Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 65 total)
  • Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    johann22 wrote:

    If some one wants to make money then they will. More wealther  people are made when times get though.

    Why? Average person will complain life is to hard, omg the bills, my cat needs this. All they do is buy shit and doom and gloom and scared to take a risk.

    Donald trump has failed so many times yet he is very wealthy, rich dad poor dad author same thing, james packer looses money in One tell moves on and know owns casinos in Hong Kong.

    There are people who always make excuses and blame the world but never blame them selves

    Trump inherited the family fortune and business taking some of its projects to near bankruptcy several times. He’s never really shown any business acumen and scraped through several commercial collapses by the skin of his teeth. He tends to go too big too hard too fast for the market and has an uncanny knack of positioning himself badly when a recession strikes. Nearly all of his personal wealth revolves are the value of his name. He’s never been personally bankrupt but he’s come close once.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

    Rich Dad Poor Dad guru Robert T. Kiyosaki is a fraud who’s never made an honest buck in his life

    http://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html

    James Packer inherited the family fortune and his since managed to whittle it down from and estimated $7.25B (2007) to just under$3B in 2009. He’s since clawed back to $4.16B He has about as much business nous as my dog.

    I know you mean well johann but be careful who you promote as role models.

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    Your kidding us right?

    You have a business with a 530k loan that puts $45k in your pocket every year and pays loan costs of 6k per mth.

    And you want to replace that with an IP. Show me where you can get an IP in this market that does even close to your business figures for the capital involved.

    Extremely hard to make an IP worth more – all have a maximum value regardless of capital invested. Businesses on the other hand have unlimited potential.

    I wouldn’t consider selling this business at this point. A buyer will simply look at TO and see it’s falling. Nobody will touch you unless you discount heavily.

    I would really have a hard look at the business from top to bottom. You need to analyse all aspects of its performance, measure that against other like businesses and figure out which parts are under performing. You would then try to either eliminate those cost centres or replace them with known better performers.

    TattsLotto are we talking newsagent or mixed business or something else. If you fill in a few blanks I can give you better ideas and info to consider or check out

    Don’t panic!! There’s lots of scope to fix the business even if it means diversifying or reorientating etc.

    Nokia started off as a paper company then bought into rubber then electronics before making it’s mark as a cell phone maker. Businesses are like shape shifters. You can turn them into anything you like over time.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    GetRichOrDieTrying wrote:
    You have to give me a bigger wink Jack.

    Maybe a pointing finger and GPS location lol

    I’ll save the wink and point the finger for you. No GPS required.

    So what would my advice be to a young fella with a young family who’s reasonably comfortable at the mo. There was an old american guy, 90’s I think who recently died. He was something of an investor legend over there. Prior to dropping off the perch, his last interview I think, he was asked what his secrete to success was and the most valuable thing he’d learnt over the years.

    Simple he said, “patience”

    Given the way the global economy is heading and the fact I think the lunatics may well be running the asylum, crunch time may well be just around the corner. Jez I’m not even confident we can make it to Xmas without a meltdown. We’ll know more after this month if Italy refinances successfully or not.

    I’m a “plan for worst hope for the best” kinda guy so I would go defensive. Maybe get rid of the com prop and down size the mortgage a little and poke some into precious metal (buy physical) and keep a little cash on hand then wait.

    If you look around these forums you’ll find the more astute investors have been doing this for more than a year now. They’ve rebalanced their portfolios and deleveraged down to more sustainable levels. They’ve kept the best performing and best positioned properties. A lot of the downside in the current market is attributed to investors getting out or rejigging.

    My gut feeling is that residential won’t be a flyer once the dust settles. It’s going to take a while (possible decades) for markets to recover but that’s not to say there won’t be some very good buying opportunities. I think in the coming years you’re going to see longer investment timelines than are currently the norm. In fact we may revert to a more traditional conservative investment philosophy similar to that which existed prior to the boom years.

    I consider understanding global macro, and to a lesser extent, micro trends essential to your toolkit to prevent being blindsided by national or even state economic/financial interference. A lot of the more aggressive investors here will get nailed quite badly in the coming correction because the either don’t understand or worse simply don’t care about external factors than can affect them. Many right these off as simply negatives that must be ignored in able to stick to the “stay positive” mantra of hard core property investing.

    But if you still have a masochistic PI urge then I would probably look to go commercial. I definitely wouldn’t look at industrial or retail. If I was buying commercial I would want something with an existing long term tenant. For example in my area a large ind block sold with Coates Hire as the tenant. They had a long term lease of 10yrs with right of renewal for another 10.

    Anyway you get the picture.

    Patience!!!

    Cheers Jack
    PS: I like your front page. Up there with the best I’ve seen

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    Used to design, build and develop many years ago. I didn’t know my ar$e from my elbow when I started but I had spent several off seasons as a teenager on construction sites.

    In saying that though there’s no way I’d take on someone else’s failed project.

    When you do your own development from the ground up you learn a lot and are thoroughly conversant with the project that often takes months if not years during the planning stages.

    Dropping into someone else’s half finished project would be a nightmare in my book. Not the way I would suggest one learns the ropes.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    ummester wrote:
    Just saying that a credit injection is the only thing that will stop the market from continuing to soften ATM – never said it was a good idea.

    The FEDs with their massive QE programs and near zero interest rates haven’t made any difference to the US property markets. Our problem is that we are maxed out on credit. Australian private debt stands at around $1.2 trillion. 60% of that is supposedly residential property debt which is funded by short term international funding. One of the big criticisms in the US is banks using short term borrowings to fund long term mortgages.

    Stopping the market from softening is not desirable anyway. That’s how markets should work.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    I see this is turning into the idiots corner. <moderator: delete personal comment>

    Have fun boys. I've got better things to do.

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    engelo10 wrote:
    Jacky, what do you suggest we all do If the world is coming to an end? Should I build a bunker and stock up on cans of beans? How long until this coming crisis will happen? I’ll stock up on popcorn now also hahahahaha

    I think you have the wrong disaster scenario there Engelo. You can hole up in one of the several empty IP’s you own. Oh no, that’s right the bank repossessed them. ;-)

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    JacM wrote:
    Bricks and mortar, people.  They've long been the "safe investment" for a reason.

    I’ll be sure to pass that onto the Irish, the POMs, the Greeks, the Spanish, the Yanks, the Europeans and the 100’s of Aussy mortgage holders going under every month. They obviously haven’t heard yet.
    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    engelo10 wrote:
    I hope you are right regarding the big recession coming, I wouldnt mind another crack at BHP for $20 and CBA at $25 a share hahaha

    What’s the old saying “ignorance is bliss”. You have absolutely no idea what’s coming do you. I wouldn’t be worried about buy shares if I was you. You won’t be able to buy a bag of popcorn when this is all over.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    Jamie wrote:
    You've heard it first hand people. Time to sell up – Jack has spoken….for the 12th time.

    It's getting old – surely there's a property hating forum that you can sign up to.

    Cheers

    Jamie

    I think I’m mightily outnumbered by the buy buy buy crowd.

    So I take it your expert advice is to buy into a falling market. I can see why you’re a mortgage broker and not a financial planner/investment advisor. Mind you with your investment philosophy you would do well at BoA, Fannie May or Freddie Mac. Oh that’s right they’re all mired in inextricable debt and will need bailing out again.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    ummester wrote:
    Seems to me that without a prompt credit injection, at rates borrowers can afford, the market will continue to soften or begin to crash. Question is, where does that credit injection come from?

    I tend to agree with most of what you say Unmester, however, credit or should I say easy credit is the primary cause of global woes. The last thing we need is more credit in a credit fuelled crises. The sooner we deleverage and take our medicine the sooner we can get on with rebuilding the new economies.

    It’s not going to be pretty I’m afraid.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    itsandrew wrote:
    I find it interesting that you don't like the idea of removing a tax.  I think you're probably right that they'll just increase tax somewhere else but perhaps they'll defer some spending till the tax take catches up in a couple of years.

    In any case whether it lowers house prices or not I think is a secondary issue.  For me the less the tentacles of government intrude into the different areas of life the better things are for the life and liberty of it's citizens.  If government wants to reduce it's presence in the housing sector then that's a good thing.  Getting government to cut its ties with other areas of private life would be better still.

    Totally agree.

    Gobermint’s constant tinkering with the market has done nothing to aid affordability, quite the contrary.

    I ran a removal business in Sydney several years ago and moved many a young client who actually had zero savings. The FHOG and a few bucks from the folks 110% leverage and you were in. Only to find within a few years that they’d bought at the top of the market on historically low interest rates. Adding to the pain was the increased commute costs and time lost moving out west to get that McMansion.

    Many have ended in tears that’s for sure.

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    let’s do a back of the knapkin kinda exercise to gauge this.

    Lets say 130 properties have a conservative average value off $200k that’s around $26,000,000 and they return $200k split between 2 ppl.

    That kinda works out at net investment return of 0.8%

    If one goes hell for leather to acquire 130 properties in such a short time frame I can only assume you would have to leverage your equity to the max and then some.Logic tells me that you could only achieve this in a very hot property market where high CG growth allowed you to use rising equity values to place deposits. As the number of properties grow so the equity value grows exponentially.

    Couple of things to note for the novice investor when reading these types of books. Do the market conditions that enabled these guys to ramp up to 130 properties in such a short time currently exist or likely to exist in the near future. I doubt that any of the prerequisite conditions exist today or are likely to in the near future.

    The other point to note is that if had anything like $26mil invested I wouldn’t be making $200k/yr. I’d be making that per week.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/weekly-update/31-08-2011

    Year on year fall in Melbourne is -5.0%

    I would be seriously considering cashing out of any property for the time being not buying more.

    Jack

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    The Great Correction nears……..

    Quote:
    The ‘L’ word is back

    Fear gripped European banks last night, of a kind we have not seen since the collapse of Lehman in 2008 which brought on the global financial crisis. As I explain below, Australia will not be immune.

    But when Lehman collapsed it was fear of the unknown. This time markets are scared of what they actually know – that if major European banks wrote down their Greek, Spanish, Italian and other European sovereign debt holdings to the current market, their equity capital would be wiped out.

    That fear makes banks nervous about lending to each other and pushes up the cost of the wholesale money that Australian banks need. Australia’s banks are among the world’s largest wholesale borrowers, but fortunately most of our banks have borrowed their immediate requirements.

    The flight out of the euro pushed up the US dollar and will depress our currency, particularly as commodity prices are falling. In turn our sharemarket is also likely to be affected.

    Deutsche Bank took some of the heaviest punishment because its chief Josef Ackermann actually mentioned the ‘L’ word, saying the situation resembled that of the panic that followed the collapse of US investment bank Lehman Brothers in 2008 (European shares hit 2-week low, September 5; Europe’s bank fears blow out, September 6).

    But Deutsche is one of the banks in the front line in this crisis because it was a heavy investor on the damaged sovereign debt bonds.

    You will remember in the global road map at the Hayman Leadership Retreat, the global traders said Europe would be forced to abandon the ineffective schemes to paper over the problem. As Karen Maley explained yesterday, already Greece is turning its back on its austerity obligations (Greece hits an austerity wall, September 5).

    The traders are demanding that Europe adopt a solution of substance. There are only two – either Germany or a few others leave the euro which then slumps, bankrupting a series of German and French banks led by Deutsche. Not surprisingly, Deutsche shares fell 9 per cent last night. The second solution is for all European states to joint and severally guarantee all European bonds. That will maintain the banks but will crush the German economy. Again, not surprisingly, the German share index, the DAX, is leading Europe down.

    Neither are pleasant solutions.

    Source; Business Spectator, Robert Gottliebsen http://tiny.tw/8SR
    Published 6:30 AM, 6 Sep 2011

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    engelo10 wrote:
    Anyways lets move on enough of this battering, you can go post more negativity on othe people’s topics or wait untill I post something new again hahaha

    Regards,
    Engelo

    Your problem Engelo is you’ve been caught out blowing off like you’re some astute PI when in fact both you and Nathan can’t substantiate your claims.

    As for negativity I’ve simply questioned the discrepancies in your assumptions and you still can back them with anything remotely substantive.

    If you think this is a battering then I think you will find the next few years incredibly trying.

    The reason you’ve been taken to task is twofold; to make you stop and think more comprehensively about PI so that you can better survive into the years ahead; and secondly signal to others, who are not so knowledgeable but looking for information, that spurious claims by wannaby PIs aren’t all they’re made out to be.

    A lot of the investment theory/philosophy I see espoused here is easily debunked with a few critical questions. Once exposed they immediately label one as ‘negative’ as a counter to their somewhat questionable advice. There are many industry professionals here (I use the word professional lightly), evidenced by their signature blocks, that offer dubious encouragement much of the time. I find the paradox of a professional who provides excellent technical advice to someone who’s either in or entering into an often highly leveraged high risk investment as ludicrous. The analogy would be the coach giving a swimmer last minute coaching tips knowing full well the chances of making it across the channel are remote and one will likely drown!

    I see you like the swimmer. I’m trying to tell you don’t swim your gonna drown because the sea’s too rough. Ppl like Nathan though are strapping bricks around your waist and saying “Go for it Engelo you can do it”.

    But anyway you’re a big boy now albeit with a thin hide. I’m not optimistic about your chances but good luck anyway.

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    Engelo is this not what you requested:

    ” I would like other peoples opinion as to what they think about having a portfolio of 10or more properties that are pretty much neutrally geared”

    Are you only after positive reinforcement which usually includes masking or simply excluding the true picture.

    Forums like these offer valuable information especially that of a technical nature. They, however, are not so good at providing a balanced view when opinion is called for. There are only a few ppl here who will give it to you straight from the hip.

    I’ve critiqued what you and Nathan have said and found way too many holes in your plan. Based on current market conditions and a deteriorating global economy I see no upside in your plan or strategy only loosely based assumptions with a heavy upside bias that ignores every market indicator. If I was to describe your current buying spree and accompanying strategy I could only describe it as reckless at best.

    You could of course argue your case with facts and figures. I look forward to those with interest.

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    Nathan – His goal is $50,000pa in 5 yrs cash-flow positive from his properties.

    Engelo – a portfolio of 10or more properties that are pretty much neutrally geared.

    I have a problem reconciling these two statements

    Engelo – have to apologise for not being educated enough to understand your philosophy

    It's not that hard Engelo.

    Nathan – Why? Because he has bought below market

    A property spruiker favouite. So they sold it below market value because they had plenty of buyers lined up – give me a break. Whatever you pay IS market value. You just set a benchmark for that area. In other words prices MAY be slipping in that area.

    Nathan – consistent properties which chug along no matter what market we see

    That kind of advise scares me especially when a young fella like Nathan who has only ever known good times comes up with perla's like that. Any investor who thinks his investment is bullet proof needs a wake up call.

    Nathan – He is buying in bread and butter locations so even on Dole cheques they can still pay the rent

    Been on the dole lately. I sure as hell know i's struggle to pay circa $300/wk. My guess is that any tenant with financial difficulties will soon start to skip their rent. Buy the time you evict them you'll be out the door $1000's. Think it doesn't happen? then you need to read around this forum a bit more.

    Nathan – I say this as he is a little "green" but is well and truly on the way to having a solid portfolio

    Would that be the one with 10 properties that are " pretty much neutrally geared" or the mystical ones that will somehow produce $50k

    Nathan – If the properties rent rses $10pw each year for next 10 years thats $5000 cf+pa on only 1 deal.

    And if rents drop $40/wk that's around $10k in the hole per year. And that reminds me of the guy who's $20k down after 5 yrs and down $10k/yr after claiming every conceivable tax deduction he can. Bet he thought 5 yrs ago he couldn't lose. He's in this forum.

    Nathan – Who here doesn't do a $10pw rent increase

    That would be the 100's of landlords across Aus trying to get tenants. Their rents are going down dare I say the 'down' word.

    Engelo- I am confident that there are quite a few people out there that could hold if we must get so formal a NEGATIVELY GEARED property for $20 per week.

    Agh yes but can you handle 10 at $40ng/wk while your beating the sidewalk looking for a new job.

    Engelo – $155k is excluding costs. Property was purchased $25k below most recent comparables within same complex of same property size(source RP Data) so there is a bit of a margin of safety if prices drop.

    There's no margin for safety in a falling market. You bought at $25k below because that was market price at the time. You think ppl think oh what nice guy Engelo is I'll let him have for a $25k discount. Wake up!!!

    Engelo – I am interested in purchasing as many properties I can implementing the strategy I have in place and so far it has been successful

    Successful! You've owned 3 properties for less than 6 months and you can't articulate a clear strategy about how it all pulls together.

    Engelo – How would you go about achieving a passive income of $50k per annum minimising risk, ensuring capital growth and a solid exit solid strategy if your were starting off today

    Now that would be the business I have that cost $40k, takes about 25hrs per week and nets around $200 -250k. I don't worry about capital growth because I have very little capital invested. Risk management is more about where to go next with an opportunity should this one expire unexpectantly.

    Do I own property – no. used to be a property developer many moons ago. Made a lot lost a lot. Learnt that money isn't everything. Now I prefer a little stock investing, investing in high return businesses kicking back when the mood takes me.

    Property is just an investment sector. It is neither good nor bad. You should think of yourself as an investor NOT simply a property investor. Every sector offers opportunities but not all the time. Property has had its day for the time being. It will come again in about 3 – 5 years is a rough guess. At the moment there aren't any good places to invest but you can speculate, however, speculating is high risk and not recommended for green horns.

    <moderator: delete personal comments>

    You're learning to be an offensive investor. Learn how to be a defensive investor and you'll round your investor skill set out and hopefully survive and succeed were others fail.

    Good luck

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66

    “But hope it also to be neutral/slightly positive down the line.”

    Sounds like thorough planning and research went into this venture :-(

    Another lamb to the slaughter!!!!

    Profile photo of JackFlashJackFlash
    Member
    @jackflash
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 66
    engelo10 wrote:
    hahahaha I have your attention now.

    Hey guys,

    Just purchased a unit for $155k returning $260 per week. Although not cashflow positive its only costing me $20 a week before depreciation tax to hold and its within 1 hour drive of Sydney CBD. Im pretty stoked with this deal bringing my tally to 3 properties now all bought within the last 6 months . I would like other peoples opinion as to what they think about having a portfolio of 10or more properties that are pretty much neutrally geared? I have 2 other properties on the cards and am planning to continue investing with this strategy in place. Thanks for your time.

    Regards,
    Engelo

    155k is that including ingoing costs or excluding (buy price)…. returning $260/wk – so you have it leased??

    Its negatively geared – costs you $20/wk

    1hr from Syd CBD – like where would that be. There’s a lot of km’s 1 hr drive heading out depending on time of day. Midnight’ll get you to the Blue Mountains.

    “Im pretty stoked with this deal bringing my tally to 3 properties” sounds like your more about acquiring properties to up your personal score.

    “10 or more properties that are pretty much neutrally geared” What does ‘pretty much’ mean and is 10 a magic number or something.

    So lets see. You’ve bought into an asset class that is coming off the biggest credit bubble in history. Values are moving down at varying rates depending on location and value position in the market. For all intents and purposes you are negatively geared. Because you are negatively geared I’d say you’re probably highly leveraged.

    My guess is your investing strategy revolves around property values appreciating and rents going up.

    Here’s what I think is MOST likely but not necessarily so.

    Property values will continue to decline overall as concerns over global financial stability continues to dominate. Rents will come under pressure as rising unemployment starts to hit the working class harder and harder however lay-offs will come across the employment spectrum. CBD areas may take the initial brunt as financial institutions lay-off 1000’s (67000+ in Europe and 10000+ in the US in the last few months alone). Inner city areas may in fact have some of the highest unemployment rates.

    Many analysts believe stagflation (increasing inflation with decreasing asset values) is occurring already. This suggests that while economies might stall or go into recession (note there is a growing consensus that the global economy is already in recession and heading for a depression) central banks will be forced to raise rates to contain inflation. On top of that it is also like that banks will push rates even higher as cost of borrowing in a liquidity crises continue to rise.

    The problems that face property investors is that globally forces are growing that will in all likelihood overwhelm you. If you take the attitude “She’ll be right”, Australia is different, property always goes up then I’m afraid you’re doomed.

    The next financial crunch already has a name… The Great Correction. It’ll make the 1930’s era Depression look like a walk in the park by comparison. How it plays out and when things finally snaps is anyone’s guess.

    Like all investors in any market. If you’re over leveraged and holding the wrong assets you’ll be wiped out. Smart investors deleverage and shift their wealth to safe(r) asset classes to ride out market turmoil. Property is the least safe of all places.

    See you on the bread line ;-)

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 65 total)