Some of the companies you’ve mentioned- including freeman Foix and ESC, are also selling their own products- property, inter alia. Therefore, it is unlikely that the information is objective…
I guess you’d want to be involved with something that is about YOU, rather than about you being a conduit via which to sell products.
Perhaps you can find a “life coach” who specialises in finance. This person would, of course, need to be licenced to give financial advice… or if you just want more of a “friend”, then it doesn’t matter if they give you financial advice or not- they can just assist with a “can do” attitude.
hehe Joe @ “Hope this makes you feel better, because now that I relived it all for you I feel rotten.” Yer funny
Chefspop, it’s a good point Joe made… in a few years time, you might be back on the Forum telling us what incredible capital gains you got. RE is a waiting game… not everyone makes their fortune in 5 minutes. Maybe you just have to wait it out.
Shouldn’t that have been $1000 a week to make it positively geared? Or do you mean a positive cashflow for return over interest rate costs only? I see the return you’ve stated as 7.2% (which is still good) :o)
I would imagine that the pressure some parents put on their kids to perform academically also contributes to the suicide rate of teenagers in Australia. I have a friend whose parents thought academia was the most important thing in the world. Her sister hung herself a few days after her 17th birthday- due to the academic pressures. I am sure a little less focus on her doing what her parents wanted, may have kept her alive, and may have prevented her sister finding her in the house.
Let’s put this stuff in perspective. School and study is only a part of life. Young people being happy and being able to find their own way, even if it isn’t their parents’ way, cannot be underestimated.
I think Steve has bought some properties in NZ. He’s also putting out a new book, and if it sells as well as his last book did, he’ll probably never have to lift a finger to do anything again.
As for me, I’m a novice I am working and paying back my mortgages RE can be a slow game, and sometimes, it’s about the boring part of just paying off properties.
I saw your name on the list and wonder if you might answer. I’ve posted on here a few times before, an article that details which Banks loan and the LVR for different suburbs.
I am interested that Banks are now “refusing” to lend in areas of sydney… Please let the Forum know which Banks and which suburbs so that this can be verified.
Well, that kind of micro-economic reform from banks will certainly stop over-supply- hehe. No borrowing = no demand.
Yorker, which banks are not lending to which suburbs? Come on, be specific. I know LVR’s are 70% for a bunch of inner suburbs… but refusing to lend? Put your policy where your mouth is, Yorker
I guess some people will be borrowing direct from Triguboff, although he is slowing down building as well. Actually, I saw some apartment yesterday- 2.25% finance- pfft- homeymoon period, I guess. I’ll have to check out details properly.
With industrial trends such as outsourcing, people can work anywhere… so maybe some sydney or more global markets are getting workers from other countries to do the work more cheaply. That’s a global trend, but it will certainly have an influence on immigration.
As far as say, the International student market- well, that is growing (the local undergraduate market is shrinking). But now, with ever-increasing fees and less government funding to Universities, the Institutions are looking to other markets- the offshore educational market is a huge growth area. Thus, Universities are taking the market to International students. It’s possible that this trend will mean that IS’s choose to stay in their home country in the future- and get Australian university qualifications, and not have the expense of living in sydney.
Also, as Salt says… it’s so expensive to buy a house in Sydney- that HAS to have some effect on immigration. Still, 35,000 new residents in the city isn’t too bad. It’s not a ghost town yet
I made a post on this called “Salt on Sydney” earlier- here’s the link to the article:
Bernard Salt, one of Australia’s leading demographers, comments on Sydney. It’s a very interesting article, I think, about immigration, housing affordability etc.
It’s a discussion, Rod- not an argument :+P hehe- I don’t do arguments.
Rod, yes, there are creative ways to do deals- it’s why I referred to residential property in 2004 in Australia- I was thinking about “vanilla” buy and holds.
I still look at property as a piece of equipment, really. If one was buying, for example, a truck, to carry stuff in… the truck might not be positively geared, but it is the owner’s plan to one day pay it off- to reap the reards later. That’s my approach too- I am not into the one-minute millionaire mindset. I’d be happy to just own some property when I’m old. for others, they have different desires or needs.
Rod, one day my properties will put money in my pocket too- just not now they don’t. I’m happy to invest for my future, and forego the cash now. I still see property as a solid investment- whatever method one chooses to purchase it.
Yes, it would be great if some properties got 10%… but not all of them do. So I sacrifice some cash in hand, because I want to buy specific kinds of properties. It isn’t all about the $20 in my hand today- I have a long-term approach.
In Australia in 2004, positively geared residential properties are fewer in number, and often in remote areas. I’d prefer to buy in areas of greater population, basically. I don’t rely on the income of properties to live on, and I make choices about where to buy- and location and population are two of the factors I make my choices on.
We delete ads, Henry, as per policy of the Forum. If people don’t want posts to be edited, then perhaps they shouldn’t advertise properties they have an interest in- simple.. because I wonder how many times people have to be told before they decide to stop posting their ads.
I think a lot of people are still cashing in on CG’s left over from the boom. If there is a large volume of sales (as opposed to “for sales”) then obviously there is demand in that area- demand is always a good indicator for purchase decisions. Hopefully, demand will outweigh supply, and then your property will at leeast maintain value.
Sometimes I like suburbs that have very few properties for sale, and where there has been hardly any new building over the last number of years. There are still some gorgeous suburbs in Sydney that have not been tarnished with the Meriton brush.
Brenda, yep, properties can go down in value, too. I think people tend to hold onto a figure of how much properties have risen- even when times change. So a bank valuation on a sydney property- last done in June 2003, will probably look quite different if people get one done now. Or in fact, the REAL market value of a property is what it sells for. Many properties are now sitting on the market for longer, and no doubt, vendors are holding on to old values, and some will have to be more “realistic” to sell.
chefspop, it isn’t surprising that your property went down 10%- it’s a changed market for many properties. I think even the marketeers have now changed their approach- they realise it is useless to say to people “when built, this property will have gone up by blah %”- because they know it isn’t true- actually, they know that people won’t believe it.
It seems there are a few disgruntled Central Equity people on the forum- or at least one- hehe
kay henry
Viewing 20 posts - 321 through 340 (of 2,632 total)