Well, seems it started about *being* a millioniare… then the focus changed to “controlling” 1 million bucks worth of property, which, as another forum member said so eloquently once, would be investing in 2 sydney properties.
I think the question is how much equity people in the MAP program end up having. That’s reallt the meausre of wealth.
I get the feeling that the current affairs shows don’t really want to sit down with joe blow and hear his/her ideas on why it’s good to invest in RE- I am not quite sure where the “story” is in that.
Mini- ring them up and tell them your own tale of CG and CF+ and they’ll probably be interested. But general discussions on why we might put money into property and not a term deposit- sheesh, the audience would be sleeping.
Those shows want stories about *events* that occurring. If you are a property investor *and* you have a cochlear implant, you’ll probably get on there for sure! :o))
kay henry
no PG- my accountant’s name is brian rees- and i think he’s great :o) He has a big long ponytail and looks like a biker- made me feel totally at ease the first time i met him- finances are not the only thing in my life- i also need to like and respect the people i’m dealing with :o) My formula is “ability + relationship”. If one of the two isn’t there, i move on.
That story you told about buying your wife a sex toy because she’s been doing all the bookkeeping- it’s verrry funny, PG- hysterical really :o) Is the husband so busy with all his properties that he gives his wife a sex toy to play with instead? It’s the funniest thing I’ve heard all day!!
Thanks for the accountant dude’e details! This is- an accountant is not like revealing the details of a CF+ IP. Noone is gonna steal him from you. A good accountant is like a good QS or a good solicitor.
I bet if people tell Tony they were recommended by you sis, then Tony will probably give you a big discount on your bill this year! win/win situation for you both :o)
I hadn’t read previously about your father- it’s a sad story :o(
I agree with you about living well today. I remember those old wive’s tales about these old men living a pauper, but after they died, they were found to be a property millionaire! But after having spent so much time on here, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the way people live- no luxuries, no non tax-deductible holidays… deferring any sign of pleasurable living until the magical wealth comes upon us! Retire early, but until then, no life for decades!
Give me pleasure now, because who knows what tomorrow may bring? And why not have pleasure now anyway? We ain’t living in the depression!
Thanks for the recommendation of accountants- i believe i have an exceppent one in wollongong too- but I guess I’ll find out this year- this is gonna be the “year of kay henry” in tax terms, I hope :o)
I have no doubt that accountants would be stoked if they were recommended- more business for them! What better gift would we give them than making more business for them? Would they prefer a bottle of wine as a gift? Or would they prefer 10 more IP customers giving them their business?
By the way, if i gave my accountant a sex toy as a gift, don’t you think he might get the wrong idea???
“Is this book for anyone, or only for those that are prepared to live an extremely frugal lifestyle for as long as it takes.”
Rancid, funnily enough, I got asked about this question by my mother recently. I told her I had had some drinks with some property investors and she said they must be rich with that amount of properties. I told her I don’t know many IP investors who live “richly” as we’re all concerned with paying mortgages etc.
I know it;s not relevant to your overall points, but I’m wondering if anyone of you investors lives really well- “richly” if you will.
Or do we just take our tax deductible holidays to rockhampton and spend our time looking in RE windows, never buy any clothes, and never buy luxuries…
Are our holidays in rockhampton? or the hamptons? Or are we waiting until we are 60 to start living well? and then, the gold which we will hang upon our proud and successful bodies, will shine and flash in the sun…
Basically, with a lot of the stories they do on the current affairs programs, people write or ring in to tell them a story. It’s not like the program just runs all over australia snooping into people’s homes to find something controversial going on.
So if i have a RE story- ripped off by a guru, tenant gone feral, or a new secret RE hideaway… I can just contact the program, and if they think it is interesting enough, they’ll put it on air.
I don’t think they have some secret agenda to condition us and make us into some ACA cult members.
ok sis, as the person who started all of this, I’ve had a look at what’s happened…
Basically, the questions were asked about tax and hecs, to which people put forward their opinions. It doesn’t matter whether people believe in the payment of hecs as a responsibility (I say flick HECS- we should be educated publicly- but that’s easy for me to say- i went to uni when it was free).
As the discussion moved on, and the mechanics of reducing taxable income was discussed, the discussion became more focussed on deductions, and the legalities or suitability of such.
Whilst the topic has been what some might call “heated” or perhaps personalised, I see it more as “vigorous”. Sis, you’ve had lots of people being very encouraging. I think in you encouraging people to go to a good accountant, they have asked for the identity of your accountant. Whether you choose to reveal that or not is up to you.
The list you’ve provided includes things like “political dues”. That is an american term, and the list is obviously american- i am not sure our claimability is equal to that of the american tax system.
Really sis, if we participate in discussion- and I did ask you to initially :o) then we expect what we say to be critiqued. Asking someone for their accountant’s name is probably a fairly usual thing to ask- if we all have a similar goal of having such a professional assist us. But of course, you’re entitled to not provide that
Having looked back at each post, I am not sure if this one *is* out of control- believe me, i’ve had worse :o) I have no idea how many members were privating you and telling you not to engage, but we’re all in this together, and if something doesn’t make sense to us, it’s logical that we query it- sometimes vehemently. Anyway, sis- you’re an adult- you can make your own decisions as to what level you want to engage- all these people privating you and telling you not to respond- what is that? You can do as you wish
It’s all about engaging in the discussion- attacking the ideas put forward- not the person. Hope you haven;t feel too attacked sis- in my reading of the post, you’ve had a lot of support too.
I would still like to get properties under 100K- preferably under 80K- that’s my comfort/risk level. I am into buying units, but i don’t wanna buy places that are built pre-1980- it’s buying into trouble, in my opinion. So I’m pretty limited in what I can buy now.
As for CF+ properties, well, I can see the benefits, obviously :o) But at the end of the day, I still look for “value” and CF+ doesn’t necessarily fit there. I also look at pop’n growth, property maintenance (the lower amount of capital the better), age of the building, location etc. I’m happy with 6% return- and anything more is a bonus- that’s just me.
I like the “sleep flow positive” measurement.
Now, if I had millions to throw around… I would definitely buy up in good parts of sydney, or coastal cities- like my old fave, wollongong- except it just blew up :o((
Or I’d buy unique properties- golf course apartments, churches :o) Anything that didn’t scream “generic”.
For those interested in the philosophical approach of Sugars, he is the guy who is into “death, drought, divorce, desperation” as part of his philosophy on how to buy undervalued properties. A quick google search provides the following links:
Elves, you would have course been invited for a drink :o) Anything I go to is an open affair- not a private thing.
Elves- those fellows- sis and Chan and PG, and Pisces too, I believe- do have get togethers – meetings- to discuss property, and I think they have them regularly ) Why not private sis and ask him when they’re meeting again- he’s a very helpful guy
“We have seen the inner city unit market cop a hiding lately, but blind freddy could have seen that coming. I just wonder will it reach out and hit harder than most of us think ??”
Fatboy- it’s interesting about innercity pads… on the one hand, we are told not to buy into them and the banks are reflecting this by having higher deposits/LVR required… and on the other hand, it really has been a rule of thumb to buy only 6-10 km radius from the major cities.
I personally think the inner-city market will hold up, particularly for established or gentrified areas. As for the newer areas- docklands etc in melby, well, i kind of think the reps of those places have been wrecked to a degree. The properties were probably too exxy anyway, and therefore unsustainable.
But who wouldn’t want to have a (decently priced) IP in sydney in the next few years as immigration (even if temporary or “visitor”) is so secure (international student market etc).
I still have a feeling the innercity- up to 10km’s around the city- will be exceptional investments- in terms of CG if not return got the next up cycle.
I take that as a no. [] o fozzy bear for you, my friend!
Re this “action” thing. We;ll, some of us can;t afford to buy an IP every pay day. You can’t expect people to run off and spend 100k every day! You godda be patient. There are probably 10,000 people on here who are gonna buy a property tomorrow… but there are another 10,000 who might have to wait a few months to do so.
I remember a post on here a few months ago which asked were people gonna buy an IP in the next few months… there were a bunch of people who were deriding others for considering investing, and telling them to hold off for 1 year until the “bloodletting” occurred.
One is either a fool to buy or a fool to wait… or a hero to buy or a hero to wait. Everyone is at their own stage, elves- be patient :o)
Guess I’ll have to entertain sis, PG and Chan with my fozzy impersonation when (and if) they have a drink with me again []
Celivia- in relatoin to your other Q about the prop value being less than the purchase price… my information is that vals depend on LVR. If your LVR/equity is reasonable, i don’t think the banks even require a valuation.
Bank valuers work on markets too- thew valuation will come back with comments about the location being a “rising market” etc. That report should save the purchaser from the bank forcing a revaluation due to “negative equity” fears.
Many of the coy’s that give valuations differ in their estimates. domain.com.au gives val’s as does PI mag, and many other places- they differ widely. I guess only the valuer-general’s office has the “true” data. Dunno if that’s residex’s source or not.
I am with Simon- “market value”. Past sales do not indicate future values, I reckon. If you don;t want to pay the price, you might be missing out on something you want. The person who paid the higher price might be considered a “fool” but that fool has the property, and has paid the price for a reason.
You can offer basement prices because of a property report, but the market will always determine the *sale* price, which may differ wildly from the offer you’ve made.
It all comes down to what you want. If you want the property, ya godda pay for it :o) Perhaps the buyer did get ripped off, but if people pay prices like the new purchaser paid, within about 3 more sales, the price will have risen to that anyway.
Look at the sydney market- noone really knew what their property was worth- the market was going wild.
Perhaps the pother thing is that we’re still on a rise in RE in some areas. Whilst there’s been stories of props getting cheaper, i guess your experience, Celivia, is that the market in that area is still rising.