No, I wouldn't consider them to be less favourable – it's just that there's only a limited number of them which narrows your scope of future lenders. I wouldn't say it was a deal breaker – it all depends on your long term plans.
If a valuer didn't physically inspect the property then it was either a desktop (RP data, etc) or a kerbside.
I know lot of organisation as well government relies on RP Data but should we take RP Data on face value. Looking at your signature I would like to ask, how can I value my property like a bank?
You can ask the lender/broker to request a full valuation instead (that's assuming your actually lodging an application). Depending on the lender, they might allow the broker/banker order the valuation up-front. If neither of these options are available you could always pay for a full valuation (however, this won't be accepted by the lender and will be for your own info).
Amit Thaker wrote:
That sounds too lenient given tight lending criteria followed by banks at the moment. Your thoughts appreciated.
Why? Valuations cost banks money – if you've got 20% equity in the purchase then there's little risk for them. I wouldn't say lending criteria is overly tight at present – banks are wanting to do business….albeit with the right clients.
The mortgage broker suggested once the property becomes a IP i should change my loan to IO. I understand that there is tax benefits regarding this.
Hiya
Not good advice.
The loan should be set up as interest only with an offset now. Instead of paying down the principle – place the would be principle repayments into your offset account. This way, you're not paying down the principle (which is future deductible debt) but you're achieving the same outcome.
I wrote an article for Australian Property Investor magazine on this topic here.
A good broker is personable, has a sound understanding of lender policy/procedures, a good working relationship with lenders, loan structuring, good attention to detail, honest, ethical and efficient. In my mind, it's something that's not provided in a course – it's experience coupled with personal attitudes/attributes.
I've heard that if you go 50/50 that when you go for a loan down the track for another property the banks will take 50% of the income but 100% of the loan repayments when calculating your borrowing capacity (i.e. they assume the other partner won’t make any repayments) – is this true?
Correct – however there are some lenders that will take into consideration your portion of the liability only but you are limiting your scope of future lenders.
The broker is responsible for submitting the correct information and supporting documents. It's in our best interest to get this right the first time because it can result in additional info being requested and the deal being placed back at the end of the cue (frustrating for all). Therefore, a lot of the burden should rest with the broker.
However, there are certain banks where stuff ups at their end are constant (faxes go missing, loan docs aren't sent, etc) – there's a few that I don't even bother dealing with any more because the process/experience is too painful for everyone concerned.
There are also times when the application goes belly up because of the client as well. There's nothing worse than having a deal be knocked back because the client has a default on their credit file (whether it be known to them or not) or they haven't been upfront with all of their liabilities, etc.
Always good to see a fellow Canberran on the forum.
There's a group of people who get together at the Canberra library once a month – there's usually a monthly reminder post. If you do a search you should be able to find the last post and subscribe to their facebook page.
If it's a once off and easily identifiable – then I can't see why the interest on that portion couldn't be claimed. However, I'm not an accountant so would recommend you seek professional advice.
With the offset – you don't lose the redraw facility. You just stop using it – and use your offset account instead (ie. you don't swap the redraw facility for the offset account, you'll just be left with both).
Forums are for networking and its a big skill in business, maybe you should change your mentality. Guys like Richard, Jamie and other, have there details on the net, beacuse they are A) Good at what they do its called marketing and these forums are for networking C) I would rather contact one of these guys, then any one else from your local yellow pages.
PS if you want real advice, get advice from some one who knows more than you, I personally look up to guys like jamie and Richard.
Thanks for the kind words Johann.
To alleviate Wayward's concerns, we do get a fair chunk of business via existing clients who have provided a good word about the experience they've had with us.
As far as this forum goes, it's a tad addictive – and if anything, probably consumes too much of my time.
On the flipside, I do have people contact me that have read my posts and I have arranged loans for quite a lot of them.
I don't openly use the forum as a place to solicit business and neither do the other regular contributors with business names in their signature. Having said that – if someone from the forum contacts me, then I'm always more than happy to help despite that they haven't contacted me via "word of mouth."
It sounds like you are a little fixated by interest rates – interest rates are only part of the finance equation as you also need to consider serviceability, or, in other words, how much you can borrow.
Amen – it happens all the time. Trying to save $20 per month on a 0.1% lower rate but wrong lender can end up costing a lot more in the long run. Not saying that's the case here but the "lowest rate" shouldn't be the number one concern when looking to purchase multiple properties.
I like the Lomas approach to property investing and I have enjoyed her books – but I'm not a huge fan of the approach taken in structuring finances.
The STG portfolio loan is fine – but you need to set-it up correctly.
You just need to set it up as a second, stand-alone loan against your PPOR which will be used as the deposits/costs on your IPs.
For instance, if you're looking to purchase a couple of IPs worth $250k each, then you'd set-up a $120k portfolio loan against your PPOR which would be used to cover two 20% deposits and costs on each $250k IP (about $60k each).
You'd then set-up separate, stand-alone interest only loans for the remaining 80% for each property (two loans at $200k each).
This way, you've avoiding crossing up your properties, which is in your best interest and not the banks.
If you look longer term – and think you might purchase more than a couple of IPs, then I'd look to access more equity now. You won't pay interest on it until you use it.
It probably all sounds a bit confusing but hopefully it helps.
Personally I'm a fan of IO loans accross every property in the portfolio – even the PPOR. I wrote an article for API magazine on this recently – instead of copy/pasting, here's the link