You're paying for someone elses renovations. How much are similar (non-renovated properties) selling for in the area?
If it has already been renovated, not only will you be paying a premium, you're also buying a property that has little scope for improvement. Wouldn't you prefer to buy something you can add value to?
I think it might be better to get a high LVR loan initially and then put the spare cash in the offset account. This will result in the same interest, (but will cost you LMI). as values grow LMI forked out will become insignificant. It will also keep more cash available for emergencies.
Agree with Terry – also makes it easier to access cash if another deal comes up in the near future.
One thing I should have added is that if you decide to self-manage, make sure the landlord policy you have in place will allow you to do so (some will only cover properties that are being professionally managed).
Self managing is not difficult (when things are going right). You'll need to get up to speed with the tenancy laws in your state. The form you're refering to is a tenancy agreement.
You can still get 95% loans. You'll probably need to have an existing relationship with the lender offering them though. Which banks are you a customer of?
That said though, 95% loans aren't easy to get approved. Personally, I'd be inclined to go for the two IPs with the 10% deposit on each.
I know these may be impossible question to answer, but I'll ask anyway
1 – How much of a set back will this be to my plans to get into IPs? I'm hoping not too much as my raise should cover most of the increase in mortgage? Financially we're doing OK anyway.
A $700k PPOR could end up being a burden in terms of your serviceability down the track. However, if it's the compromise that allows you to get into property investing……A decent broker can run a through scenerios for you, working out what you can afford based on a number of variables.
MRW wrote:
2 – If I'm looking to buy IPs in the foreseeable future would it be best to buy the PPoR in her name, mine, or both?
You have similar incomes. Unless one of you are planning on dramatically reducing your incomes anytime soon (eg. wife leaves the workforce to look after kids) then it shouldn't really matter. I'm not an accountant, so someone else might be able to advise otherwise.
MRW wrote:
3 – Now the biggy. Should we use the equity we have in our current home (approx $200-250,000) toward the new PPoR? Or, assuming the banks would lend us the full cost of the new PPoR, to buy an IP? Or Shares?
I would access some of this money to use as a deposit towards your PPOR loan. Be careful with the bank lending you the full cost of the new PPOR, chances are they'll cross collaterise your old PPOR with your new one. This will cause dramas later on when you want to purchase another IP.
MRW wrote:
4 – I'm not sure how I feel about keeping our current PPoR as an IP as the yards are definitely high maintenance, although it's an option if the consensus points that way. It's not a house I'd pick as an IP though. (Considering my vast experience )
It's your call. You can always have the tenant maintain the yards – or you could supply a gardener once a month.
MRW wrote:
5 – This is a general question, and again probably no definitive answer, but when did you all know you were financially in a position to buy your first IP? If in fact you were? I'm a bit (understatement) of a procrastinator but in this case am determined to jump as soon as is possible.
Financially, I only had a measly $50k in equity to get me started. Mentally, when I realised that working 9 to 5 until I was 70 just wasn't the life for me
I'm in favour of using LMI for the simple reason that you can buy more with less.
Here's a simplistic scenario.
1. If you were looking to purchase a property for $400k, and wanted to avoid paying LMI, you'd need to bring about $100k to the deal ($80k deposit, $15k stamp duty, $1k legal, etc). Just say that this property appreciates by 10% in the first year. In 12 months time, it's worth $440k. Not bad.
2. However, if you were willing to pay LMI, you could purchase two properties valued at $400k. You'd have to take out loans around the 95% LVR mark and the LMI would probably be about $10k for each property (which would be added to the loan).
However, let's assume that these two properties also increase by 10% in the first year. In 12 months time, you have two properties worth $440k each or $880k in total. That's $80k in equity that you've made in the first year. Even when you minus the $20k you've paid on LMI, you're still left with $60k – which is better than scenario 1.
Remember, this is just the first year, imagine if the properties continue to appreciate at this rate. Those two properties will worth a lot more in 5 years time than the 1 property you've avoided paying LMI on.
This is a very simplistic explanation, and I'm in no way speculating that property will increase by 10% per year, but it does show how you can leverage LMI to buy more with less and potentially grow your portfolio quicker.
You should also get your PPOR valued when it becomes an IP. That way, if you end up selling it in the future you shouldn't have any issues with the ATO when working out how much CGT is payable. The CGT will be the sale price of the property minus its value when it became an IP.
A local real estate agent should be able to provide a written appraisal.
If you need something quickly, I use a company where you fill out their online form and attach photos – from that info, they email you the depreciation schedule. Some argue that with this method certain depreciable items may go undetected (because a QS doesn't physically inspect the property). I can email you a discount voucher if it helps.
I've got a good IP analysis spreadsheet that I use for working out yield, holding costs, forecasted growth, estimated tax return, etc. Just email me if you'd like a copy.
Can't you treat it as a private arrangment whereby the students are paying you board to contribute towards living expenses such as bills, food, ect? That way it's unlikely to be treated as income. I'm not an accountant but I'd assume that this kind of arrangement is not uncommon.