The strategy that I have been taught, through my parents & their accountant, is based on negative gearing & tax minimization. I have implemented this strategy myself and as mentioned in previous post I do have investment homes.
Hi Madbray
Best to get in touch with one of the guys above.…[Read more]
One way to do it (and it won't apply to everyone) is for a couple to have one person renovating, etc whilst the other still hold down a job.
Providing the job provides enough for servicing purposes – you might be able to get away with having one partner focus on the portfolio whilst the other slaves away at a desk …[Read more]
As others have said – it's not normally an issue providing everything can be explained and everything else stacks up (servicing, funds to complete, employment history, etc).
It may have an impact on credit scoring – especially at higher LVRs.
The Newbie Investor wrote:
Nice Jamie thank you, So for example if I already had a PPOR with principle & interest repayments and than decided to purchase IP with interest only am I disadvantaged in tax??
Nope – not necessarily.
You're only disadvantaged if you decide to rent the PPOR at some point – because you would have paid down a chunk…[Read more]
In terms of the minimum required funds – you need at least a 5% deposit and enough to cover costs such as stamp duty, legal fees, etc. All up, I'd allow another 5% for costs.
Some states have concessions for FHB's such as the first home owners grant and/or concessional stamp duty which can help lower the…[Read more]
I'd do both – some renos on the PPOR as well as saving as much as possible into the offset. I'd stick with affordable, cosmetic renos to add value and if you're handy – do it all yourself.
A second bathroom will cost a fair bit – you'll need to be reasonably confident it will add a fair bit of value.