wezwaz, I believe it is eminently possible to make 10% on 300k. That’s what this website is about, and people on here are already making 10%. However, as Derek said- you need to have paid your property off. You can get 10% return on 300k worth of property, but if you still owe 250k- you ain;t got nada (well, slightly more than nada, but still close to nada).
Is 30k enough to live on anyway, wezwaz? You would still be living on far less than the average Australian wage.
Russ, I get “in principle” approval immediately (but that means nothing). Then I get paper approval within about 24 hours (after I’ve applied for the loan. But that can be subject to the bank doing a valuation on the property the buyer may be purchasing (yours) and valuations on other properties the owner might have. I had to have 2 vals done- one on a property I own, and one on the new property. Took probably 5 working days. But with checks- BPI, and any other checks they may want to do, it is possible they need more time than that. So perhaps the buyer is stalling for time, wanting other checks to be done. Perhaps he or she is selling another property and waiting for finance to come through? I reckon it depends on how complex the buyer’s financial situation is. If they’ve got a bunch of debts and a bunch of assets, they may need to get clearance on stuff.
Ouch Houses. I think people who have a language other than English should be encouraged on here. Sometimes, people love forums like this because it;s a chance to practice their english writing skills. As a person who only has 1 language, I admire those who have more than one.
Houses, I agree with you that people get narky when there are discussions of ethics. But narkiness, when expressed respectfully, just makes up the mix or richness of the forum. It’s so good to have a balance!
Re Hans Jakobi’s product… I see Hans as more of a “clearing house” as in a person who collects products from other “gurus” and who sells them in a job lot. A lot of the products he sells (other people’s books and his own) come from varied approaches- which is a good thing, in my opinion! But basically, if you’ve read a lot of the books already, you’d have an idea where each of the authors is coming from.
Re your rural property, you’d probably have to work out- just how rural is it? If the current tenant leaves, will there be enough tenant population and infrastructure in the town to get the same rental? For 185k for a 3-bedroom unit in a rural place, is it newish? Post 1985 or 1987? Because if so, the depreciation allowances available will push up your yield.
Sounds like you’re on your way though. Maybe Derek can push you around a bit more if you need it [strum]
I personally would buy 10 IP’s in one place if I thought it was the “right” place for me. It depends on where it is. I am happy to look all over Australia for properties- and don’t limit that search. But searching is one thing, and purchasing is another. Your question has so many complexities really. Whrever you buy, you’d probably be looking for things like value and sustainability. If you’ve found the IP town/region/city of your dreams, then why not?
My purchases are quite random really- if I find something I like, and I can afford it, I buy.
Use whatever criteria you usually use… like $$$ numbers, or population fundamentals, or post 1985/1987 properties (depreciation) or whatever is important to you. And then buy whatever fits- in whatever place
You said you weanted a “general agreement” from people- good luck! what you will get is individual’s different ideas.
I don’t see the amount of deposit one puts down as having anything to do with yield. yield – to me- is yearly rental divided by purchase price, then move decimals. Then I can work out why the yield is – for me.
Some people whack in a big deposit and then have what *I* personally would see as an inflated percentage yield. Other people might choose to count purchase price PLUS all costs throughout the year- in which case their percentage yield might be very low.
However you calculate it, the only person you need to explain it to yourself. If people are putting in 40% deposits so they can rave about their multiple figure yields, I think they’re kidding themselves.
Haaaaaving said what I said, I guess I was considering longer-term financial partnerships (the thought raises nightmares for me)… however, if there were 5 people who had say 50k each and there was some sort of short deal…. and there was a real chance of some kind of significant CG… and the risk wasn’t excruciating… and it would be over quickly… then I would consider it.
Overall, in a deal like that (asI said, short-term), I would be looking for the partners to:
(1) have stable personalities. I think the thing which can destroy anything can be those who lose (a) the plot
(b) their temper
(c) sight of the shared and common vision of the members
(2) be a similar financial position to begin with. I wouldn’t want the partners to be:
(a) in such a position that they would lose the shirts off their back if the deal didn’t work out
and the money was lost- this could lead to desperate or unreasonable decisions being made
(b) in such a position that the 50k menat nothing, in which case the person might be overly-cavalier or speculative.
The deal would also have to be watertight in legal terms, looked at by a lawyer independent to each partner, and each person would share equal profit or loss.
The deal would also have to be of about 3 months duration- quick enough to get excited about, and not so slow that I would get too stressed. I don’t like waiting- it gives me chest pains )
Re family or friends… I would NEVER do a financial deal with family members (I love them too much and family relationships can be complex enough without making it financial). With friends, they would have to fit into the above personality types and financial situation.
Bennett- have you had your questions answered? Please ask further specifics if you wish and I hope you’re not distracted too much by the bickering in this post.
I am not sure it is bad press that is going to change wraps- I think it is the govt making changes to the law.
Whilst the VFA is “regulating” wraps- correct me if I’m wrong here, Pelican, but the VFA could only suggest “guidelines” for its members- not “regulations” right? (I ask this because I am constantly having to work in an environment where the powers that be make “guidelines” instead of policy/regulation, and then those guidelines remain unenforceable).
If the govt regulates, UK, via changes to the Credit Act or whatever, then participants in the industry will have to comply.
I also think that for those lower income earners who have used wraps .. if one looks at the price of properties in 2004, then many of them might not be able to afford a wrap. I would say the market would have to correct significantly downwards, for wraps to remain vogue in 2004.
Mel, I would be interested to see some quantitative research, actually, on the incomes of those who have bought property via wraps. It really seems unchartered territory, and so, we can only speculate on the demography.
Does the VFA have statistics on wrappees, Pelican?
I am hoping to exchange on what I think is a hot property this week ) Negatively geared at 6% yield and maybe not in a hotspot you’re looking for- sydney city I’m hopelessly excited though [hair2]
Yep, what I posted was just info from a company. Thought it might be a bit of a break for the author though, while the Mortgage brokers squabbled :+P At least there’s info on what’s provided there.
It says there are 4 100% loan providers, but doesn’t name them. [thumbsdownanim Presumably, Bluestone and Pepper are two of these. Someone else might be able to name them?
Dexter, if you’re still about *poke*, my recommendation would be to get some money together before you borrow. Remember, ya still have to pay it back!!
Probably depends on which state you live in. A townhouse in NSW is a two-story place. In nsw, a one-story place like yours would probably be termed a “villa”.
Isn’t the point that with CF+, a lot of people are not actively seeking CG: they are seeking CF, and CG is a bonus? That’s the difference between neg gearing and pozz gearing. But if there is no substantial growth for CF+ properties, well, the rental yield will still be there- unless the tenants leave- and why would they unless there’s an entire economic downturn. Remember, economic growth is healthy right now, so we’re not looking at recession kind of conditions, where people would up and leave to the capital cities. Of course, country areas usually have younger people leaving them for educational and employment opportunities- but that’s a fundamental and probably not relevant here.
Ok- let’s say there’s an overall reduction in “values” of properties. It means CF+ *AND* CG properties decline. The CF+ prpo[perties will still be able to cope with an IR rise (the return just becomes less percentage wise), but with the CG prop, value is lost, yield (on value) reduces, and an IR rise means serviceability is under threat.
We all lose with price drops (unless we’re buying).
“So those who have purchased in the last 18 months will soon be looking at negative equity and VERY slow growth and the problems of owning properties – repairs, tenants, cleaning, painting etc, etc.”
depends… I bought a property, August 2003 – bank val says it’s increased by 30%. Property I bought at Xmas has increased by 20% (bank val done a week ago). It’s not all doom and gloom. And I intend to keep buying too. Hoping to conclude a purchase in sydney this week (fingers crossed!!) Because i’ve never *relied* on CG (always seen it as a bonus), then it doesn’t bother me much what prices do- if my IP’s happen to double over 15 years, i’ll be stoked. I did sell off an IP in March though, and still got boom prices for it, so sometimes it’s good to get out (for underperforming properties) when the going’s good.
If you think prices are declining, yack, it might be time for you to buy another IP?
ezy… think about it. What Sam has written is virtually an ad anyway. People who are interested in his block of regional units can private message him- what’s the difference?
There’s a no ad for properties policy here. People can message Samwise for his info.
You could also upgrade the finishes- to say, granite or marble kitchen and vanity (don’t overcapitalise though). Things like downlights might help. Also, in my underground car space, my car has a lockable “car cage”. It doesn’t take up any more room, but it makes me feel safe about my car.
Another thing you can do is furnish the unit. That can bevery attractive to Inernational students- it will give you more rent, make your place eminently saleable, and provide you with depreciation benefits.