@alibabawoo – are the block sizes the same? If not, what are their respective sizes? And what are the sizes of the backyards? Are the yards regular rectangle shapes or weird unusable triangle shapes? How wide are the driveways? Are there any covenants on the titles preventing subdivision, or building a granny flat in the backyard? We'd love to hear more info about these properties and throw around ideas with you!
Yes indeed. I've already told my younger brother all about this – putting surplus funds into an offset account and not onto the mortgage, and convert from P&I loan to IP loan as well if possible and cost-efficient to do so.
Thanks heaps guys! This is incredibly helpful and critical towards my current decision-making process
Stay away from investing in serviced apartments. Do a search on this site…. there is plenty of info to read on why it is a bad idea. In a nutshell, they just don't have the all-essential capital growth (in fact just by watching http://www.realestate.com.au, I've observed a particular serviced apartment building's dwellings actually go down in value!)
Depends on the suburb, and the target market (ie who your tenants will be).
I'd go with the extra loungeroom. Yards require gardening maintenance which is annoying. Furthermore, gardens do not earn rent. Rooms with rooves over them do. Now about this extra loungeroom… could it instead be a bedroom? Or a bedroom and a study if you spend a thousand bucks whacking an extra wall and door in? Bedrooms earn rent. Bedrooms add value to the resale.
Right okay. Damn I wish someone in the know had pulled me aside when I bought the house and said for gods sake luv, interest only with offset. None of this principal and interest business nooooooo.
@dan: yep I could remain in my current residence for another year or two, but keen to move at or before the two year mark.
@terry: indeed. I have done those sums and the sums say sell I hate that. I like the rule of never sell. Such a waste of stamp duty, legals and selling fees! I was kind of hopeful someone would spring up with some innovative way to hang onto the current place and move into the new one, without getting stung on the taxes as you say. I finally understand that I cannot expect to borrow against current PPOR to buy new PPOR and expect to deduct interest on current PPOR even though it would be an IP. Reason being the borrowings would be for a new PPOR which is not an investment item and thus no deductibility. What I still do not understand is: let's pretend my current PPOR had been interest only from day one, and therefore the full principal amount were still owing (albeit with a huge pile of cash in the offset). If I then withdraw that offset money to use for the new PPOR, would the debt on what is the current PPOR (converted to IP) be deductible? It is a debt…. the original purpose of the loan I took out was for PPOR purposes…. but by declaring I now want that house to be an IP would that debt's mortgage interest suddenly be deductible??? Seems weird…
Woo hoo!!!!!! Well done! You are on the ladder and now you shall prosper Don't discuss it with those not interested in investing. They'll say all sorts of things to make you doubt yourself. Remember how much research you have done to assure yourself that it is a good idea, and talk to such folk about other topics such as cinema. Don't let them mess with your confident investing mind
I'm confused… you are unhappy with living in a building that provides you with security against the undesirable types that roam around Sydney? Mate, these matters would definitely not be on my radar as "property management issues"
When you buy off-the-plan, you essentially get to see a piece of land where a developer proposes to build a dwelling. You only get to see plans and artists images of the proposed dwelling. You pay less stamp duty when buying off-the-plan, because the dwelling doesn't yet exist. So you effectively pay stamp duty only on the land price. When buying off-the-plan, you hope that the value of the whole thing will go up during the course of construction, thus "increasing the capital gain". You do not pay tax on a capital gain (ie the increased value of a property) unless you sell it. You simply high five yourself for the fact that the property is now worth more than you paid for it. And if you wish, you could refinance it, and use the "increase in value", otherwise known as equity, as a deposit on yet another property.
What in the article has brought you to that conclusion? I don't see it This article seems to be about a P&I with full offset, rather than an IO with full offset.
You wouldnt go to a Dr or had never done an operation but had read the surgeons manual and therefore you shouldnt use a Mortgage Broker who doesnt own any investment properties.
I'm happy to pay asking price if it is still a good investment and the numbers stack up. Better still if I can get it on a long settlement which saves money on bank interest anyway