top of this, the property hasn't gone up much in value (no-one can predict this either), and the capitalised interest on the loan means the loan is now higher than the property is worth. The borrower now has to sell at a loss.

    The Banks and the Mortgage Brokers don't care because they make money out of loan churning and the trailing commissions on the loan.

    In my opinion, unless you have an absolutely 100% positive feeling that the property will go up in value more than the capitalised interest (will the M.B or the Bank give you a guarantee in writing?) then don't do it.

    If you need to use this type of loan; you probably can't afford the property.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    Yes, I reckon it's crazy; I know that people will pay huge amounts for units; but it doesn't mean they should. Just because 799 people bought those units doesn't make them smart; there are lots of people in the world with high incomes and no financial brains. It only makes them cashed-up, but now hocked-up.

    I hope the Sydney market recovers soon, and I hope the owners of those units have low LVR's but my guess is that they don't.

    The fact that you got yours a bit cheaper still doesn't mean it's a good deal. That's like saying I got a BMW for $80k when they normally sell for $90k. You still dropped $80k out of your wallet.

    Your unit may be cheaper than the other 199 in the complex, but that is a very expensive price tag for something with little ability to add value to, no land content (I realise not everyone wants land), and there are 600 more across the road. Are there any more projects in the pipeline that are similar and nearby? I'm tipping there are. This can impact on the supply/demand factor (see Melb inner-city apartments 3-4 years ago). 

    I guess if you are buying as a PPoR and are thinking long term living then it's not that much of a problem, but as an investment for cap growth…

    The fact that you are buying one of these units for a discount will be counter-productive for the values of all the others. If another one comes on the market next week the same as yours, the chances of it selling for what you paid are very good. And you can bet that the Bank will send in their valuer and he/she will say "well, there was one sold for only $535k last week, so that's what they're worth". I'm tipping there are a lot of very angry owners in that complex right now. You have effectively de-valued every unit in the complex. The good deal you thought you just got will have disappeared overnight. That's the danger of large unit complexes and I would never buy one as an investment.

    This affects future sales, given that many of these types of units are bought by investors who want rental yields and/or cap growth. In one transcaction your purchase has undermined the cap growth, and may retard future growth of the complex for a few years or maybe even more; especially if it is mostly investor owned.

    Do you know how many of the units are rentals? How many of the other 600unit complex are rentals? If the majority of them are owner-occupied you may be o.k, but if the majority are I.P's then this could be a problem.

    Anyway, good luck with it.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    Sorry to tell you, but they don't have 2 properties tieing up over $800k like you've done. I'm guessing you are heavily neg geared with these 2 properties as well?

    When you here the stories of people buying multiple properties in 10 mins, they are usually buying cashflow pos properties that are cheap and in regional/rural areas.
    They do quick renos and get them revalued, then use the increasing equity to buy again.
    Thios is all done in a booming market as well.
    Not to say that it can't be done right now, but it certainly is harder now than when those stories were written.

    Have you had Depreciation Schedules prepared for you properties yet? I'm assuming by the values of them that them are fairly new?, thus the 'on-paper' deductions may be substantial and improve your cashflow through better tax returns. The increased cashflow is poured straight back into the loans; this will help to accelerate your debt reduction and increase your equity faster.

    Other than this, I guess it's a matter of being patient and waiting for values and rents to rise, or try to find a pos cashflow property to offset the neg cashflow of the other two.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    Milly,
    being smug  and self-righteous is very annoying I agree, but if Neil Jenman can save even one family from a property scam then I want him to be as big a pain in the arse as possible.
    I also agree that he is out there trying to raise his profile, but I think you'll find that his motivation for doing so is more to raise awareness of the dodgy practices going on in the industry that cost us money than to make money for himself. Of course; he won't knock back any extra dollars that come his way in the process I'm sure, and good luck to him.
    I liken him to Derryn Hinch in his heyday; outspoken, arrogant, annoying, sometimes wrong and impetuous, but saved a lot of kids from further child abuse.

    Here's a recent post on Neil's site that may help to balance the view a bit:-

    FOXES REWARDED FOR CHICKEN PROTECTION
    Agent protectors are NOT consumer protectors.
    by Tim O’Dwyer

    WHEN Neil Jenman sent me a clipping of The Courier Mail's report on the 2007 winner of the Queensland Office of Fair Trading's TradeSmart Award, he added a frank warning. “Make sure you have a bucket ready," he said, "because this'll make you want to spew."

    I was more dismayed than sickened to read how Fair Trading Minister Margaret Keech had announced the Real Estate Institute of Queensland had received one of her department's Consumer Protection Awards. These awards, said the Minister, recognised some of the state's most innovative programs aimed at "promoting the rights of Queensland consumers".

    According to Fair Trading, the TradeSmart Award is intended to recognise achievement by a business, company or association in "promoting consumer protection".

    Why on earth would the REIQ be achieving anything other than its commendable promotion of agents' services and protection of agents' rights?

    No wonder Neil's bucket warning. Talk about foxes being rewarded for chicken protection!

    The REIQ says it "exists" to support member agents with information, products and resources to complement their business practices. Fair enough, but I wonder about the REIQ's assertion that this ensures "professional service for the public". Yet the REIQ says it also "supports the community".

    How?

    By providing relevant industry information about buying and selling property.

    Well, you can fool some of the people all the time, all of the people some of the time and, it seems, the Office of Fair Trading every time.

    Naturally enough the REIQ was feeling, in the words of its managing director Dan Molloy, "pretty proud" about receiving a consumer protection gong for establishing an accredited agency program.

    "Proactive programs like these, run by industry, encourage stronger consumer confidence in the market place," enthused the Minister. Not that stronger consumer confidence equates with better protection.

    Molloy explained that the institute wanted to raise the bar for the industry. (How low had the bar dropped beforehand, one might ask.) Improved "professional standards" would be widely recognised and publicly acknowledged.

    How?

    Accredited agencies would be identifiable by their use of accreditation logos ("a visual safeguard to help consumers make informed and confident choices").

    Last year Molloy's predecessor, Don McKenzie, unashamedly revealed that the bottom line was really to "motivate consumers to always use an REIQ accredited agency".

    Have agents' standards improved? Is the public better served? Are consumers any better protected?

    Gold Coast District Law Association president and Queensland Law Society councillor Ted Skuse speaks for most conveyancing solicitors when he says agents' preparation of contracts and other documents remains "lamentable".

    Skuse also points to common failings by many agents:

    * Not giving consumers genuine opportunities to obtain independent legal advice and representation.
    * Not completing contracts fully and accurately.
    * Not collecting reasonable deposits.
    * Not understanding the impact of GST on property transactions.
    * Late posting of signed contracts to solicitors, often after the expiry of cooling-off and other time limits.

    The Office of Fair Trading, in giving the award, confused improving customer service standards with consumer protection. The REIQ has no mandate from its members for consumer protection. That is Fair Trading's function.

    So it was a sad day when the Fair Trading Minister counted the REIQ among "Queensland's best consumer advocates".

    Helping real estate consumers confidently make informed choices (about which agents to use) hardly equates with consumer advocacy which involves standing up and speaking out for consumers.

    Meanwhile, don't hold your breath on one of Australia's most passionate consumer advocates – Neil Jenman – receiving a Fair Trading Award.

    His promotion and defence of consumer rights has necessitated not only criticising self-serving organisations like the REIQ but also tipping a bucket on lame governments, misguided ministers and misled regulators.

    ***************************

    Tim O’Dwyer is a Queensland solicitor
    [email protected]

    This article appeared in The Courier Mail in August 2007. Reprinted at the suggestion of the writer.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    $500k+ for a 3 bed UNIT?
    In a 200 unit complex?
    AND for you first PPoR?
    And there is ANOTHER complex across the road?

    you are a lot more brave than me.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    I had a bad tenant once who was a single, middle-aged working (nurse) mum with two younger boys. Good results from the credit check and references.

    It was in Mentone, in a brand new, high quality townhouse etc. great area, great property, high rent –  so, on paper, the combination of location, rent level, standard of property should produce a relatively troubl-free investment. But there is no guarantee the tenant will be any good. She was a nightmare to the other people in the complex (only 4 townhouses), regularly late with payments.

    On the flip side, I also have great tenants in one of our units in Frankston, who are both studying and working; not a lot of dough I'm tipping, and have never had a problem or a missed rent payment.

    All you can do is screen each tenant as best you can and hope they are ok. Even bad areas have nice people who need a place to live.

    But if you are looking to invest in an area that has potential trouble, the rent returns would want to be very good to offset the risk I reckon.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488
    millions wrote:
    Perth people aren't crying – most started investing in Bris,Melb Adelaide in the past 12 months.   We're all still smiling.

    So what have you been buying;
    houses?, units?, subdivs? – neg geared, pos geared?
    What has happened to those investments in 12 months and what was your plan when you bought them?
    If they are neg geared, has the cap growth kept pace or outpaced the shortfall?

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    I haven't ever bought Terry's reports, but I've read his books and follow the site. He is very respected and knowledgable, so I reckon they would be good value.

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    Have you done comparisons of recent sales of new and used similar properties in the immediate area to estimate their value?

    New complexes are often price loaded to cover developers' profit. Try to find out if there are a lot of these types of developments on the go – this could mean a possible over-supply in the near future and impact on your cap growth, or resale price if you ever need to sell, rent return etc.

    You may do better with a newer, but used apartment (still have good on-paper deductions) which has already had a re-sale. These are more accurate in terms of market value.

    Do some research on the rent returns for that type of unit, the rent demand, and check out the unit size – smaller than 50 m/s are hard to get finance for.

    Also look at the demographic trends; is the population increasing/decreasing, are there projects in progress or planned (in local council) for improvemets such as better roads, public transport, new shopping malls, take-away joints, schools, hospitals.
    These sorts of things signal increasing population.

    The "Cairns One" development; how many units are there? Keep in mind that many units in an apartment complex may mean lots of competition for tenants from other investors who buy in there. Go for more boutique, unique and smaller complexes with 20 units or less.

    Also look at the comparable cost of a house and land with subdivision potential in the future. It may be better to spend a bit more money and go this path, and you can add a lot more value to the investment than you can with a new unit/apartment. 

    Profile photo of L.A AussieL.A Aussie
    Member
    @l.a-aussie
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 1,488

    What is "rent stress"?

    Does it mean that people are paying more than they can afford for rent? 

    If that's what it means, then;

    move somewhere cheaper!!!!

                            

Viewing 20 posts - 501 through 520 (of 1,469 total)