I hear what you’re saying about regulation/deregulation… thing is though, mechanics have to be qualified to fix our cars; and builders have to be qualified to build our houses. It’s that kind of regulation i am talking about. Sometimes people *will* fork out heaps of $$$ to find a way out of their problems. I’d be interested to know the kinds of things people are dealing with when they sign up for these 6k weekend away fiascos. I bet they’re as vulnerable as anything- or why would they go? This Landmark stuff is all about self-esteem. If it was a forum about budgeting or finances, then it wouldn’t be so [mad] but it’s all about taking a large amount of money from people, and telling them their life will be changed. I’m surprised if such an epiphany would work for most people.
Mostly, I think this stuff is about American marketing. “get rich now” “change your life” blah blah blah. One can make changes by reading some sensible investment books, rather than becoming poor by paying these dudes.
Yep- the 7-10 year figure is usually the one use used (by Somers etc).
Alf, I can’t comment on your figures, but the question is an important one. The premise of CG is what I’m wondering about. Ya know, in 2004, if you buy a property, there might not be growth at all- for some years. I bought a property and for 4 years after I bought it, there was no growth and negative growth in the area.
I never presume growth. I may hope for it, but I won’t assume it for purchasing reasons- not in 2004, at least. So when I discuss growth properties (oh, and I do do that [blush2] ) then I guess I am talking about the kind of locations that *have* traditionally achieved growth. However, past performance is not a complete indicator for future growth. [baaa]
I think property is an *investment* meaning I put money into it. I just don’t wanna put in too much. Point of this post is… some propertiesd that are negatively geared now… may be much more negatively geared in the future if oversupply (-> static or reducing rents), and/or rising interest rates, and/or negative or no growth, occur. There was no growth in pre-boom times, in many areas, and that may occur again post-boom.
If people need therapy, then community health centres provide free counselling- and you’ll be with qualified people- and generally, they don’t use “tricks” on people. I think these seminar people who use psychology (mostly pop psychology) should be regulated. If ASIC regulates spruikers around giving financial advice, the Australian Psychological Association should be regulating spruikers to prevent them playing with psychology.
If a person has a pre-existing psychological condition, apparently they are not allowed do the Landmark course. but that says it all, i think: “already feeling unwell? Well, this course is gonna send you over the edge, so we won’t let you do it…” The kind of screening they do would send alarm bells to anyone.
The “fear session” that I described earlier… Gee, I’d pay 6k to imagine that i’m being killed by everyone in the world- hehe… i imagine that even if one did not have a pre-existing psychological condition before these events, they may have such a condition after.
It’s possible you could put up a “for lease: Unit blah” sign in the apartment block, and a resident in the block might have a friend who is looking for a place. Or the resident may be paying more rent currently in their unit, and may want to move into yours.
The difference I see is that income from property has some guarantee (ie 6-12 month lease) whereas income from shares is not a guarantee, unless you get that share insurance thing Jamie McIntyre talks about.
Below is an article I find interesting. It’s about “Maximum prudent leveraging” (MPL) and discusses the difference between what banks will lend, and what is might be *safe* for consumers to borrow (shares or property). The article is American, but the principles (and much of the info) is the same.
I just went to google.com.au and looked up “katanning” (australian sites only). The first site I looked at was the Council website, and then I looked at the minutes of the last meeting, which is where I saw about the abattoirs. Then I went to that article I provided the link for, and read it. As you can see, it’s a research report done by someone at the Uni of Tasmania, and the focus is on Katanning’s access to VET. But it had so much good info about everything, that I thought I’d post the link. Actually, I’ve found some VET reports and research papers to be very valuable, because many of them discuss the issues of small and rural communities, so they’re really comprehensive.
rjk, I don’t think there’s any *organic* reason not to buy multiple properties in one location- it would depend on the location. I would buy multiple places in the locations I have bought into- *if* I could pay the same prices I have paid- but no point living in the past :o)) It’s a matter of assessing “risk vs reward”, I guess, or doing a cost/benefit analysis or whatever. As I guess you’d have thought about, rjk, really small communities can have more risks sometimes than larger communities can, but if you think your properties are sustainable, then why not?
No worries, you I have to admit, I do that kind of looking up, partially for my own benefit too. One of my favourite things is cults. I am a cultaholic, if you will. So if I get an oportunity to do some reading about one, it meets my needs, too.
60 Minutes is doing a story on them- check this out:
“Have you been to a Landmark forum? 60 Minutes would like to hear from anyone who has done a course with Landmark Education in Australia. Please e-mail us, phone 02 9438 3433 or fax 02 9436 0527.”
(interesting that it says that the Scientologists tried to shut Landmark down because it’s a competitor- hehe- I didn’t know cults were so competitive- that’s not very caring of them![baaa] Here’s an excerpt from that article:
“One section of The Forum he attended, Plywaski says, was a “fear session” during which participants were asked to close their eyes and imagine that the person sitting next to them wanted to kill them. “Then it was all the people around them,” he says. “That brought on the first moans and cries. Then it was all the people in the room wanted to kill them. There were screams.
“By the end, everyone in the world wanted to kill us. I cheated and opened my eyes. There were people writhing on the floor, kicking and screaming…just like at the old tent revival meetings. And what is the purpose in either instance except to instill fear so that you can control them…’Only Jay-sus can save you’…’Only Landmark can give you heaven on earth.'”
“They want to replace your individual values, experiences, morals with their values, experiences and morals. Your way of looking at the world with their way of looking at the world. Your mind with their mind.”
____________________________-
Gatsby, if you remember hearing of the names “The Forum” and “est”, these are the same people. Different names, same cult.
Also they use lots of psychological drama stuff- regression, gestalt.. all a bit dangerous in the hands of the novice.
Thousands of dollars for therapy, basically- and very expensive and dangerous therapy- probably by unqualified salespeople.
Questioning or critiquing something doesn’t mean one works for a competitor, Colio… just like supporting something or someone, doesn’t mean one works for them.
People can make up an email and a nick and avatar, but it’s pretty easy to tell who the multiples are due to their spelling and grammar… not to mention their IP address
I am kay henry- the other person is henry kaye :o) And I follow noone
bennido- all these people say different things- one minute they are saying “multiple stream of income”; the next they are saying diversification is risky or whatever. One says “don’t be in the herd…” and then you have a million investors mooing “I am not in the herd!” (a la life of brian “we are all individuals”). One says do the opposite of what everyone else does… etc etc. doesn’t matter what any of them TELL us to do- they’re not the boss of us. Much of what the gurus say probably makes sense if they didn’t constantly sound like trashy amway advertisements.
Many subjects might be in different areas- some specifically business/accounting, others law/accounting; or real estate/accounting. You could probably study some subjects externally to your current course, to get the kind of specifics you need. It’s possible that these could then be accredited to you later through another institution.
I’m a renter, but I would own my own home if I could afford it. I took the investment property road, and I pay cheap rent, but having one’s own home- well, it has to be a good thing :o) As for paying 350k for a home… well, it depends on where you live, but 350k is a modest home in many parts of Australia now. for example, in sydney, that might get you a one-bedroom apartment- have you looked at the market lately? Houses ain’t cheap. I don’t see your ideas as overly-ambitious at all.
Will you lose money in 3-5 years if you sell? Who knows? Will any of us? We might. I try to be realistic about capital gain or capital loss- nothing is guaranteed. Many seminars and property spruikers and real estate books and sites will tell you how much money you’ll make, but in a slower market, I think it’s healthy to not expect quick riches.
If interest rates go up, and they probably will at some point throughout your loan, then you might need to hope for a pay rise, or to pay off extra money throughout your loan, so that you are ahead- as a contingency plan. Are you in a job that has wage rises in line with CPI, or that negotiates a wage renewal package every few years? If so, you should be fine. Interest rates can increase, but so can wages, so all is not lost.
You probably are (fiscally) better off renting- dunno. But if you buy your own home, you can always increase your equity and then use that equity as a deposit on an investment property.
Only you can make your choices about buying a home. but if you’ve got around 80k saved, you’re doing extremely well )
Oops- just thought of something. PPOR’s (your own home) can be thought of as a “liability”, because the interest you pay, and expenses, are not tax deductible, and you earn no income from it. But because you can use it as equity to purchase “income-producing” investments.
Here’s an article which discusses manydemographic details of Katanning, including population, age distribution, industry/employment, education, … plus lots of stuff about the issues facing the town. It says that the trend of the leaving of youth from Katanning is second only to Broken Hill. for those interested, Katanning has a population of over 4000.
A quick look at that site, suggests it is lease options they’re talking about? And they’re targetting people who earn 46k per year (the average aussie wage) with a challenged credit history… so I guess many of the eligible won;t be traditional wrap clients.