There's a group of property investors that meet up at the Civic library once a month – you might get something out of attending. I went once to check it out – seemed ok.
Welcome aboard It's always good to see another Canberran on the forum. We're not related are we???
Have you checked out the ABS for stats on jobs, etc?
With the deposits question – you don't need to come up with 20%
You can still get away with as little as a 5% deposit for IP purchases. Sure it will incur some mortgage insurance, but that doesn't neccesarily have to be a bad thing. It means you can buy more with less and leverage more of the banks money rather than your own. Mortgage insurance is also a deductible expense for IP purchases.
I wrote this article a couple of years ago for Australian Property Investor magazine on leveraging LMI.
As a start, continue to read up and educate yourself about property investing. There's plenty of free/cheap resources out there – including forums like this.
When you move into the IP – technically you won't be able to claim the entire debt against your new IP (previous PPOR) because a portion of the loan was redrawn to fund the deposit/costs on the new PPOR.
Best to seek advice from an accountant – they might be able to apportion debt so you can still claim something.
Jamie and Richard; I wanted to check if i can access equity to buy an IP for ~200K.
Unfortunately; we were completely new when we entered the Oz market and we ended up cross collateralising… So i have to also see how i can Un-cross collateralise(if there is such a word;))
Cheers
Preethy
Don't worry – you're not the first.
I'm always uncrossing loans due to poor structures.
Consider getting someone that has a clue to sort this out for you. Chances are your local branch manager will give you a blank stare.
I wouldn't invest in a property primary to reduce your taxable income – it's a flawed concept. It means you need to spend $1 to get back 40 cents.
Instead, I'd only treat any tax concessions associated with property investment as a bonus – and focus more so on purchasing the right property that fits in with your longer term financial plans.
Are you thinking about renting out your current apartment and purchasing another property to live in? If so – the loans need to be structured correctly to avoid cross collaterisation (something the banks love to do) and also maximise tax effectiveness.
I'd just compare apples with apples. A loan under the b/free package is pretty straight forward – there's a nil app fee and an ongoing annual fee of $375.
Most lenders offering these sort of pro packs have similar fee structures – a nil (or low) app fee followed by an annual fee of around $350 to $395.
Look at a few different options and have your broker explain the pros/cons of each in regards to your circumstances.
it sounds like you're getting caught up too much in thinking about this comparison rate.
The comparison rates gives you a better idea of the true cost of the loan. It factors in the rate, fees, charges, etc.
Sounds like you're not too comfortable in dealing with your current broker. Trust is key – if you don't feel you have it, then perhaps look for another.
Bamboo is very hard wearing, but it hates water, warning!
Yep, that would be the biggest issues with having bamboo in an IP.
We have it in our PPOR – in the kitchen area. Even with being extra careful, it's inevitable that some water hits the floor – and we make sure to dry it up as quickly as possible. Some tenants won't have that same level of caution.
It's a tough question to answer without knowing how your portfolio is actually structured.
When properties aren't crossed – it's generally a matter of getting a valution carried out on a property and if there's sufficient equity, you can access it.
With crossed collaterised properties – you usually have to get the entire portfolio revalued and if there's sufficient equity, you can access it.
There are a few mentorship type service that you pay a fee for.
There's also plenty of free information/resources such as this forum. If you're willing to put in the time/effort to learn – you shouldn't need to spend too much at all.
I would have thought there would be less taxation implications with that approach rather than paying the rent into an IP LOC.
Cheers
Jamie
Why? Rent goes in, bills, interest comes out. I would have thought that was pretty standard. I have a LOC that I use in that way. It stays at pretty much zero all the time. Makes it easier on the accountant if all money goes in and out of one account.
my preference would be for the funds to into an offset against a PPOR – each to their own.
It shouldn't make a difference to the accountant in terms of the work they do – they can look at the end of year loan statement and PM statement to work out income/expenses.
It's important that any money paid into the LoC isn't redrawn for non IP purposes too – you don't have this issue with it going into an offset.
Yeah shouldn't be a problem – I would have thought there would be less taxation implications with that approach rather than paying the rent into an IP LOC.