Well, if you pay $1000 for a course… and $200 of that is deductible, and you are on the highest taxable income @50% tax, you get back $100 = 10% of the cost. That’s kind of like an argument for negative gearing. I think RE education *is* free- on forums like this, and by reading whatever one can lay one’s hands on, including media articles.
If one wanted to try out any RE strategies- developing, flipping, B&H, using depreciation, etc etc, one can do them without using expensive seminars. I think many people attend seminars for confidence, as well as anything else. Certainly most seminars have a personal development component to them these days.
I bet many, many people on here who haven’t attended seminars feel happy with the choices they’ve made in RE.
I went to the Money Expo in Sydney today- so many seminars are on right now- including that zany guy, Roy McDonald- oh, he’s back- I’m excited- I love cults! I really wanna go to his- except I’d be a bit worried about the lack of food and the sleep deprivation- hehe. I was told he has seminars from $1000 – $20,000. I wonder what “secrets” he reveals at his 20k seminar. He must have lots of them up his sleeve to charge those kinda prices.
Well, the crest, as long as the original author doesn’t mind, and feels as if his quesiton has been answered… some topics wax and wane. That’s usually ok.
hehe Manic- bad luck about the footy… it IS footy you’re talking about? :o)
There’s some interesting threads on “status” on here, Manic- I’d pull up the link if I wasn’t dog-tired. As for me, my political nature is anarchist, so I don’t really distinguish between “average” and successful or whatever. One of my oft-quoted favourite thoughts is this one from Desiderata:
“If you compare yourself with others,
you may become vain and bitter;
for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.”
I don’t know what seking “financial independence” really means. I work, and enjoy my work, and I enjoy property- I love it, in fact. My father and my grandfather loved property, and I inherited the desire. To me, it’s an aesthetic thing, as well as anything else. I guess if we were no a collectibles board, there would be some who saw the $$$ value of the collectibles, and others who just enjoyed knowing about the items, and learning more about them.
I think people can have different interests and aims in property. Sometimes, I think about the money side of things, but at others, I just like learning about property, and discussing it.
I’m super happy I have a couple of properties. Any money from them means that I can be comfortable in life, but it will be many years until I pay them off. Money can buy some comfort, but it can’t buy happiness. And the latter is the important thing to me.
What does financial independence mean? I already pay for myself, and don’t rely on anyone to pay my vills for me. I see that as independence. It’s *possible* that one day I may live off rents, but that merely means other people will be working, and I’ll be living off them. I’m quite happy at the moment doing the job I do. I don’t “plan” as such, but I see myself as working until I’m 65, getting super, and developing more skills through my working life.
I’m very average, Manic. There’s genocide happening in Sudan at the moment, and I kind of like to keep my property interests in perspective with the kind of privilege that I have in being able to make those choices. But it’s not everything.
I’ve noticed it is my cheaper property, that needs more repairs/maintenance- anyone else noticed that? Cheaper = cheaper rent, but more maintenance. Given that tradespeople don’t charge on a pro-rata as per rental income basis, it’s annoying.
You’re right about tenants being entitled to live in a liveable space, for sure. Makes me think, though, that cheaper properties can be too high maintenance for me.
I’m an average Joe. I just have a love of property. There’s multimillionaires on here, and folks who don’t yet have a property. I sometimes think there’s too much emphasis on heirarchies. I’d like to think that anyone- no matter how average- can have an opinion on anything- no matter how average that opinion might be
Amazing that there might be some people who’d nick a wallet :o( I remember at work one day, a guy who I worked with said that he and his wife got a big “bonus” one day when they found a wallet with 500 bucks in it. The wallet also had ID in it, but they chose to keep the money. I couldn’t believe this guy was bragging so openly about stealing someone’s money! It was one of the most disgusting things I had heard. Epilogue: They guy has now left our workplace [biggrin]
Maybe the wallet fell behind the seat of the taxi… I lost a bunch of keys in a taxi once and they couldn’t be found- can’t imagine anyone would nick a set of keys. Maybe taxi seats are like lounges in shared households- all full of treasures that noone ever finds.
Or maybe someone will have a pang of conscience and hand it back in- I hope so :o))
New construction declines -> Unemployment increases -> affordability reduces -> demand reduces.. but meanwhile, prices fall due to reduced demand, so affordability can increase. I think we see evidence of that happening now. If prices were still at peak, that’s when affordability is hopeless for new entrants to the market, and that’s when it’s a landlord’s market. I think the slowing of the market will lead to more FHO’s leaving our rentals and buying themselves.
Immigration, and temporary visitation (as in international visitors, such as students) ensures there’s new tenancy markets.
We lose a market (FHO’s)… we gain a market (migration/visitors)… but if the market slows on construction, and unemployment increases, then rents will be limited anyway. People have to have jobs to pay city rents (particularly in sydney).
I think the way some people on this forum can get 10+ investment properties in a few years (and not on a huge income), is not to buy the big 400k number, but to buy rather cheaper houses. So if you decided to, you could buy 8 X 50k houses… instead of one 400k house. Then you could say you had 8 houses
The theory (and practice, for many on here) is to basically buy a house for 50k, and get over 100 bucks rent for it (about 10% rental yield). So the 410k house you buy has 250 bucks yield (about 3% gross) but the 8 X 50k houses would have, between them, 800 bucks a week rent.
This is not merely theory- many on here do just that. However, with the changing market and recent capital gain for almost every area of australia… it’s harder to come by those 50k houses (even if you want to). You’re left with mostly mining towns and country towns (not that there’s anything wrong with that- just depends on if ya want that as your portfolio).
Your 410k house will require money from your pocket (negative gearing) and Fitzgerald is an advocate of that. One point of negative gearing is relying on notion of capital gain for well located properties. Positive gearing proponents are focussed more on rents (although pozz geared places have mostly enjoyed some CG too during the boom).
So if you have an income focus, you might want to buy the cheaper houses. If you have a growth focus, you may want to buy more expensive houses. 8 cheap ones = 1 expensive one…. less rent may equal potential for growth (but not guaranteed)… more rent = you pay nothing from your pocket, and it’s possible that these might achive CG too (but not guaranteed).
I think Fitzgeralds’ stuff has sensible strategies, but you might want to just buy a bunch of books rather than pay a few grand on seminars/products when you first start out.
The notion that land always appreciates in value… well, not in some rural locales. You can still buy land in some places of Australia for $1000 a quarter acre- just as you could ten years ago, and, I imagine, just as you will be able to do in 10 years time for those same blocks.
Whilst I don’t agree that ALL land appreciates (some does- particularly when it’s in scarce supply), buildings do depreciate. Hence, one could use depreciation allowances, kindly brought to you by the Tax Department Post 1985/87 properties have these, and they can reduce your tax.
Sam, you’ve said buying interstate isn’t an option. You’ll find on here that many people have bought land all over australia- and beyond. You might see this as an option later- dunno, you may not
Final point of this tome… one 400k property with a low rental yield, will have you paying it off for a long time. Prices are slowing around many parts of Australia. So you have many, many options to buy well. There may not be a need to rush in right now.
I checked out the Adelaide forum website. I guess some folks have decided to move the seminar focus from “rich and happy” (mind) to “rich and healthy” (body). I don’t much see the link between wealth and body, much. Actually, nor do I see much link in wealth and mind- hehe. I just see money as money
I reckon you’ll be kept busy with Hans’ stuff- his clearinghouse packs give megabooks. And yeah, I’ve been getting stuff from Jamie too (“I can’t believe you haven’t enrolled yet!!!!!!!!!” aka “what is wrong with you missing this fabulous opportunity”). I tend to think Jamie doesn’t take people off his mailing list *pokes him* because I asked to be taken off after their first follow-up call.
I think it’s important to develop a good relationship with the RE agent when you decide who it will be. There may be times when you feel you need to contact them (“is it sold yet? is it sold yet? ad infinitum…) so it’s good if you choose a RE agent you can relate to- not completely based upon price and bottom line- but also on how they deal with you, the vendor- not only prospective buyers.
I used the agency who managed my property and the agent who sold me the property- he knew it insde and out, so half the legwork was done. Also, because we had known each other for some time, I felt I could trust him- goodwill counts for a lot, in my opinion.
Another thing I did after sale, was to let the Principle of the RE agency know that I was really pleased with the efforts of the agent- I think sometimes they cop a lot of criticism, and don’t get much praise… and a good way to help them in their job is not just to thank them, but to tell their boss that the individual is doing a good job.
This article “names names”. I think though, that suburbs that have “lost value” can be the ones to look at. If you are looking at suburbs that have increased value, then you’ll be paying premium.
wayne, and heya Life (cute curtain smilie- I love that one) :o)
Cynicism can happen, but I work on critique and analysis. I’m an optimist and I believe what people say, so (thinking about the Victor Ollis thread), I believe something can be ok, until I read evidence to the contrary. But I research everything like a mofo, so I find out what I’m getting into.
I have an ex, who once said “never be bitter- it’s one of the worst things in life.” And I’ve always remembered that. So it doesn’t matter how life can disappoint, because I remain optimistic. It helps that I spend my intimate time with people who have a similar outlook and values- it acts as a reinforcement.
LifeX, I still get very angry and sad about injustice in the world, but within my personal sphere, and with anything that might have occurred within my past, it still doesn’t change my perspectives. I have never have a “social worker” attitude to life, but rather a “social justice” approach.
I once lived in the outback, and I saw so much injustice there. It upset me greatly. My mother said I needed to toughen up, so I wouldn’t be so affected. But I saw many people there, who were so embittered, so angry, and so alcoholic (to cope with an environment they told me they hated being in), that I felt I never wanted to become like that.
Dunno, for me it helps to think things can change. Eveyone’s been hurt and messed around, I guess. Some people “become” that disappointment, and it’s a challenge to not become cynical… but it can make life a lot “lighter”, I reckon. Otherwise, it can just becomes baggage that grows.
“Property VS Shares, at the sydney Money Expo this Friday (today) @ 1pm:
The Great Debate
Louis Christopher, Pam Walkely, Patrick Bright, Angus Geddes, Ron Bewley, John Aldersley
Title: Property Versus Shares
Time: Friday 1.00pm
Don’t miss this exciting debate that will allow you to hear presentations from the experts and ask direct questions.
Property:
Louis Christopher, MD – Australian Property Monitors
Pam Walkley, Editor – Money Magazine
Patrick Bright, CEO – EPS Property Search
Shares:
Angus Geddes, MD – Fat Prophets
Ron Bewley BA, PhD, FASS, Head of CommSec Quantitative Research
John Aldersley, MD – Direct Portfolio & Columinist Herald Sun
Thanks shaun for the article. It is, to me, a reminder that property is a long-term investment. I’ll just be happy to pay my properties off and have them as assets. CG’s a bonus, and even if property experiences negative growth, at least one has rents I think if one buys and holds for the long-term (45 years?) then at least value-maintenance is almost guaranteed.
kay henry
Viewing 20 posts - 621 through 640 (of 2,632 total)