Forum Replies Created
Terry,
Sorry for slow reply I was interstate trying to source an IP. No luck yet but I know I’m getting closer.
Your last reply makes complete sense. I’d actually sorted it in my head from one of Elkas posts.
For some crazy reason I was thinking of the depreciation as an expense ie. money I had to come up with. Of course this was stupid and may be a factor of being on night shift. You last example explains it well so cheers.Elka if you still read this late post then thanks for the tip on the Hybrids.
I did a lot of research into the structure I wanted earlier this year and decided that the simple discresionary may benefit me longer term. I dont intend to buy anything too heavily geared in the negative and I figure that long term complete discresion over profit distribution throughout a large extended family will have the largest tax breaks. i may be wrong but for the style of IP’s I’ll be after I think its the best and easiest.
Hybrids look nice yes but unless some fo the IP’s are heavily negative then I didnt see the benefit.Thanks to you both
GroagesTerry,
I’m not sure that I follow. I thought that depreciation was used to make a property as close to neutrally geared as possible.
If a trust claims it as an expense then this is actually doing the opposite and you would be better off not claiming it at all.
Is this what you are saying?
I thought that the figures would look like
Net return is given by
Income = rent ($16120) + Depro (eg $4000) for year 1
minus
Outgoings = Interest (about 20,000) + rates etc
This works out to be about cash neutral.
If the depreciation is an expense then outgoings is about $24,000 and I’m about $8,000 out of pocket.
Sorry if I’m missing something.