Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 381 through 400 (of 2,632 total)
  • Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    As the others have said, flipping is strategy that was marketeered a few years ago, by people like Henry Kaye. It was in a very different RE market (a rising market) where people could basically set their own values. It was also in the days hwen OTP properties were considered to be “discount”- as in “you’ll be amazed how much this property is worth when it’s built in 2 years!” That MAY have been the truth during a short period of time, but markets change so rapidly, you would have to have paid a deposit 5 years ago for it to have gained real value. Also, 5 years ago, it wasn’t an oversupplied market, as it is in some areas now.

    Get an independent valuer to see what they think it is worth. You may not be able to sell it for 30k extra on completion. In fact, you may be in a situation, when it is worth 30k LESS than you paid for it on completion- depending on where it is and what it is. There are some people who bought an apartment in an oversupplied area, with dreams of fabulous riches.. and then had to sell it in a damper market a few years later for 100k less than they paid for it.

    I hate to be a pessimist :o) but would you be able to afford it if this was the case?

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Domo,

    It sounds as if you’re having a bit of analysis paralysis around this renting issue. You’cve asked about relying on PM’s to give you an estimated rental value, and it seems they have all given you the same figure- ten bucks less than you want. PM’s know the market- that’s their industry. As peterp said, forgoing the extra ten bucks a week, is preferable to having your place vacant for a few extra weeks per year.

    In terms of choosing a PM… well, they’re just people trying to do a job like the rest of us- much of a muchness, I reckon. Problems often start when a tenant falls behind in their rent… and that’s a problem with the tenant- NOT the PM. I think PM’s panic when that happens too- but sometimes it’s hard to get blood out of a stone. Sometimes the problems can be with the owner- not the PM. Mutual respect goes a long way.

    What are you basing your extra $10 figure on? You must have developed it somehow. Has your property got any additional features that others don;t have? If it has a LUG or something other properties in the area don’t have, then you could justify it to a tenant. But if you’ds just like an extra $10 rent… then you might have to be a bit more realistic about what the market will pay.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    hobnob- hey :O)

    No mentor here- just an average joe, getting by on wits :)

    I am thinking if you have 25k debt, that’s probably not a huge amount- many people have that kind of debt- like a car debt or something- don’t panic- sounds, from what you’ve written, that you’re doing well in getting it paid off.

    You’ve written that you have no credit rating problem, and it seems as if you’re working. I think you could get a loan from a traditional credit provider. I think you’d be eligible for the FHOG, from what you’ve said, and may have to only save for costs.

    If you want to buy in sydney… I guess you know how expensive it is. I know you are thinking of being a wrappee… but can you afford a premium and higher interest rate on such an expensive home? 20% premium on a 500k home is an extra 100k. I think that would be a last resort.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    richmond, yeah, of course. I guess I was just irked at the thought of Ronulas suggesting that voters just vote a party in or out because of something like tall poppy syndrome.

    Some voters make sure they find out everything they can about areas that are important to them, and know that the vote they make is a considered one.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Well, Ronulas, I am not sure all Australian voters just think somneone is too big for their boots (tall poppy syndrome) and kick them out… I think voters generally look at what they believe or what they want a society to be, and vote for the Party that suits their ideology. If the main (social) issues for Australia might be: health, education, employment, environment, etc etc etc … then one looks at those issues, checks the policies of each party, and votes for the party that suits. I doubt tall poppy syndrome would have anything to do with something as serious as how the country will be organised for the next 4 years.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Wez,

    I’m glad you mentioned that movie. I’ve been wanting to raise something along those lines. The 1980’s was all about showy wealth, for those who had it- the days of Bondy, Skase, Singo.. all of those cigar-puffing, gold-ring wearing fellows. I think the difference in 2004 (and I am getting onto the topic) is that someone (kiyosaki probably- he seems to be the seminar source guy) decided that because the “greed is good” (all $$ for me, none for you) days were over, that they would add in a kind of “spiritual” element to the rich goal. Hence the “give it back” aspect of the new seminars. I still think it’s all about marketing. I think the books say “if you are richer, you can do more from the community”.

    In Australia, the less wealthy give .6% of income to charity, whereas the more wealthy give .4% of charity. Who knows? When the rich read the “give it back” books, then maybe they’ll give back more? Somehow, I don’t think Australia’s richest people are sitting around reading Kiyosaki, however.

    So my point is, there’s a form of new marketing around, I reckon- and people are picking up on that. Now, people say “I MUST be wealthy because then I can be a better person in society and give more and make the world a better place.” It’s an interesting discourse.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    powmow,

    If you buy an IP in NSW, and you sell it for more than 12% (net) profit, then yes, you have to pay an exit duty.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    People can check this out at:

    http://ato.gov.au/individuals/content.asp?doc=/content/42787.htm&page=12#H59

    Depreciator, I wonder if you wouldn’t mind putting up an example of how the “balancing adjustment event” works on an IP.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Dunno now, Cel. I was really looking forward to it, but I might have to go away for a while. I got a scarey phone call this evening and I might have to leave sydney- a friend of mine’s in a big mess and I am trying to do what I can to make sure she’s safe. I may not be here for Steve’s forum :o(

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Are you going to go, Cel?

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    hehe Jaffa… you ask an agent how much a property costs, and he says “how long is a piece of string?” hehe- that’s funny :)

    Maybe he’s doing that negative gearing marketing of “the property will cost you $30 a week (at the highest tax bracket and with depreciation allowances, and based upon a rental of $$ per week).” I doubt he’s suggesting that if you earn 100k, then the property will cost you 500k, but if you earn 20k, it will cost you 100k.

    I reckon he’s doing the “this is how much it will cost you per week if you earn blah blah” thing.

    He’s being a bit weird in not telling you the price for it. What’s he doing? Maybe he’s conducting some dutch auction. But that would be rare on a new property.

    kay henry

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Thanks Cel for providing that info :o)) I think sometimes we can be bound by what we experience ourselves- thank you for the euro perspective. I know for myself, I can be a bit insular, and it’s good to see models from other countries.

    I also know that growing up in this culture, we’ve not often seen what other countries do, as particularly relevant. We have been happy to pick up on economic rationalist examples from Thatcher and Reagan, but not so happy to pick up best practice examples from progressive euro countries- it’s a real pity, I think.

    As an aside, when I was doing my teaching degree, Montessori and Steiner methods were considered top notch. Unfortunately, we spent more time learning about classroom management, than we did on investigating alternatives to “vanilla” teaching.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Jaffa,

    Sometimes I just go on a $$ amount, rather than yield. For example, I know of a house that was sold for 26k recently. It wouldn’t be hard to get a 20% yield on it – but that’s only about $100 a week. It would be eaten up by repairs, PM costs (it’s remote), and other costs, so for me, it wouldn’t be worth. Actually, it might only yield $60 a week- that’s a 10% yield, but why would one have the stress of that when one still has to pay off the asset and then do repairs and pay costs? I think the money would be better off in ING personally.

    One of my properties has a 9% yield and gets 3 times less than another of my properties with a 6% yield. When i look at the $$ amount coming in, I can’t help but think I am doing better with the poorer yielder, although that’s obviously not the case :)))

    Really though, I’d rather the cash coming in on my 6% yielder, than have the rural property I first mentioned. Yield is not everything. I may lose money on the 6%’er… and it’s possible I may gain a buck or two on the rural house (it would literally be a buck or two @ 10% yield), but I know which property makes me feel safer.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    hehe, yes aussierogues, I remember that one… but i am thinking that surely my laughing at YOUR joke, can’t put me in trouble?

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Oops- what did I say about tasmanians? I think they’re cute- hehe :)

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    terry,

    I really think it’s a matter of a person not feeling they have enough knowledge in the area, and i think it’s commendable that they didn’t take on the work. I have had solicitors from my state not wish to do interstate work because they feel that a person from the other state would be better equipped to assist me. I could see the same happening if a solicitor felt they couldn’t assist with a commercial RE deal or something- I think it’s better if they don’t touch it unless they feel competent in the area. It’s often the best people who know their limitations, and refer someone on to someone who’s a specialist.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Karen,

    My first two properties had rents which paid for the mortgage, but my partner and I had a very high deposit and two incomes. We tried to pay them off as quickly as possible, so we chucked the rents, plus every spare cent we had into them. Those were in the Jan Somers book days, before I had heard of CF properties. The rents we charged were cheap, and we weren’t focussed on yield. Those properties were pre-boom.

    These days, I don’t have CF properties (westan does but he’ll tell ya about it) :O) I don’t do wraps and never will. I am pretty much a tortoise in the RE game, and I work, so I don’t rely on the income of it. Actually, i have no income from it- just a few mortgages which will take me 20-odd years to pay for :)

    Steve’s new tips? Well, he’s bringing out a new book, but I think that will focus on case studies of the MAP folks, and will be discussing his past strategies. I think we’ll have to wait for his 3rd book, or attend one of his seminars (he’s having one in sydney late October, I think) to find out what he’s thinking. Or ask him on here and get the free tips :)

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Ahhh- good on you Stuart :O) Deadlines are not really my forte.

    Anyway, I should duck my head out of this thread. The only way I am even qualified to be in here is because I am “broker” than you are.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    That is VERY funny, emcdonald :o)))) hehe.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    westan,

    Get your hands on the article if you can- it’s a good one. It has some very contrary beliefs about CF+ to this forum. For a start, it says cashflow positive can be achieved on about 6% yield. I can’t remember the formula they use (i’ll look it up later) but it’s interesting to read different ways of thinking about the same issues.

    When he was talking about 20% returns, he was speaking about places where there was unlikely to be any growth. Really, in the next few years, I think growth is unlikely to occur to a significant extent in many markets… so he was saying to compensate for zero growth, he would only accept 20% returns. Yeah, I reckon that would be difficult to find too. It seems a bit like robbing people.

    kay henry

Viewing 20 posts - 381 through 400 (of 2,632 total)