I'm not a legal person but I'd assume that they'd have to forfeit the deposit to you if they're unable to proceed with the purchase.
There's heaps of reasons why settlements are delayed – and it's usually due to minor issues that delay it by a few days rather than major issues that stop it from proceeding at all.
It's also the eve of a long weekend, so that could have been a factor.
It's a bit of a pain – HSL/NAB have been good for investors from a servicing point of view due to taking other financial institutions liabilities at their actual repayments rather than inflated repayments based on P&I, a higher rate or a combination of both.
There's some merit behind their decision when it comes to certain mining towns that could be deemed high risk – but then there's also other non riskier areas where yields are high.
2. ok, if rates is not as important, then what is?
Ability to access equity for future purchases is a big one.
What's the point of using a no frills type lender who's going to save you $20 per month on loan repayments but not be willing to allow you to access equity for you next IP purchase? Sure you've saved a few dollars in the short term – but you've also lost the opportunity to purchase your next IP which may cost you more in the long run.
I have lots of clients come to me wanting to purchase an IP but their no frills, on-line lender with the super competitive rate are no longer conducive to their needs.
You need to factor in another 5% to cover purchase costs – these are generally stamp duty, legal fees, building/pest inspection and a few the minor expenses at settlement.
In terms of releasing equity – some lenders will allow you to borrow up to 90% against the properties value.
So if you purchased a $200k property using a 10% deposit ($180k loan), carried out some renovations, had it revalued at $250k – then you could borrow up to 90% of this new value which is $225k. So you take the $225k and subtract the initial loan of $180k and that leaves you with a $45k equity release to cover the deposit/costs on your next purchase.
1. Is it ideal for you? You need to speak with a professional about this before jumping in to a complex structure that may or may not benefit you. If you decide to set up a trust, don't do it online.
2. Don't shop on rate. Rate is one of the less important aspects of a loan for investors.
3. Not quite sure what the question is. MISA is a bit of a pain.
4. Ok.
5. That's a good approach.
6. Ok.
As a general comment, I wouldn't drop $200k into your first deal. This is a lot of money that can be leveraged further. If you're planning on buying a PPOR at some point then I'd definitely avoid using such a cash massive deposit on an IP.
Agree with Derek – IO with an offset provides for optimal flexibility.
The only time I would advise against it is if you're not too good with money and would simply make the minimum interest repayments and blow the additional cash elsewhere.
We only ended up going down this path because it was a hassle finding decent PMs.
It's worked out well for us – and we haven't experienced too many serious issues. Whenever we'd had a problem – we've quickly rectified it, including one visit to the tenancy tribunal.
You do need to be on top of the tenancy laws in your state – and if an issue arises, document everything and follow every process.
Don't worry – at least you're not from Canberra. We get overlooked by everyone and everything – unless you're into flowers (Floriade) or mass bogan gatherings (Summernats)
There's a couple of main things lenders look for – a deposit and the ability to service the liability.
You've got the deposit sorted – but being unemployed (presumably with no income coming in) then you're unable to demonstrate the ability to meet the liability.
When you're back in the workforce, it will be a different story.