Jo, thanks for your welcome to the Forum- I hope it’s nice in here :+P
Yeah, well I hope someone who actually *watched* the program found it offensive, as opposed to someonew who didn’t like seeing the word “fat”. The program was in no way discriminatory to big women- anyone who knows me, would know my perspectives on that. It was actually a program on men who fed their women upo so much, that they almost died- these men are called “feeders”.
It was such an interesting program, and it came on again- I’ve seen it before, that I thought I’d let people know it was on. It was on at SBS at 10pm- hardly a controversial time slot
I am sure the Mod who removed it will tell me why they did so. I am interested in what was found offensive and why.
A lemming is an animal. Basically, people use the term as an insult for follower. Gee Yorker- you ain’t a lemming for buying CF+ properties, are ya? :+P
From dictionary.com:
lem·ming ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lmng) n.
Any of various small, thickset rodents, especially of the genus Lemmus, inhabiting northern regions and known for periodic mass migrations that sometimes end in drowning.
Jo, you can look up any words on dictionary.com- takes shorter time than posting asking what it means.
Perhaps the lesson in this- and Ausprop just said it- is to keep the dogs… because in a few years time, they may become Best in Show )
Really, if people sell at a loss- a 10% loss on a 600k unit in docklands, for example + costs (could be around 70k), then they have made a loss. Sometimes it’s better to keep it and make a profit later.
Steve McKnight the other evening, at his launch, referred to CoCR, and discussed market value as it relates to what you can do with that other money. So he was saying that you can work out your returns,m but to imagine the equity in the deal- and how you can make further returns on it. So you might be getting a 10% return on the 50k property, but if the property is now worth 100k, then there is 50k you could be making another 10% on.
In fact, Yorker, Steve made a comment at his launch the other night, that he had made far more money from capital gains, than from cashflow.
We can’t all buy 10%’ers, Yorker. Some of us wish to buy lifestyle places etc, and the rents are not 10%… hence, they are negative geared.
I find it weird when people refer to people who buy neg geared properties as stupid, or “lemmings”… Who would have regretted buying a property in sydney 10 years ago and making so much money? How could that have been stupid or lemming-like?
Brett, what are you actually looking for? Sydney property ranges vastly in price, as you’d know.
Basically, if you buy cheaper properties- like out west, you’ll save some money on the price, but the rental amount can often be absolutely hopeless. Sydney is huge, and it all depends on your budget.
Basically, you have the eastern suburbs, which are old money/establishment, expensive prices, and not overly developed.
Northern suburbs- expensive, not overly developed (except for places like north sydney and chatswood)
Western suburbs- cheaper and miles from nowhere
South- suburban, overdeveloped in places like rockdale, working class in places like Hurstville, Sutherland, Engadine etc etc.
Then you have places like the south-west- still miles from the city, and massive crime- gang-related etc… scarey.
There are a million suburbs in sydney- why don’t you pick a few out and ask, so that people can know what you have in mind?
The seminar thing will also depend on who you’re targeting. Some of what you’ve said in your posts are what other investors take for granted. But new people might find that info informative. If you’re looking t people who are already investing, they need to be able to know that you know more than hey do- otherwise, why would they attend? If, for example, you did a seminar on whyt RE is a good investment… well, we know that, but it would, again, be interesting info for those who are not yet investing, to hear.
How much will you charge?
I would be interested to attend a seminar where the info wasn’t being covered by others, the media, or in books. For example, if I want to know about sydney demographics (Bernard Salt provides all this info), I can find out about it on google news or a range of other sources. What can you provide that gives insights into other areas? What’s your specialist knowledge/nich area?
I would be happy to go to a seminar that spoke about a particular area… for example, if you ran a seminar on why the inner western suburbs of sydney will outperform other suburbs over the next ten years (as an example) then I’d be happy to hear that info- because it’s novel, and it isn’t already being said around the traps.
If people do seminars and tell us how much money they made in the past decade- and that’s why it’s good to invest in the next two.. well, unless people are taking into account current conditions, would find that awaste of time. Anyone who invested in the past made money- but now we are looking forward to the future. What do you have to say about the future of property? Some stuff we can’t find out from Residex or the other sources.
And if you are gonna do seminars, keep your info current. All that data about “only 5% of investors own 2 properties or more” and “90% of Australians retire in poverty on the pension”… [hmm] that data is really old, and does not reflect the current position of the population. Up-to-date info, and info that is not easily accessible off the net, is what I’d be looking for.
As for me, I wouldn’t care if you had 400 properties, or one or none. If I listen to someone, I care not about what they have, but about what they have to say. also, a seminar presenter can lie about how much property they have- they can say, “I made $4 million last year from property.” Well, maybe they did and maybe they didn’t… but it’s what they have to say in their presentation that gives them credibility, from where I’m sitting.
Derek, I think flatter IR’s and flatter prices is the ideal combo. Like 1997- affordable prices and affordable repayments. I think the thing about buying when IR’s are low, is that you pay back as much as you can before IR’s rise.
I don’t like buying on foreclosure conditions. I’d rather buy in bearish conditions, but not when people are really hurting.
I’ve heard about this as a shares strategy- using the curves to purchase and sell… but for property? I think it would be a disaster to buy when IR’s reach their peak. Imagine buying when IR’s are 17%- you’d be likely to end up with negative equity- or, if you were imagining that RE would be out of dashoin if IR’s were so high that you could buy cheaply, then you’d be losing your margins on the cost of repayments.
I think the best time to buy is when IR’s are decreasing or stable. Watch the economy for hints about IR’s. They become more predictable when you check out the macro state of the economy.
Bell’s first book was the 2nd RE book I read- after Somer’s. It was really one of the only books around at the time about RE. Bell’s book was written in 1999, and so it was related to pre-boom conditions really. My mortgage was so small, that the book really resonated with me. But paying a mortgage off in 5 years… she was really talking about cheaper properties- and there were plenty around at the time. Now… well, you buy an expensive property- in a vanilla buy and hold- and it’s hard to pay it off in 5 years.
I wonder if she still ives cheaply. She must have done incredibly well post-boom, but I think people usually live as they live- those who make sacrifices probably always will, because enough never seems enough for them. I wonder if she now has 40 houses and still shops at op shops.
I know I’ll never be wealthy in the sense that others might desire for themselves, but I also know I’ll never feel that I have denied myself enjoyment each day.
“I’ve wondered about laundries… could they be quiet little earners?”
The couple who own my local laundromat work 7am-7pm 7 days a week. I think they would work about 80 hours each week. I would suggest most laundromats don’t just have machines with noone working there- but they do ironing, and a bunch of other stuff.
I get all my clothes etc laundered (I’m not much one for domesticity), and I think the people who work at the launromat deserve every penny they earn. They work their guts out.
Yes, I think we do what makes us feel good, but then again, I’m a hedonist :o)
I worked out last night that I spend an extra 20% of my income- over and above minimum payments- on investments, so I reckon I can spend the rest on what I like. I am hardly going to miss out on the things I enjoy in life, so that I can have a few extra bucks when I’m too old to enjoy them. I’ve never denied myself the things I want.
Some people would call this “wasting money on non-essentials”, but I call it having a life.
I think the thing is, too, that we all spend money on what is important to us. Some spend on home reno’s, others on school fees, others on seminars, whereas my income is disposable with no commitments.
Anit Bell reckoned to drive around in a torana and dress your kids from an op shop, rather than spend one cent on anything other than investments… but I would rather live now, than rely on this unimagineable wealth when one is at retirement age, and then possibly have a stroke so it becomes useless sacrifice anyway.
LMI is basically like an entry duty (like an exit duty). I wouldn’t use it, but if you do, I would only use it for a property that appears to have potential for CG. If you’re paying 2% LMI, then that’s an extra 4k onto a 200k property. You’d want to have the opportunity to recoup that money in the deal. I don’t think LMI is suitable for vanilla buy and hold CF+ deals- it would take too long to get that $$ back. I would be factoring the LMI cost into any exit strategy.
I don’t think it’s silly at all. I think we make money to do what we want to do- like have a better life. And if a fishing boat is what you want, then I think you’re “successful” because you’ve used RE to get what you want.
I get my yield based upon purchase (cost) price. It’s not hard to find properties with this sort of yield. I wouldn’t use market value or possible resale price in any of my calculations, and I don’t use CoCR- I find that an artificial method.
Interesting article, Derek. The last seriously abusive guy who behaved like that in here, did get banned, but he sure caused a bit of grief during his stay.
kay henry
Viewing 20 posts - 221 through 240 (of 2,632 total)