hehe! Missing deadlines- ahh, yes- I know it well. So do you get in trouble when you miss a deadline? Or do they say “oh, that’s just Stuart- he can’t help it.”
Well, just one more, rogue… Celivia’s use of the word “redundant” was correct. If only public schools were funded by the government, that would make private schools redundant (unnecessary) or superfluous.
I think it’s often a matter of affordability in rent. Generally, community housing organisations have said that 30% of income is ok not to put tenants into “stress” when paying rent (or mortgage). If a benefit pays about $200 a week, then I guess it depends on how much we are charging tenants for rent. If we are charging them $150, then obviously they are going to find it hard to pay rent and live. If a person is earning $1000 a week (net) and we are charging them $300 a week rent, then they are going to be under less stress to pay- just on the pure numbers, but if we charge anyone a high % of their income, they will struggle.
If landlords charge unemployed people huge rents, then they can end up homeless- just so we can add on that extra % to our cashflow.
And yeah, diclem, some people are bad tenants or disorganised. I know for me, I get my rent taken out electronically, because I am never organised enough to pay it.
Yeah, I know we’re on the same page here :o) We just have different opinions on things- remember, I’ve always complimented you on your posts on property… it’s your posts on politics where we differ
From the media, economists peg that an IR rise might now occur in December @ .25% (despite who wins the election). Certainly, new building and loans are still in the “boom” domain, I reckon. Lower prices for properties, as is now occurring, will mean that first home buyers can now approach the market.
Stuart Wemyss wrote a great article in this last edition of API mag about how people can manage their mortgage debt. I reckon the 105% borrowers are now going to have to get out their calculators and wonder if they can buy some bread. OPM is fine if you also have some of your own, but I reckon, for yo7ur average mortgage holder, it’s time to get the LVR lifted as a safety net.
Look at some of Margaret Lomas’ books. She buys newer properties and uses depreciation to make properties CF+. I was just readingf an article on CF+ property in API magazine. It says that properties only need to have a yield of about 6% to be CF+. Go figure… but depreciation on newer (post 1985/87) properties help to get the yield up by getting the money back in your tax as an offset.
“I know of two ‘spruikers’ who tell people not to negative gear (one even makes you yell it out).”
That is SO funny! I mean, the thing is, many of the people who became property millionaires quickly over the last couple of years were people who had one or two crappy terraces in the middle of sydney (and other capitals). Almost overnight they achieved huge gains. I am sure now, they are not slapping themselves upside the head because they were only achieving a 4% yield… not when they bought that IP in St. Peters or leichhardt for 375k in 1998, that they then sold it in 2002 for >$1 million.
Positive gearing is great, if you can do it. But it’s only ONE method. I reckon the whole “negative gearing is for fools” industry, needs a big rethink in retrospect viewing of the boom. Overnight millionaires didn’t need seminars to help them make those gains. Anyone who had a few IP’s in major capitals and flogged ’em off in the peak of the boom would pretty much be a net millionaire now. I am sure they are happy with their method.
Interestingly, in article on CF+ property in the last API magazine, a CF investor said he would ensure he got yields of 20% when there was no real opportunity for CG (tested over a 10-year period).
MadCat, sorry to advertise API here :o) but if you buy it, you can see rental yields ofr all towns and cities in Australia, and there is a percentage done of yields over the past ten years. Re your question of yields rising over 5 years… well, not necessarily. Some do and some don’t. Think about how much unempoloyment benefits, for example, have gone up over the last 5 years- not much. It depends on the demographic you’re lending to. Some mining towns can have high income earners, so yields can be dictated by a small IP market. But if your IP is in a town with a shrinking population and a number of empty houses, and much of the town is unemployed (as is the case with some very tiny isolated towns), then it’s a renter’s market, and you may have to *reduce* rents.
The same can be said, of course, for some inner-city oversupplied markets- if IP’s outweigh the number of renters, sometimes we have to compromise.
Neil Jenman is one of the people opposed to this kind of disgraceful behaviour. On his website, he mentions how some of the real estate course notes mention people volunteering in retirement homes to access the aged market. It’s hardly charitable volunteer work when the agenda is to coerce the elderly. Jenman has actively lobbied against these kinds of practices.
Monopoly, you misunderstand. I was saying that because I, for example, went to private schools, doesn’t mean I support the private system- I support public health, transport, education- even public housing!
And I thought your use of the word abolishment was interesting, that’s all.
I don’t think anyone is tarring and feathering private schools. I think the discussion is about funding. Is teachers in public schools are overworked and there is a high staff:student ratio, then funding would make class sizes smaller, and allow more teachers.
There are people who attended private schools who support the public system. The author of the original speech at Scotch College is one of these. To be a product of a system doesn’t mean one has to defend that system.
I work in the public education sector, so we often discuss funding to education in general. To me, funding to schools, TAFE and Universities is all a part of the same pie. The analogy seemed an apt one to me- public education goes from schools to University.
Actually, Monopoly, John Howard attended Sydney University.
hehe- no Anubis- that wasn’t what I said, or what i suggested. I said “schools” and “Universities”- I have no idea how anyone would mix those two up.
I really can’t help how people read things, but I do know the difference between private schools and public Universities- I just assume everyone does.
I am saying the Federal govt spent more money on private schools than on Australia’s 38 public universities. Am i comparing apples to pears? I don’t think so. I think all schoolkids are entitled to go to a University, if that’s what they want to do.
Here’s a quote for ya:
“More than two-thirds of direct Federal Government education funding goes to the one third of students in private schools. In 2004 funding to private schools exceeded funding to public universities.”
That’s from Maree O’Halloran- head of the NSW Teachers’ Federation.
PS Why do you use the word “pontificate”, when you refer to my post? it has a clear derogatory component.
May God prosper you always.[biggrin]
Marc
Marc, it just seemed like the right word to use- it just came into my head as the one that suited. Dictionary.com defines pontificate as:
“1. To express opinions or judgments in a dogmatic way”
(no. 2 definition is to be a pontiff)
I notice that when anyone disagrees with you, you say that they don’t know what they are talking about, that it is their subconscious dictating what they say, that they are brainwashed by norms etc… and you use the word “evil” a lot, which suggests you have some kind of religious undertone in what you say. So basically, you are being a bit of a Pope :o) Hence, pontificate seems to suit don’t take it as derogatory- the Pope speaks the truth, and many listen to him As the Pope, he is constantly pontificating.
As there is no cooling off period, don’t be pressured into signing a contract by a RE agent. Get it sent to your solicitor, and do all your checks and arrange finance before you sign anything.
The WA Real Estate Institute will hopefully be changing their rules soon so they have a standard cooling off period, if people need one. It seems ludicrous that tassie and WA don’t have a CO period, Vic has a 3-day period and other states have a 5 day period. That kind of inconsistency is bizarre.
Abolition? Yes, we are certainly a product of our environment and schooling :o)
Last year, there was more spent on private schools than there were public Universities :o(( Now, private Universities (Notre Dame and a bunch of others) are increasingly getting public funding. Notre Dame is starting up two new campuses in sydney, and is getting a $43 million grant from the Federal government for capital works. They will have a bunch of nursing places… and meanwhile, the sydney university undergraduate nursing places are all being lost.
Private education can have a place, but it is a shocker when public places are lost to private institutions. It’s hard for the public sector to compete when it becomes defunded. There’s no “choice” in that.
Well, let me think Cel… I think I would choose open-air (so open, that there was no definable school, and I would just sit at the movies all day).. with a bit of Montessori and Steiner chucked in for whenever I bothered to go I reckon with Montessori and Steiner, I could get away with not turning up, and still not get belted- hehe.
kay henry
Viewing 20 posts - 401 through 420 (of 2,632 total)