Forum Replies Created
Sorry for your situation, there was a post on another thread where an investor just bought in Rochester NY. I fear the same will happen to him.
When you invest in a city or town in the US and the neighborhood turns or in the case of upstate New York where the market has turned years ago, unfortunately you have little to no options. The only people investing in these markets by and large are foriegners because they do not know any better and in the case of this Rochester investor he was lured in with promises of some huge return, that is just not sustainable over time. and more than likely in 5 years will loose most if not all of there investment.
I am sure you were promised some huge return by the folks that sold you the property, The whole reason I post my opposing view point is to warn people of the HUGE RISK there is in US rentals if you do not buy the right properties in the right areas.
ITs all a risk even the areas I invest in. But there are areas that its obvious to a US citizen and investor to avoid, and unfortunately you picked one of those and Rochester is the same along with Detroit, Fort Wayne, Toledo, Most of Cleveland etc etc. its the upper rust belt, these towns are going through a metamorphosis where they have peaked and they are sliding down, in the next 20 years fully 20 to 30% of the exisitng houses will be demolished as there are vast areas of empty houses.
Wish I could give you better advice but for now I think your best bet is to walk away. Do not put another dime into the houses no one can come after you for back tax's just let the state take the house.
JLH
condev wrote:Hi Jayhinricks,
You have to put it into perspective. We were thinking of building a $20,000 shed but instead bought a $20,000 house with a net return of $6000pa. It will be debt free after 3 years vs a car?I have now sold my investment property in Australia and will pay off some debt, and then invest $200,000 and aim for a net $70-80,000 pa net return.
Now while I understnd the risk of putting all my eggs in one basket, they were in one (possibly overvalued) basket in Australia before.
kind regards
GeorgeDream on , ( and I do not mean to be rude) if one could make that kind of return the whole of the US would be weathly beyond dreams and Oz investors would never get a deal. Do you really think if you could make that kind of return that the US investor would not own every property avaliable. These are just not realistic or sustainable only in a sales brochure and in your wants and wishes.
condev wrote:Hi All,
I have just bought two properties in Rochester NY, without visiting the USA. My agent took heaps of photo's and Skype, building inspections and title insurance I now net a 30% reutrn.(yes net of taxes(rates)maintenance and fees). I did not officially finance them, I just put it on the mortgage. Total investment USA $42000, which converted to A$40,500.
YES, I have been paid for two quarters of net returnkind regards
Georgesounds great please report back after you have had a few years under your belt your in the honeymoon period.
Rochester passed city ordinance against selling certain properties to foreigners because there was a firm in GB totally ripping people off.
even if you do not get 30% and you get 10% returns once you have a few years of true expense's thats still a great return. will you ever sell the properties for more than you paid for them, Doubtful. remember who ever sold them to you made some sort of profit probably 10k per house minimum and probably more.
there is no way after 6 months of ownership where you can establish your true returns. experinced investors always look at 24 months of P and L .
Best
JLH
DetroitDan9 wrote:Shoot me an email and I will send you an example. Cold weather is not a factor for vacancy – it is standard up here. Not sure how you factor that into it. Also being stuck with a water bill means you probably made a bad purchase or placed a bad tenant, either of which is not a reflection of Detroit, but whoever was running your property. It sounds like you are just trying to push your product over Detroit, which is fine – but just make sure you are informed when you make such statements, instead of blindly slamming the City of Detroit.Just real world experiences after doing some 250 loans in Detroit and foreclosing on 8 or 10 properties and ending up owning them, As a lender we definitely get the worse end of the stick when borrower walks. We got out of most of ours because we stopped lending there in 07. Before the big melt down and the credit crisis.
I think the stats stand on their own about Detroit there is huge negative population growth, unemployment, of which a good section of the unemployment are those that are terminally unemployed which does skew the numbers up ward.
In its day I liked it enough to do hundreds of loans so there was a day that we enjoyed it, that day has passed, as well as most big inner cities, Same thing with Chicago, Pittsburg, Philly, Fort Wayne, Cleveland.
The outlying suburbs are, as you say more stable and there is I am sure decent returns. Just hard pressed to see how your going to have price's come up substantially unless the Aussies or Brits create a shortage and drive up prices. Because it sure is not going to happen from US investors. US investor's still go into Detroit only for the price point. buying houses for 1 to 5k.
and trying to keep them rented and repaired. their price point it so low they risk the other factors, and if you get a bunch of them like you probably have you make a business out of it.My point is that it can be very iffy for a out of state or foreign investor to Make ANY purchase in the US, and only have 1 or 2 properties. Even in good areas or areas we think are good there is going to be management issues.
And because these houses by and large are REO and usually vacant when they are purchased, Folks are buying these all on proforma financial data prepared by the person who is trying to sell it and is trying to make as much profit on the front end as possible, hey thats capitalizm and the american way.
When ever I buy or sell Plex's for instance and those are almost always to experinced investors, people tend to buy single family then move up to multi. First thing they request is 2 years of tax returns and P and L's with actual expenses. And then run the numbers to figure out a cap rate that they are comfortable with then fashion there offer to purchase accordingly.
Whats happening here in the single family Niche is investors are buying properties that have no historical data as to that specfic property. so there is no way to know for certain what you can expect in vacancy factor and on going Maintance.
My comments about cold weather are that houses by and large will cost you more to maintain in a cold weather environment.
Also as such one needs to be careful what they buy if a house is poorly insutlated and has abnormally high UTL bills the tenants will not stay long. Thats why I would not buy a rental in cold weather area that is much bigger than 1500 sq ft. You buy a 2k sq ft home or bigger sounds great but expensive!!! to heat and cool. And tenants are on fixed budgets by and large so those are little things one needs to be aware of.speedy gonzales wrote:Hey Russ,a) You can raise cash through the equity in your own home here in Australia and effectively then become a cash buyer in the US. An Australian bank is not able to lend you funds using a US property as security
OR
b) raise cash through the equity in your own home here in Australia to use as a deposit and get the rest of the funding from a US source.Issues…
- most people on the forum will tell you the difficulty in getting finance from US banks/lenders due to the lack of funding available.
- only a few banks operate nationally in the USA (Eg Bank of America, Citibank etc) and none of these have lending programmes that allow lending to a foreign national (which is what you are called) since the GFC.
- need to use lenders that will lend in your state of purchase or in the geographical area you invest in
- issues involved getting funding for homes in foreclosure. Homes need to be liveable condition at the time of approval with no maintenance issues or structural issues allowed.
- can use what are called "hard money lenders" but rates tend to be quite high (above 12%) and for short loan terms which can effect projected cashflow and as the name suggests…these people don't muck around.
I purchased a home last October and fortunately it was relatively easy for me to get funding for 70% of the price paid. Loan in the name of my LLC over a 20 year term. I am heading to DFW this weekend to purchase some more homes and have finance pre-arranged for at least 50%….hoping to get this up to at least 65% and will be over a 30 year term. Very few have been able to achieve this and NO….I have not used a buyers agent in Australia
The above method of buying US property, for the average investor in my Mind I Fraught with peril. Your banking on your house renting and everything going perfect, what happens when your house does not bring in cash flow.
This kind of leveraging up caused the current crisis to a certain extent. If I could give any advice to our aussie friends.
It would be this if you do not have enough money to pay cash for a rental without mortaging your house then you have no business buying in the states. and anyone who encourages this is out to just make money on you and does not care about your long term success.
However if your bound and determined to borrow against your house then be darn sure where you invest. And be very carefull of texas with its property tax its a huge burden, I was on the phone today with an LA investor that had 3o rentals there and lost his but because of prop taxes/
And being a hard money lender of prominace in the states the above statements of hardmoney loans for 20 year terms are purly bull crap. he may be thinking of something else but hardmoney loans are one yare 20% apr type loans I know I lent millions this way.
best
I think as you read the above posts and as smart as the aussie investor is. once you factor in vacancy factor, as in it takes 1 to 5 months to rent a house there is no way these houses return 15% Net returns.
That could pick up as you get tenanted, but what happens when the tenant leaves and its 2k to rehab and you sit vacant another 2 to 3 months.
these are my points, the proformas offered by these companeies that really have no long term history owning US rentals are all just hype and best case scenerio. I would bet anyone here that if you do better than 10% net return your doing fantastic.
Not that that is bad its great but its not 15 to 20 like is bandied about on this site. And especially if you take into consideration your travel over here setting up your LLC 's and such.
One of top rental return clients has been e mailing me. bought in Feb for 94k. took 2 months to do a 2 week job. Just got rented middle of July the rent that was represented was 1600 it ended up renting at 1400 which is still really good. However the 12.56% net return was based on 100% occupancy which of course it never had and rent at 1600. So this deal will be far south of 10% acutal return. Although I really liked the house looked nice
Perfect 10% in my experince will be on the high end if the investor is not cheating at solitare.
Its just going to take a generation of Au investor buying these and experincing the day to day for a few years and then if any of them will be forth coming and honest to see where returns come out.
YOu can certainly get the perfect property that could return you 15% but after 30 years and 1k or more rentals I can assure you this is not the norm.
spierreyoung wrote:really?to put that into context. You can buy tax liens that never redeem and you just loose your money and the properties are worthless and not worth perfecting title on. Happens every day of the year in this business.
when you go to the sales you wil see who the players are they are all set up with their lap tops and have 3 or 4 people they do it for a business. the average investor is just throwin dice
DetroitDan9 wrote:Jay – 15-20% in SE Michigan is pretty close to average. No puffing here LOL.Dan,
send over your sample proforma lets see what constitues 15%. I am very conservative on my numbers in the detroit market I would use 50 to 60% of gross for expenses. One being cold weather 2 for vacancy. and the oft chance i get stuck with a water bill ( which has happened to me to the tune of 4k) and of course properties tax's can and are a real huge burden there Not to mention turning the houses over every year to 2 years max. We all now how transient these tenants are.. Just like texas. I had a con call today with an investor that owned 30 houses in texas and he could not wait to get ride of them the property tax's ate him alive and he never made a dime in texas.
sapphire101 wrote:You may want to look at established businesses in Detroit that have been buying and selling property during this downturn and know everything there is to know about the city with regard to property returns.An investing strategy in Detroit i have been involved with is Rent To Buy as we call it. There I think it's called land contracts. You purchase the property for x amount – say $30k. A retail buyer ( on a waiting list) then pays you $50k for it using a deposit of x amount – say $10k, reducing your exposure to $25k. They then take over all outgoings, (maybe except insurance – you might want to ensure you have a property safe while the deed is in your name). They also agree to pay you rent or vendor finance payments, whatever you want to call it of x amount. Let's say $800per mth for the next 24, 36, 48 months, whatever you negotiate. At the end of the term they either own the house or pay you a balloon payment after renegotiating with a bank or lending institution.
Ah the old lease to own game with the "I hope they quit paying mantra" I think for long term holds these can be good in general however I have done at least 50 of these over the years and can count on one hand and 2 fingers those who actually could buy.
but they by and large make good tenants. And 10k down I think is puffing most people with 10 k will buy outright not just lease, On reason is so many landlords have scammed and stolen money from Lessors its an epidemic.
Seller gets the 10k down renter pays 800 a month, land lord defaults it takes a year or more for mortgage company to figure it out and foreclose Landlord never makes payments pockets the 800 a month never pays tax's etc. gets the down payment they end up making 20 to 30k , the poor lessee gets a notice their house is going to foreclosure and they get booted after its done and loose everything.
YOu may ask who would do this, Answer many many landlords. That is why in deeds of trust or Mortgages their is an assignment of rents clause. And why the lessor if they go to an attorney will record the lease.
Now if your the seller and they record the lease, its not so easy to get ride of them you need to do a full foreclosure which in Michigan is a pain and 1 year and costly,
most of the guys i know in this bizz do what we call sweat equity they do these lease options and let them move into a house pre rehab for 1k down and really low payments. And some of the tenants actually fix them up some just live in them.
but the reality is 60 to 90% default over a 5 year period.
Hope that sheds some light on the lease to own program
sapphire101 wrote:For $100k you could control 4 properties with no outgoings, no management problems, no vacancies. The local Detroit company handles all the contracts, finds the buyer and collects the monthly income. If they, the retail buyer defaults, then the vendor finance option reverts to a rental contract and they can be evicted in 45 days ( or less). You then sell the option again and get another $10k deposit reducing your initial $25k exposure down to $15kIt's actually better for you as an investor if the retail buyer defaults.
Ian
http://theblockblog.com
Free Property Investment Info, Tools & Resources for Investors with a Sense of Humoursaturday wrote:Hi Jay,what is your view on the Portland realestate market?
what sort of returns would you expect in portland?
how many years away before any capital growth returns?
thanksPortland is typical of the better parts of the west coast. We had a melt down but mainly on the High end IE 2 mil houses went to 1 mil.
You still pay 120 to 200k for a rental that will bring in 900 to 1100 a month.
I have a series of new construction homes that I am into about 250k each and I rent then at 1500 to 1700.
Our market will not rebound like some CA markets will. Lots of buying though, I personally am selling all my rentals here and repositioning to the south east. Cash flow is just so much stronger.
What I am bullish on for our market is new construction and land banking. But new construction is not something the AU investor is probably going to get into, We do not need investors for this and our banks are happy to give us vertical construction loans at 5%. We average about 40 t0 50k per house NET profit. So that allows me to build our South east portfolio.
Everything I new about capital growth over the last 35 years is really just a memory, its anyone's guess as to what is going to happen, So to that end I really think a nice Atlanta house in a good neighborhood for 60k has a better chance of going to 100k in 5 years and will cash flow nicely, than buying a 200k rental here that rents for 1k and may or may not go up.
That all said , Land bank in this area is were the real money is at. because of scarcity of land for builders.
<moderator: delete advertising>
this is were the money is going to be made in the Portland Market or building new houses right now, if you can start a building company like we have. We have 5 subdivisions going and usually about 5 to 8 spec homes going vertical and close 2 to 3 a month.
However if you ever get to this neck of the woods please look us up. and if you e mail me your direct e mail address I will send you over copies of our listings and our new product we are building.
best
JLH
Can you say strategic default.
if it does not effect your perosnal credit this is what most propert owners in our shoes do.
I am not advocating it just pointin out whats happening
Henry Smith wrote:Thanks for sharing this but I want to buy a residential apartment in new york at any place but it should have good appearance and it attracts everyone. What does it cost me?Loaded question residential apartment in New york can go from anywhere from 100k to 100,000,000 k
If you want something i Manhattan its 1 to 5 mil minimum anything under 500k will be a dump really.
Might consider taking the train out an hour or so to Jersey or connecticut to a rural little town and get something 300k and under.
HOpe that helps.
Dan, I have a heck of a time explaining my model of first trust deed ownership with 50% equity, the few folks I have gotten on webinars just could not grasp the concept.
It woudl be intersting to know what the security instrument they use in Au to secure a real estate loan and if they sign a promissroy note
Highly risky,
the locals that have been doing it for years will kill you
biggaz13 wrote:Hi Jayhinrichs
Are you from The True Wholesalers Houses website at:
http://www.truewholesalehouses.com/jayhinrichs.htmlYou had me worried when above you said "..wiped out if your buying 40k an under properies in theUS.."
Maybe its the wrong Jay Hinrichs but at that website above at True Wholesalers there is a house for sale at Jackson:
Jackson, MS
– $17,500 Equity DAY 1 – Cashflow $262/Mo
Note Price $35,000Are you saying not all houses $40,000 and under are bad????
cheers
Gary
gary, the difference is that is what we paid for the property and did a total rehab, and we are bringing our investors in as partners not flipping the house to them. these houses have
1. New roofs
2. new heating a airconditioning ( Brand new from Factory)
3 new sewer line plus all new pecs plumbing.
4 all new electrical includeing the breaker box.
5. new bathroooms
6 new kitchens.
7 new floors and doors and carpets.Other than the bones of the house they are brand new. Completly different than the average rental you will buy from any other company 95% of the time. This house would sell on the rental flip at close to double what we are bringing our clieint into the deal heck we spent almost 30k rehabbing it.
JLH
IMC Newbury wrote:Rosa, My advice, its worth what you paid for it, is don't………………. You got to be absolutely nuts to take a personal loan to buy US property. You will never get enough net return to be even close to an even cash flow. World gone mad… greed rules………………… crazyAs a US investment firm I could not agree 1000% more, those who borrow against their personal residence to buy US properties on their own are going to have at least a 50% mortality rate.
Just ask yourself where are all these foreclosed hosues coming from, 50% from landlords that gave up becasue the expenses far exceeded what was represented and after loosing untold thousands gave up and let the bank have them.
And or stratigic defaults property lost so much value they walked.
The south east is the New detroit , just check it out, all the auto manufactorers are or have moved south. No big union problems.
Largest Nissan plant in the world = Jackson MS —Largest Toyota plant under construction between Memphis and Tuepelo MS home of Elvis and thats saying something, I personally have visted both sites. the Toyota site is something to behold at least 5 miles by 5 miles under construction, Out in the middles of no where but it will create thousands of Jobs.
Alabama and GA have seen there share as well as the Carolina's.
Upper mid west may attrack some new bizznesses but it won't be auto motive.
Detroit has over 50k houses that could be bull dozed under right now. Be very very careful in Mich. Ohio upper IND Like Fort Wayne. there is NO capital Growth there in the foreseable century in my mind. and has not had any since the 60's.
No one knows were the best places to invest are. However those rust belt towns are certainly ones to be very careful with.
If you can get good clean neighborhoods and want your 5 to 10% NET return year in year out they will do that.
Any one preaching 15 to 20% Net returns for year in year out is Puffing big time. You can do that if you buy at the price the folks that are selling you the properties buy at. But by the time the AU gets it the mark ups are 30 to 50% over true cost so there is not near the income potential and certianly no Capital potential.
Its going to take those that dive in to these markets thinking they are going to get this huge return and then loose their money to figure that out
JLH
Oh the heard mentality is alive and well in Lehiegh and fort Meyers.
don't think you can get hurt at 50k a house I bought a few a few years ago.
but remember there are over 750k thats seven Hundred and fifty thousand Platted lots that can be built on in Lehiegh and 300k plus in coral.
Infrastructure will be an issue in the coming years has been for the last 50.
But if you want a home to live in I do not think there is much better buy in the world than these.
with the amount of buildable lots I do not think you will see capital growth like you will in State Captial cities that have far more industry and jobs.
Not to be negative but A boston red sox winter league stadium will have next to zero impact, They only play there 6 weeks out of the year. This is not reason to think your investment is going to sky rocket.
JLH
Ya'll are going to really think I am an know it all now.
Leheigh acres has 750k platted lots or thereabouts Thats 750,000 Thousand. and Coral about 300k.
These subdivisions were built before there were any real zoning rules.
the lots that have Sewer system have more value. other lots have septc and well on each lot.
Nice product. supply and demand dictates here.
I bought 2 foreclosures 24 months ago for 30k each put about 10 into them. then gave them to a local wholesaler who had a local company that dealt with a british firm. The end buyer were brits and they paid about 85k for each. With the British company making about 15k profit on each the local guys about 5k and I made 5k each. About how it goes by the time it hits Britian.
Got to watch for Chinese dry wall as well.
I was on a California government committe back in the mid 80;'s that was dealing with antiquated subdivisions. Which by definition are subs that were platted and recorded. But never had the proper amount of roads sewers water to allow a even close to 100% build out.
Le High and coral were the poster childs for these, I spent a week there in the Mid 80's with the local planning staff. There is no way that the infrastructure can handle even a 50% build out.
so when you go there you will see long blocks with one or 2 houses. then none then a bunch. And someone owns each of those lots in between. Lots have traded there for 3 to 10k per for 50 years. then in the go go times of 2003 till the bust of 07 they got up to 90k, now there back down to 10k and will pretty much stay there.
Houses were 250k then crashed, Actually if you wanted to live there probably one of the best deals in the whole world.
Wholesale prices have risen a little from when I picked my up. but you can still get them for 35 to 45k at trustees sales as is.