I don’t know if anyone has said this already, as there are too many replies for me to read at the moment. If you can find pos. cash flow i.p.’s all the better, buy as many as you can, but if you can’t, don’t be put off. Negative gearing is a wonderful thing, as it is better to pay interest and end up with something, than to pay tax and end up with nothing.
I tried to do the sanding, but it’s too hard – had a handyman with experience do it, then I did the varnishing.
This was very easy, with a soft broom and a semi gloss floor varnish.
The floors look a million dallars.
i have always worked on, how much do i need to live on, and everything else is surplus, and can be used to service loans, plus the income from any new investment.
then just divide that amount by the interest rate and that will give you a good idea.
eg; income 60,000/a
need 40,000/a to live
surplus 20,000/a
divide 20,000 by say 7.3% fixed for 7 years
= 274,000 roughly.
i work out what i think it might cost me to bring it up to scratch, and offer that much less, it looks like you know what you are talking about, and they start thinking you might just have a valid point, and hopefully meet your offer or come close to it.
jars – if your paying that much tax, you should be buying more and more properties – neg geared properties and let the tax man pay for them, and then you can cash in on the capital gains.
i was only paying 30 grand tax, and i managed 8 ip’s, so just imagine what you could achieve with 200 grand in interest instead of tax.
please don’t limit yourself to only positive geared or cashflow ip’s, you could be doing so much more.
if you don’t care if they leave, tell them you have done everything you are required to do and that is it.
if they are good and you want to keep them, calculate the extra expenses and tell them they will have to cover the interest and expenses on the extra borrowings.
when i work out if i can afford a property or not, i work my rental income out on a vacancy rate of 4 weeks a year that it may be vacant, so that if you do have a short period vacant, you can still afford it.
it’s always safer, than assuming your property will be fully rented all year every year.
have more than a dozen, all neg-geared, started in 1987. slowed down a few times, now reading steve’s book and will be starting again. it’s become a very profitable hobby for me.[]
the return from commercial or industrial is usually higher than from residential, but the risk is higher, the bank will usually only lend up to 65% of their valuation and if your tenant leaves – lease or no lease, it may be difficult to find another, reducing the rent by $10 will probably not help as it does in a house.
remember as always the bigger the gain the bigger the risk.