Forum Replies Created
maybe the vendor is hiding something,
something you might find a problem with after spending extra time there.
have you had a building and pest inspection done?
frosty1
hi matt,
unfortunately i can't help you on that one.
but could you tell me what courses and who's seminars you have been to.?
and were they of no help at all?
thanks,
frosty1
thanks marc,
i am reading as many books as i can,
there are many available, and it's a great, easy, cheap ( from library), way to learn and get ideas and become inspired.
this forum is like a good book that never ends, some very good reading, helps you to come to your own conclusions.
also if something is not understood, you have the opportunity to ask questions, how good is that?
great to hear many opinions, helps to form your own.
hope to hear how you go with your business endeavour,
all the best,
frosty1
hi marc,
who wrote '' WHO STOLE MY MONEY '' ? ,
is it one of robert .k's books?
is it about things to avoid, mistakes etc?
frosty1
hi,
thank you very much for the above web site/link.
very interesting.
thanks again.
frosty1
hi jon,
do you now much about renting houses out by the room?
can you still get landlords insurance.
will realestate agents still manage your property for you, renting in this manner?
are there any other difficulties in doing this?
thanks for any reply.
frosty1
my grandparents were both working most of their life.
they could not apparently afford to buy their first house untill they were in their 50's.
this was about 70/80 years ago in oakleigh, (melbourne).my parents had rented 14 different houses before they were able to purchase their own house.
this was about 45 years ago in blackburn (melbourne)i am in my 40's and i fully own 2 and a bit properties and i don't think i work any harder than my parents or grandparents would have.
we just live in different times. (quite possibly easier times).it also depends on what we individually do with our earned money over time, of course.
frosty1
initial consultation is usually free.
good to get a rough plan in your head first and see what they think .
then go to several others and compare their ideas.
costs nothing to do this, only your own time.
it may give you some ideas to help you make your own mind up.
frosty.
thanks terry,
interesting reading.
frosty.
NAB has licensed financial planners that usually sell all types of life insurance, income protection insurance ect.
they will be biased but that doesn't mean it will be a bad deal.
they might be quite competative. worth comparing not only their price but also their opinions.
frosty
Hi Terry, thanks for the response again.
someone that goes crazy with credit cards possibly wouldn't be good with investments, as you need to be disiplined with money to do well.
also, in this day and age, drinking and driving is something that should be kept under control to be successful in more ways than one.
i do understand there will always be some risk to a certain degree.if you had money you had to distribute in a tax effective way, you could always off set it with another investment property, that way you wouldn't pay any tax on it at all.
not sure how a time bomb would result from rents continually rising as this once again could be off set by buying another investement property. this would result in a growing investment property portfolio, being the desired result for many.
this could continue untill you wanted to cut back on working for wages. stop buying properties to offset the positive gearing effect and start to live off the properties income. eventually living off a passive income. to speed things up a little you may want to sell some properties to pay down some debt on others. the tax you pay on a capital gain might not be too much if you have stopped or cut back on your working wage.being in personal names also gets you a 50% discount on capital gains tax ( held longer than 12 months ), something that companies don't get. ( not sure if trusts do, don't think so though ).
the tax advantage you get along the way, if held in personal names, is helpfull in building up a portfolio quicker.
its nice to not only have yourself and the tennant paying for your properties but also the tax man. ( depreciation claims, etc.)i still find it hard to determine the best ownership structure as many experts favor different ways, and all have good reasons, for and against each way.
i have read many property investments books including Steve Mcknights, Michael Yardneys, Margaret Lomas, and many more and all seem to be very successful people. many have made it and with very different investment methods including ownership structures.kind reguards,
frosty.terryw, thanks for your reply. it's great to hear your views, i'm still learning.
i think people at high risk would be people that work for them selves,in private business, doctors, surgens, etc.
i'm not sure of the risk for people who work for wages and that have car and property insurances for liability.( landlords insurance etc. ) is this still too risky?is your theory with a cousin for example, one where you could distribute money to them tax free and then have the money returned to you for your own purpose. so the cousin is just doing you a favor?. and maybe reward them some way, with some money to a lesser value as what the tax would have been. or do you just give it to them as a gift?.
which rebates would allow a $1200 pa payment for under 18's , to be tax free?
i just thought if a non working spouse went back to work, they would be in a position to then buy another property negative geared. this would perhaps neutralise tax she would be paying from the positive geared property/s.
same goes for the higher wage earner that has a neg geared prop that is turning into a pos geared prop. they also could buy another neg geared prop to neutralise or off set any tax. ( as you said, the tax advantage may be higher initially. this theory should keep the advantage all the way through.)
as this goes on they are building a bigger property portfolio, their purpose of property is profit in the form of equity building.
would this theory be good for building a passive income for retirement?, or could you choose to only sell some when you retire or when you are not earning a large income, and not have to pay as much CGT?.could you please comment further on any of this terry.
thanking you,
frosty.hi,
i think all 3 ways would be used by different people.
it depends on what suits your sitiation.
there are fors and againsts for all.
i also find it difficult to determine which is best even when i weigh up the good and bad of all structures.
most property investement books i have read explain the ins and outs of different ownership structures.
a lot seem to favor trusts.
but margaret lomas does not really speak in favor of trusts. her books are very interesting and are worth reading.
good luck,
frosty
HI ALL,
i have been interested in the 'trust verses own name structure' for a while now and i am still unsure what is best.
does anybody know anyone that has actually been sued and lost their properties or assetts?
in a trust property expenses and losses cannot be claimed against personal income.
who else would you want to pass income to through the trust other than your spouse or your children?
children can only receive $500 or $600 without paying tax and then they pay very high tax there after.
if your spouse is a low income earner, positive geared property or close to, could be bought in her name.
or, negative geared property could be bought in your name if you are the higher income earner.sometimes the tax advantage can be better if bought in your own name, don't you think?
what do people think?
thanks,
frosty.
hi,
would a morgage off set account be a better set up than a LOC?
i guess they have different purposes.is an off set account only good if you have the extra funds available?
your income still goes into it just the same as an LOC, and reduces the amount of interest paid and causes no tax problems with money coming in or out for personal use or whatever.will a LOC help pay down a morgage any quicker than an off set acount?
any comments,
thanks,
frosty1I guess towards the end result, you want properties to end up on the positive geared side, but as this occurs i would think it would be time to buy again. do you think?
hi sammi 13,
may i ask why you want a trust?
I am just curious as to their advantages to justify having one.
thanks,
frosty1thanks scott,
once subdivided and i sell, how and who determines the cost base price of the new block?
as it came from my PPOR. This would also lower the value of my PPOR because it is now on a smaller piece of land.
If i sell it all together as one, i pay no CGT. If i sell in two pieces i pay CGT.
Is this right?
thanks again,
frosty1
hi,
i may have looked at the same property.
it was leased out untill feb 08.
i thought it was a good investment also and i nearly bought it.
it only had a single garage. corner block.
i thought it was a good buy at that price even if it was unfurnished. if it became vacant for too long you could always advertise it for rent as furnished or unfurnished. and just sell the furniture at the local auctions.
i have found some town houses available off the plan also for 230k. 3bedroom, ensuite, double garage,brand new, no stamp duty,expected rental return of 250 to 280, same area, i am currently considering one of these.
many opportunities out there.frosty1.
units4me wrote:There is only one regional vic town of 20000+ population with a present growth rate of approx 2%PA or more (
ABS 2001-2006). It may surprise many.hi,
are you thinking of traralgon?frosty1